SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3

Ot sazanının (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Valenciennes 1844) Türkiye’deki durumu

The status of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Valenciennes 1844) in Turkey

Mine Uzbilek KIRKAĞAÇ
Pages
217–221
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, it is my aim to provide some information on different studies relating to grass carp introduction in Turkey and explain in their introduction the factors that inhibit and encourage its development and give some suggestions supported by related literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Val. 1844) among other Chinese carps has been receiving worldwide attention as a biological control agent for aquatic vegetation and as a source of food.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The grass carp was first introduced outside its native area for aquaculture and aquatic management purposes after 1945 and in Turkey after 1972.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, it is my aim to provide some information on different studies relating to grass carp introduction in Turkey and explain in their introduction the factors that inhibit and encourage its development and give some suggestions supported by related literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Val. 1844) among other Chinese carps has been receiving worldwide attention as a biological control agent for aquatic vegetation and as a source of food. The benefits of using grass carp for plant control include its long term effects, constant feeding activity on invasive macrophytes, low long term costs and the potential for conversion of weed biomass to fish protein. The grass carp was first introduced outside its native area for aquaculture and aquatic management purposes after 1945 and in Turkey after 1972. In this paper, it is my aim to provide some information on different studies relating to grass carp introduction in Turkey and explain in their introduction the factors that inhibit and encourage its development and give some suggestions supported by related literature.

Özet

Ot sazanı diğer Çin sazanları içinde su bitkilerinin mücadelesinde biyolojik kontrol ajanı ve besin kaynağı olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Ot sazanını su bitkileri mücadelesinde kullanımının faydaları, sabit beslenme aktivitesi ile su bitkileri üzerindeki etkilerinin uzun süreli olması, uzun dönemde maliyetin düşük olması ve bitki biyomasını hayvansal proteine çevirme potansiyelidir. Ot sazanı yerel alanı dışına 1945 yılından sonra akvakültür ve su yönetimi amaçlarıyla tanıtılmış, ülkemize ise 1972 yılından sonra getirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, ot sazanının ülkemizdeki tanıtımına ilişkin değişik çalışmaların ve tanıtımlarındaki sınırlayıcı ve teşvik edici faktörlerin ortaya konması ve ilgili literatürlere dayanarak bazı önerilerin verilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRKAĞAÇ, M. U. (2022). Ot sazanının (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Valenciennes 1844) Türkiye’deki durumu. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 3, 217–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/444946

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Altınayar G, Ertem B, Yıldırım S (1994): Su yabancıotları ile biyolojik savaşımda Çin sazanı (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.)’nın kullanılması üzerinde değerlendirmeler. DSİ İşl ve Bak Dai Yabancıot Savaşımı ve Bitkisel Kaplama Şube Müd, Ankara, 81 s
  2. Appelbaum S, Uland B (1979): Intensive rearing of grass carp larvae Ctenopharyngodon idella (Val. 1844) under controlled conditions. Aquaculture, 17, 175-179
  3. Baran İ, Seçer S (1979): Sakaryabaşı Balık Üretim ve Araştırma İstasyonundaki Yoğun Bitki Populasyonunun Biyolojik Mücadelesinde Ot Balığı (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.) kullanılmasıyla ilgili uygulamalar. Vet Hek Derg, 49, 1-9
  4. Bohl M. (1979): Disease control and reproduction of grass carp in Germany. Proceeding of the grass carp conference ed. by J.V. Shireman,256 p
  5. Chapman D.C, Wayna A.H, Jackson U.T (1987): Phosphorus retention by grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) fed sapo pond weed (Potamogeton pectinatus). Aquaculture 65, 221-225
  6. Colle D. E, Shireman J.V (1980): Coefficients of condition for largemouth bass, bluegill and reader sunfish in hydrilla-infested lakes. Trans Am Fish Soc, 109,521
  7. Dabrowski K, Poczyczynski P (1988): Comparative experiments on starter diets for grass carp and common carp. Aquaculture, 69, 317-332
  8. Demir N, Kırkağaç M (2006): Bir ot sazanı (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Val) yavru yetiştirme havuzunun fitoplankton kompozisyonu ve biyokütlesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi,12,51-55
  9. Horvath L, Tamas G, Tölg I (1984): Special methods in pond fish husbandary. Akamediai Kiado, Budapest, 148 pp
  10. Huisman A. E (1979): The culture of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.) under artificial conditions. From the Proc of the World Symp on Finfish Nutrition and Fishfeed Technology, Vol. 1, 492-498
  11. Jhingran V.G, Pullin R.S.V (1988): A Hatchery Manual for the Common, Chinese and Indian Major Carps. Asian Development Bank International Center for Living Aquatic resources Management, Philippines, 191 pp
  12. Kırkağaç M, Atay D (2001): The reproduction of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val., 1844) under artificial conditions and rearing to size that can be utilized in biological weed control. J Agri Sci, 7, 89-96
  13. Kırkağaç M. U, Pulatsü S (2001a): The estimation of phosphorus retention by grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val., 1844) fed Potamogeton pectinatus, L, J Agri Sci, 7, 6-8
  14. Kırkağaç M. U, Pulatsü S (2001b): A preliminary study on the effects of vegetation elimination by grass carp (Cte