SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

Ankara yöresinde sığır neosporozisinin immunocomb testi ile serolojik tanısı

Serodiagnosis of bovine neosporosis with immunocomb assay in Ankara Region

C. Çağrı CINGI
M. Çağrı KARAKURUM
Kerem URAL
Arif KURTDEDE
Murat GÜZEL
A. Evren HAYDARDEDEOĞLU
Şükrü KÜPLÜLÜ
Pages
207–209
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, as a practical note, the IC assay was very simple, easy and quick to use for serological testing and screening of neosporosis both for large and small volume of herds.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Serodiagnosis of bovine neosporosis in 60 cows in Ankara was evaluated by a commercially produced solid phased immunoassay principle, immunocomb.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Serum samples were taken from aborted (n=12) and non-aborted (n=48) cows in three different locations of Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, as a practical note, the IC assay was very simple, easy and quick to use for serological testing and screening of neosporosis both for large and small volume of herds.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Serodiagnosis of bovine neosporosis in 60 cows in Ankara was evaluated by a commercially produced solid phased immunoassay principle, immunocomb. Serum samples were taken from aborted (n=12) and non-aborted (n=48) cows in three different locations of Ankara. Six out of 12 aborted cows (50%) were seropositive by immunocomb (IC) assay indicated that neosporosis may be an important cause of abortions in this region. In conclusion, as a practical note, the IC assay was very simple, easy and quick to use for serological testing and screening of neosporosis both for large and small volume of herds.

Özet

Ankara'da 60 sığırda neosporozis'in serodiyagnozu ticari olarak üretilmiş katı fazlı immunoassay prensibi ile çalışan immunocomb (IC) ile belirlendi. Serum örnekleri Ankara'nın üç farklı bölgesinde abort yapmış (n=12) ve abort yapmamış (n=48) ineklerden alındı. Abort yapmış 12 inekten 6'sında (% 50) IC ile belirlenen seropozitivite neosporozis'in bu bölgedeki abortların önemli bir nedeni olabileceğini gösterdi. Sonuç olarak pratikte, IC'nin oldukça basit, kolay ve kısa sürede seri serolojik kontroller için ve gerek büyük gerekse küçük sürülerde neosporozis'in montorizasyonu için kullanılabileceği kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

CINGI, C. Ç., KARAKURUM, M. Ç., URAL, K., KURTDEDE, A., GÜZEL, M., HAYDARDEDEOĞLU, A. E., KÜPLÜLÜ, Ş. (2022). Ankara yöresinde sığır neosporozisinin immunocomb testi ile serolojik tanısı. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 207–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/445164

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anderson ML, Andrianarivo AG, Conrad PA (2000): Neosporosis in cattle. Anim Reprod Sci, 60-61, 417-431
  2. Anonymous (2005): available at http:/www.biogal.co.il. communication date: 23.08.2005 3. Barling KS, McNeil J W, Trompson J A (2002): Association of serologic status for Neospora caninum with postweaning weight gain and carcass measurements in breef calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 217, 1356-1360
  3. Bartels CJM, Wuonda W, Schukken YH (1999): Risk factor for Neospora caninum-associated abortion storms in dairy herds in the Netherlands (1995 to 1997). Theriogenology, 52, 247-257
  4. Bıyıkoğlu G, Öncel T, Bağcı O (2003).: Trakya sığırlarında Neospora caninum 'un seroprevalansı. XIII.Ulusal Parazitoloji Kongresi, 8-12 Eylül 2003, Konya, Turkey
  5. Dijkstra Th, Barkema HW, Hesselink JW, Wouda W (2002): Point source exposure of cattle to Neospora caninum consistent with periods of common housing and feeding and related to the introduction of a dog. Vet Parasitol, 105, 89-98
  6. Dubey JP (1999): Recent advances in Neospora and neosporosis. Vet Parasitol, 84, 349-367
  7. Dubey JP, Lindsay DS (1996): A review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis. Vet. Parasitol, 67, 1-59
  8. Landmann JK, Jillelle D, O'Donoghue PJ, McGowan MR (2002): Confirmation of the prevention of vertical taransmission of Neospora caninum in cattle by the use of embryo transfer. Aust Vet J, 80, 502-503
  9. McAllister MM, Jolley WR, Wills RA, Lindsay DS, McGuire AM, Tranas JD (1998): Oral inoculation of cats with tissue cysts of Neospora caninum. Am J Vet Res, 59,441-444
  10. Part J, Fecteau G, Fortin M, Marsolais G (1998): Seroepidemiologic study of N.caninum in dairy herds. JAVMA, 213, 1595-1598
  11. Sevgili M, Altas MG, Keskin O (2003): Şanlıurfa yöresinde sığırlarda Neospora caninum 'un seroprevalansı. XHI.Ulusal Parazitoloji Kongresi, 8-12 Eylül 2003, Konya, Turkey
  12. Thurmond MC, Hietala SK (1997): Effect of Neospora caninum infection on milk production of first-lactation dairy cows. JAVMA, 210, 672-674
  13. Wouda W, Dijkstra Th, Kramer AHM, Maanen Cvan, Brinkhof JMA (1999): Seroepidemiological evidence for a relationship between Neospora caninum infections in dogs and cattle. Int J Parasitol, 29, 1677-1682.