Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Effect of different diluents on the motility of turkey semen during cryopreservation

Hindi spermasının dondurulmasında farklı sulandırıcıların spermatozoa motilitesi üzerine etkisi

Pages
35–38
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the obtained results, glucose extender provided better environment for turkey semen undergoing cryopreservation than the others (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different extenders on sperm motility in cryopreservation of turkey semen.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some spermatological parameters of collected semen was assessed and mean ejaculate volume (ml), sperm motility (%) and sperm concentration (xlO9/ml) were recorded as 0.28±2.8, 84.8±1.12 and 5.1±0.34 respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the obtained results, glucose extender provided better environment for turkey semen undergoing cryopreservation than the others (p
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different extenders on sperm motility in cryopreservation of turkey semen. Semen was collected from five toms by manual massage method twice a week for five weeks. Some spermatological parameters of collected semen was assessed and mean ejaculate volume (ml), sperm motility (%) and sperm concentration (xlO9/ml) were recorded as 0.28±2.8, 84.8±1.12 and 5.1±0.34 respectively. Pooled semen were divided into four equal parts and diluted 1:3 with extenders (Graham, Glucose, Ringer and Tris + Glucose) containing 10% Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and equilibrated at 4 °C for 90 min. Samples were frozen at -120 ° C on liquid nitrogen vapour for 15 min. Sperm motility after dilution was averaged 74±2.6, 78±2.0, 84±2.2, 62±2.9 % and post-thaw motility was 31±2.4, 40.5±2.8, 17±2.0, 11±1.4 % respectively. According to the obtained results, glucose extender provided better environment for turkey semen undergoing cryopreservation than the others (p

Özet

Bu çalışma, hindi spermasının dondurulmasında farklı sulandırıcıların çözüm sonrasında spermatozoa motilitesi üzerine etkisini araştırmak amacı ile yapılmıştır. Çalışmada kullanılan beş adet hindiden sperma, beş hafta süresince haftada iki kez, masaj yöntemi ile alındı. Hindilerden alman nativ spermanın bazı spermatolojik özellikleri değerlendirildi ve ortalama ejekülat miktarı (ml), motilite (%) ve yoğunluk (xlO9/ml) sırasıyla 0.28±2.8, 84.8±1.12 ve 5.1±0.34 olarak belirlendi. Değerlendirmeleri yapılan sperma 4 eşit parçaya bölünerek 1:3 oranında; %10 Dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) içeren Graham, Glikoz, Ringer ve Tris+Glikoz sulandırıcı­ları ile sulandırılıp +4 °C de 90 dakika alışıma tabi tutulduktan sonra, -120 ° C de sıvı azot buharında 15 dakikada donduruldu. Sulan­dırma sonrası ortalama motilite değerleri sırasıyla % 74±2.6, 78±2.0, 84±2.2, 62±2.9 ve çözdürme sonrasında ise % 31±2.4, 40.5±2.8, 17±2.0, 11±1.4 olarak elde edildi. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre glikoz tabanlı sulandırıcının hindi spermasının dondurularak saklanmasında diğer sulandırıcılara göre daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği saptandı (pO.001).

🔖

Cite This Article

VARIŞLI, Ö., YAVAŞ, İ., AKÇAY, E., TEKİN, N., BUCAK, M. N. (2022). Effect of different diluents on the motility of turkey semen during cryopreservation. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 35–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/445126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Alkan S, Pabuççuoğlu S, Baran A, Özdaş B, İleri K (1998): BPSE ve PBS sulandırıcılarının hindi spermasının soğukta saklanması ve fertilite üzerine etkisi. İstanbul Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 24,213-222. 2.Akçay E, Tekin N, Selçuk M, Çevik M (1997): Hindi spermasının değişik sulandırıcılarda 4°C'de saklanması. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 44, 137-149. 3.Akçay E, Varışlı Ö, Tekin N (2006). Fertilizing ability of turkey semen diluted with simple sugar-based extenders after cooled storage. XII European Poultry Conference, 11-13 September Verona / Italy (accepted, in press). 4.Bakst MR, Sexton TJ (1979): Fertilizing capacity and ultrastructure of fowl and turkey spermatozoa before and after freezing. J Reprod Fertil, 55, 1-7. 5.Bakst MR, Cecil HC (1992): Effect of bovine serum 19.albumin on motility and fecundity of turkey spermatozoa before and after storage. J Reprod Fertil, 94, 287-293. 6.Blanco JM, Gee G, Wildt DE, Tselutin K and Donoghue AM (2000) Semen cryopreservation in poultry and non-domestic species: a comparative approach to understanding the fundamentals of avian spermatozoa cryobiology. Br Poult Sci, 41, 6-7. 7.Blanco JM, Gee G, Wildt DE and Donoghue AM (2000): Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in poultry, eagle and peregrine falcon spermatozoa. Biol Reprod, 63, 1164-1171. 8.Dimitrov SG, Georgiov SK and Atanasov VK (2000): A new diluent (I8_s) and method for freezing turkey semen: fertility data. Br Poult Sci, 41,11. 9.Donoghue AM. Wishart JG (2000): Storage of poultry semen. Anim Reprod Sci, 62, 213-232. 10.Gill SP and Barbato GF (2006): Cryopreservation of Rooster sperm: influence of genotyypes and methodologies. Erişim:http://www.fass.org/fass01/pdfs/ Gill, pdf 03.02.2006 11.Giesen AF, Sexton TJ (1983):Beltsville poultry semen extender 9. Effect of storage temperature on turkey semen held eighteen hours. Poult Sci, 62, 1305-1311. 12.Graham EF, Nelson DS, Schmehl MK (1982a): Development of extender and techniques for frozen turkey semen. 1. development. Poult Sci, 61, 550-557. 13.Graham EF, Nelson DS, Schmehl MK (1982b): Development of extender and techniques for frozen turkey semen. 2. fertility trials. Poult Sci, 61, 558-563. 14.Graham JW and Palmer FH (1986): The effect of cryopreservation at -196° C on the viability of fowl and turkey spermatozoa assessed in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci, 10,317-324. 15.Han XF, Niu ZY, Liu FZ and Yang CS (2005): Effect of diluents, cryoprotectans, equlibration time and thawing temperat