SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

Süt sığırlarında ayak lezyonlarının sağaltımında ayak çizmesi kullanımı

Use of hoof boot for the treatment of foot lesions in dairy cows

İbrahim DEMİRKAN
Pages
93–97
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Differences between groups were statistically significant (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was evaluated the effectiveness of hoof boot on the treatment of digital and interdigital dermatitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 80 Friesian-Holstein cows were divided into two groups, each consisting of 40 cows.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Differences between groups were statistically significant (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it was evaluated the effectiveness of hoof boot on the treatment of digital and interdigital dermatitis. A total of 80 Friesian-Holstein cows were divided into two groups, each consisting of 40 cows. Group I (GI) contained cows suffer-ing from digital dermatitis whereas group II (Gil) contained cow with interdigital dermatitis. GI was further divided into four sub-groups; in Gl-a (n=10) feet were sprayed with oxytetracycline and hoof boot was applied; in Gl-b (n=10) feet were sprayed with only saline solution and hoof boot was applied. Whereas in GI-c (n=10) lesions were left open and sprayed with oxytetracycline; in Gl-d (n=10) lesions were left open and only saline solution was applied. Gil (n=40) was also divided into 4 subgroups as for GI. Lameness disappeared in Gl-a and GH-a within 3 days and healing of lesions occurred between 9 and 14 days after single application. In Gl-b and Gll-b lesions persisted and two more applications required..Healing in these groups occurred within 21-29 days. Differences between groups were statistically significant (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada sığırlarda ayak çizmesinin digital ve interdigital dermatitis'in sağaltımındaki etkisi araştırıldı. Toplam 80 adet Friesian-Holstein süt ineği çalışmaya dahil edildi. Herbiri 40 inekten oluşan iki gruba ayrıldı. Grup I'i digital dermatitisli, grup H'yi interdigital dermatitisli inekler oluşturdu. Grup I (GI) tekrar 4 alt gruba ayrıldı; Gl-a'da (n=10) bulunanlara ayak çizmesi giy-dirilip oxytetrasiklin uygulanirken GI-b'dekilere (n=10) ayak çizmesi giydirilip sadece serum fizyolojik tatbik edildi. G-Ic'de (n=10) ise lezyon acık bırakılıp sadece oksitetrasiklin uygulandı, G-Id sadece serum fizyolojik ile muamele edildi. G-II'deki (n=40) ineklerde aynı grup I'dekiler gibi alt gruplara ayrılıp işlem yapıldı. Gl-a ve GII-a'da topallık ortalama 3 gün içerisinde düzelirken lezyonlann ortalama 9-14 gün içerisinde tek uygulamayı izleyerek iyileştiği görüldü. Gl-b ve GII-b'de ise iyileşme 21-29 gün içerisinde 2 uygu-lamadan sonra gözlendi. Gruplar arası farklılıklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRKAN, İ. (2022). Süt sığırlarında ayak lezyonlarının sağaltımında ayak çizmesi kullanımı. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 93–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/445265

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Adams OR (1960): Foot rot in cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 136,589-599
  2. Amstutz HE (1985): Prevention and control of lameness in dairy cattle. Vet Clin North Am: Food Anim Pract, 1,25-37
  3. Andersson L, Lundstrom K (1981): The influence of breed, age, body weight and season on digital diseases and hoof size in dairy cattle. J Vet Med A, 28, 141-151
  4. Berry S, Read DH, Wlaker RL (1999): Recurrence of papillomatous digital dermatitis (footwarts) in dairy cows after treatment with lincomycin HCl or oxytetracycline HCl. J Dairy Sci, 82, 34
  5. Blood DC, Studdert VP (1993): Lameness
  6. In: Baillere's Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary. 3rd impression. Bailliere Tindall, London
  7. Britt JS, Carson MC, von Bredow JD, Condon RJ (1999): Antibiotic residues in milk samples obtained from cows after treatment for papillomatous digital dermatitis. J Am VetMed Assoc, 215, 833-836
  8. Blowey RW (1994): Studies on the pathogenesis and con trol of digital dermatitis. 8th International Symposium on Disorders of the Ruminant Digit and Conference on Bovine Lameness, University of Saskatchewan, Banff, 26-30 June, Canada, 142-154
  9. Brizzi A (1990): Bovine digital dermatitis treatment trials. Obiett e Doc Vet, 11,51-54
  10. Collick DW, Ward WR Dobson H (1989): Association between types of lameness and fertility. Vet Rec, 125,103-106
  11. Dewes HF (1978): Some aspects of lameness in dairy cattle. New Z Vet J, 26,147-149
  12. Essjemont R (1990): The costs of lameness in dairy herds. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Diseases of the Ruminant Digit. British Cattle Veterinary Association, University of Liverpool, 16-20 July, UK,237-251
  13. Green LE, Hedges VJ, Schukken YH, Blowey RW, Packington AJ (2002): The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 85, 2250-2256
  14. Greenough PR, MacCallum FJ Weaver AD, (1981): Diseases of digital skin and subcutis. 151-169. In: Lameness in Cattle. 2nd edition, Wright Scientechnica, Bristol
  15. Manske T, Hultgren J, Bergsten C (2002): Topical treatment of digital dermatitis associated with severe heel-horn erosion in a Swedish dairy herd. Prev Vet Med, 53, 215-231
  16. Merritt JB, Manşon FJ Russell WB Downham DY (1992): The effect of lameness on milk production in friesian-holstein cows. Proceedings of 104th Meeting of the British Society of Animal Production. Scarborough, 4- 6 April, UK, 479-480
  17. Mgasa MN, Mgongo FOK, Munjuni PF (1990): The economic importance of lameness in impor