Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of vaccinations applied through eyes and nostrils against Newcastle disease in poultry

Kanatlılarda Newcastle hastalığına karşı göz ve burun yoluyla aşılamaların karşılaştırıması

Pages
209–215
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The chicks were bled on each 15 consecutive days and antibody titres in groups 1 and 2 were found to be 6.40 and 6.80 on the 62nd day, 5.80 and 5.93 on the 77th day, 5.20 and 5.33 on the 92nd day, and 4.93 and 5.06 on the 107th day.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this s.tudy, antibody level and immunity produced in chicks vaccinated against Newcastle disease via the eye drop and the nostril drop were compared.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mean maternal antibody titre of chicks was determined as $Log_2$ HI 5.03.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The chicks were bled on each 15 consecutive days and antibody titres in groups 1 and 2 were found to be 6.40 and 6.80 on the 62nd day, 5.80 and 5.93 on the 77th day, 5.20 and 5.33 on the 92nd day, and 4.93 and 5.06 on the 107th day.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this s.tudy, antibody level and immunity produced in chicks vaccinated against Newcastle disease via the eye drop and the nostril drop were compared. Chicks were divided into two groups; one group was vaccinated via the eye drop and the other group via the nostril drop. Blood samples taken periodically were assessed by haemaglutination inhibition test. Mean maternal antibody titre of chicks was determined as $Log_2$ HI 5.03. Mean $Log_2$ HI titres in chicks vaccinated with HBl vaccine strain via the eye drop and the nostril drop were found to be 8.52 and 8.96, respectively. Each group were re-vaccinated via in drinking water with LaSota vaccine virus. Antibody titres in blood samples taken from re-vaccinated animals were 8.80 and 9.06 in groups received HBl vaccine virus via the eye drop+LaSota vaccine virus in drinking water and HBl vaccine virus via the nostril drop+LaSota vaccine virus in drinking water, respectively. The chicks were bled on each 15 consecutive days and antibody titres in groups 1 and 2 were found to be 6.40 and 6.80 on the 62nd day, 5.80 and 5.93 on the 77th day, 5.20 and 5.33 on the 92nd day, and 4.93 and 5.06 on the 107th day.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Newcastle hastalığına karşı göze ve buruna damla yoluyla aşılanan civcivlerde oluşan antikor düzeyi ve bağışıklığın durumu karşılaştırıldı. Hayvanlar iki gruba ayrıldı ve gruplardan biri göze damla diğeri buruna damla yoluyla aşılandı. Periyodik olarak alınan kan numunelerine hemaglutinasyon inhibisyon testi uygulandı. Ortalama maternal antikor litreleri $Log_2$ HI 5,03 olarak saptandı. HBl aşı virüsü ile göze ve buruna damla yoluyla yapılan aşılamalarda sırasıyla ortalama $Log_2$ HI litresi 8,52 ve 8,96 elde edildi. LaSoIa aşı virüsü kullanılarak her iki grup içme suyu yolu ile yeniden aşılandı. HBl aşı virüsü göze damla+LaSota aşı virüsü içme suyu ile aşılananlarda ortalama $Log_2$ HI litresi 8,80 iken HBl aşı virüsü buruna damla+LaSota aşı virüsü içme suyu ile aşılananlarda da 9,06 olarak tespit edildi. Periyodik olarak 15 gün ara ile alınan kan numunelerinde ise sırası ile birinci ve ikinci grupta 62. günde 6.40 ve 6.80, 77. günde 5.80 ve 5.93, 92. günde 5.20 ve 5.33, 107. günde 4.93 ve 5.06 olarak belirlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜMÜŞSOY, K., ESENDAL, Ö. M. (2022). Comparison of vaccinations applied through eyes and nostrils against Newcastle disease in poultry. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 3, 209–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/445306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Allan WH, Lancester JE, Toth B (1978): Newcastle disease vaccines their production and use. FAO Animal Production and Health Series No: 10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 2.Arda M (1976): Hollanda'da Newcastle hastalığı üzerinde çalışmalar ve HI testinin yeni yönteme göre değerlen­ dirilmesi. Vet Hek Dern Derg, 46, 19-28. 3.Arda M (1996): HI test sonuçlarının istatistiksel değerlen­ dirilmesi. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Doktora Ders Kredi Not­ ları. 4.Arda M, Başkaya H, Aydın N (1971): Newcastle has1.talığına karşı kloakal yolla aşılama üzerinde araştırma. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 18, 299-309. 5.Başkaya H, Arda M (1970): Patogen İsrail Newcastle susu üzerinde immünolojik ve serolojik araştırmalar. An­ kara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 17, 35-46. 6.Beard CW, Villegas P, Glisson JR (1993): Comparative efficacy of the B-l and VG/GA vaccine strains against velogenic viscerotropic Newcastle disease virus in chickens. Avian Dis, 37, 222-225. 7.Bell IG, Ait Belarbi D, Amara A (1990): A controlled vaccination trial for Newcastle disease under village con­ ditions. Prev Vet Med, 9, 295-300. 8.Bingöl M, Babilâ A (1970): Newcastle burun-göz damla aşısı ile meydana gelen bağışıklık üzerinde denemeler. Pen­ dik Vet Kont Araş Enst Derg, 3, 100-104. 9.Bruning-Fann C, Kaneene J, Heamon J (1992): In­ vestigation of an outbreak of velogenic viscerotropic New­ castle disease in pet birds in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois and Texas. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 201, 1709-1714. 10.Gaffar Elamin MA, Khalafalla AI, Ahmed SM (1993): Observations on the use ofKomarov strain of Newcastle di­ sease vaccine in the Sudan. Trop Anim Health Prod, 25, 151-154. 11.Jordan FTW (1990): Poultry Disease. 3rd ed. Bailliere Tindall, London. 12.Lancester JE (1981): Newcastle disease. Pathogenesis and diagnosis. J World Poult Sci Ass, 37, 26-33. 13.Rajeswar JJ, Masillamony PR (1993): Spray vaccine against Newcastle disease. Indian Vet J, 70, 402-404. 14.Russell PH, Koch G (1993): Local antibody forming cell responses to the Hitchner Bl and Ulster strains of New­ castle disease virus. Vet Immunol Immunpathol, 37,165-180. 15.Schalkoort R, Morgan DM, Spradbrow PB (1982): The serological response of chickens to oil emulsion vaccines containing the V4 strain of Newcastle disease virus. Aust Vet J, 58, 260-263.