Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3

Isolation of Salmonella spp. in cage birds in Ankara

Ankara İli’ndeki kafes kuşlarında Salmonella türlerinin izolasyonu

Pages
201–203
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To prevent from a probably outbreak of Salmonellosis, hygiene and protection rules must be carefully taken.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study; 271 of cage birds fecal samples, collected from several aviaries in city of Ankara, were aimed to analysis for presence of Salmonella.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In final of the study, 1 of 182 canary feces samples (1%), 1 of 20 Indian nightingale feces samples (5%) and 1 of 5 wild finch feces samples (20%) were found positive for Salmonella.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To prevent from a probably outbreak of Salmonellosis, hygiene and protection rules must be carefully taken.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study; 271 of cage birds fecal samples, collected from several aviaries in city of Ankara, were aimed to analysis for presence of Salmonella. The classical culture method was applicated for isolation of Salmonella from the fecal samples collected. The isolates were identified in level of species by Salmonella Polyvalan “O” Antiserum and these isolates, belong to B serogroup, were detected by Salmonella Group Specific antisera. In final of the study, 1 of 182 canary feces samples (1%), 1 of 20 Indian nightingale feces samples (5%) and 1 of 5 wild finch feces samples (20%) were found positive for Salmonella. Isolation of Salmonella spp. from cage birds compose the risk for bird, breeder and environmental health. To prevent from a probably outbreak of Salmonellosis, hygiene and protection rules must be carefully taken.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Ankara İli’nde yer alan çeşitli kuşhanelerden toplanan 271 kafes kuşu dışkı örneğinin Salmonella varlığı yönünden incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Toplanan dışkı örneklerine Salmonella izolasyonu amacıyla klasik kültür yöntemi uygulanmıştır. İzolatlar, cins düzeyinde Salmonella Polyvalan “O” Antiserumu ile identifiye edilmiştir ve Salmonella Grup Spesifik antiserumlar ile bu izolatların B serogrubunda yeraldıkları belirlenmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, kuş türleri arasında 182 kanarya dışkı örneğinden 1’i (%1) , 20 Hint bülbülü dışkı örneğinden 1’i (%5) ve 5 yabani saka dışkı örneğinden 1’i (%20) Salmonella yönünden pozitif bulunmuştur. Kafes kuşlarından Salmonella izolasyonu; kuş, yetiştirici ve çevre sağlığı açısından risk teşkil etmektedir. Olası bir Salmonella salgınının önüne geçilmesi için, hijyen ve korunma ile ilgili kuralların titizlikle yerine getirilmesi gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OK, Ç. A., YARDIMCI, H. (2022). Isolation of Salmonella spp. in cage birds in Ankara. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 3, 201–203. https://ajindex.com/articles/445003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Arda M (2000): Temel Mikrobiyoloji
  2. Baskı. Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara
  3. Arda M, Esendal ÖM, Akay Ö, Keskin O, İzgür M (1995): Tavuk Salmonellosis’inin teşhisinde propylene glycol’lü yeni bir besiyerinin kullanılması. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 42, 91-96
  4. Aydın N, Başkaya H, Minbay A. (1978): Yabani güvercinlerin Salmonella Gallinarum portörlüğü üzerinde araştırmalar. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 25, 554-567
  5. Bisping W, Amtsberg G (1988): Colour Atlas for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Pathogens in Animals. Paul Parey Scientific Publishers, Berlin and Hamburg
  6. Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R, Swaminathan B (2000): Salmonella nomenclature. J Clin Microbiol, 38, 2465-2467
  7. Craven SE, Stern NJ, Line E, Bailey JS, Cox NA, Fedorka-Cray P (2000): Determination of the incidence of Salmonella spp., Campylobacter jejuni and Clostridium perfringens in wild birds near broiler chicken houses by sampling Intestinal droppings. Avian Dis, 44, 715-720
  8. Dorrestein GM, Buitelaar MN, Hage Van Der MH, Zwart P (1985): Evaluation of a bacteriological and mycological examination of psittacine birds. Avian Dis, 29, 951-962
  9. Fricker CR (1987): The isolation of Salmonellas and Campylobacters. J Appl Bacteriol, 63, 99 -116
  10. Friend M (1999): Salmonellosis. 99-109 In: F Milton, JC Franson (Eds): Field Manual of Wildlife Diseases: General Field Procedures and Diseases of Birds. US Geological Service, Washington DC
  11. Hernandez J, Bonnedahl J, Waldenström J, Palmgren H, Olsen B (2003): Salmonella in birds migrating through Sweden. Emerg Inf Dis 9, 753- 755
  12. Hooijmeijer J, and Dorrestein GM (1997) Pigeons and Doves, Chapter 50 In: Avian Medicine and Surgery, RB Altman, SL Clubb, Dorrestein GM and Quesenberry K (eds). WB Saunders, Philadelphia etc. pp 886-909
  13. Hudson, CR, Quıst C, Lee MD, Keyes K, Dodson SV, Morales C, Sanches S, White DG, Maurer JJ (2000): Genetic relatedness of Salmonella isolates from nondomestic birds in Southeastern United States. J Clin Microbiol. 38, 1860 -1865
  14. İzgür M (2002): Salmonella İnfeksiyonları. 41-53. In: M. İzgür, M. Akan (Eds), Kanatlı Hayvan Hastalıkları, Medisan Yayınevi, Ankara
  15. Kapperud G, Rosef O (1983): Avian wildlife reservoir of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni, Yersinia spp., and Salmonella spp. In Norway. Appl Environ Microbiol, 45, 375-380
  16. Krieg NR, Holt JG (1984): Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Volume I. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, USA
  17. Petrak ML (1969): Diseases of Ca