Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 2

A comparison of camelina meal and soybean meal degradation during incubation with rumen fluid as tested in vitro

Ketencik küspesi ile soya küspesinin in vitro rumen yıkımlanabilirliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
157–161
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, no differenceswere observed between nutrients and feed x time interaction of CP degradability of CM and soybean meal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Camelina meal is a new by-product that remains after oil extraction for biodiesel production and might beconsidered as an alternative protein source to soybean meal in animal nutrition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In vitro disappearance at 4, 12 and 24 h of incubationshowed significant differences between camelina meal and soybean meal.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, no differenceswere observed between nutrients and feed x time interaction of CP degradability of CM and soybean meal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Camelina meal is a new by-product that remains after oil extraction for biodiesel production and might beconsidered as an alternative protein source to soybean meal in animal nutrition. The objective of the present study was to determinethe chemical composition and in vitro degradation of camelina meal compared to soybean meal. Feed samples were collected from acommercial feed mill. To estimate ruminal digestion, in vitro nutrients disappearance of camelina meal and soybean meal wasdetermined using ruminal fluid that was collected at a local slaughterhouse. In vitro disappearance at 4, 12 and 24 h of incubationshowed significant differences between camelina meal and soybean meal. Soybean meal showed higher DM and NDF degradationcompared to camelina meal. On the opposite, CP degradation of camelina meal exactly to increase. In conclusion, no differenceswere observed between nutrients and feed x time interaction of CP degradability of CM and soybean meal. Thereby, it’s concludedthat, the CM might be used in ruminant feeds with soybean meal which is common used in rations.

Özet

Ketencik küspesi, biyoyakıt üretimi sırasında yağın ekstraksiyonuyla arta kalan bir yan üründür ve hayvan beslemede soya küspesine alternatif bir protein kaynağı olarak düşünülebilmektedir. Bu çalışma, ketencik küspesinin besin madde bileşiminin ve in vitro yıkımlanabilirliğinin soya küspesi ile karşılaştırılmasını amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada kullanılan yem örnekleri ticari bir yem fabrikasından temin edilmiştir ve ardından besin madde bileşimleri belirlenmiştir. Yem hammaddelerinin rumendeki yıkımlanabilirliklerinin belirlenmesi, yerel mezbahadan alına rumen sıvısının in vitro ortamda kullanılması suretiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. İnkubasyonun 4., 12. ve 24. saatlerinde gruplar arasında önemli farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir. Kuru madde ve NDF yıkımlanabilirliği soya küspesinde yüksek değere sahip iken, HP yıkımlanabilirliği ketencik küspesinde daha fazla bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak ketencik küspesinin ve soya küspesinin besin madde bileşimi ve yem x zaman etkileşimi açısından HP sindirilebilirlik düzeyleri arasında önemli bir farklılığın tespit edilmemiştir. Dolayısıyla, ketencik küspesinin rasyonlarda yaygın olarak yer alan soya küspesi ile birlikte protein kaynağı olarak kullanılabileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CALIK, A., YILDIZ, G., SIZMAZ, S., SIZMAZ, Ö. (2022). A comparison of camelina meal and soybean meal degradation during incubation with rumen fluid as tested in vitro. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 63 - Sayı: 2, 157–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/444698

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acamovic T, Gilbert C, Lamb K, Walker KC (1999): Nutritive value of Camelina sativa meal for poultry. Brit Poultry Sci, 40, 27-41
  2. Almeida FN, Htoo JK, Thomson J, Stein HH (2013): Amino acid digestibility in Camelina products fed to growing pigs. Can J Anim Sci, 93, 335-343
  3. Ankom Technology (2005): In vitro true digestibility using the DAISYII incubator. [Online] Available: http://www.ankom.com/media/documents/IVDMD_0805_ D200.pdf [2015 Feb. 02]
  4. AOAC International (2000): Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD
  5. Aziza AE, Quezada N, Cherian G (2010): Antioxidative effect of dietary Camelina meal in fresh, stored, or cooked broiler chicken meat. Poultry Sci, 89, 2711-2718
  6. Cappellozza BI, Cooke RF, Bohnert DW, Cherian G, Carroll JA (2012): Effects of Camelina meal supplementation on ruminal forage degradability, performance, and physiological responses of beef cattle. J Anim Sci, 90, 4042-4054
  7. Colombini S, Glen Broderick A, Galasso I, Martinelli T, Rapetti L, Russoc R, Reggianic R (2014): Evaluation of Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz meal as an alternative protein source in ruminant rations. J Sci Food Agric, 94, 736-743
  8. Deckardt K, Metzler-Zebeli BU, Zebeli Q (2015): Processing barley grain with lactic and tannic acid ameliorates rumen microbial fermentation and degradation of dietary fibre in vitro. J Sci Food Agric, DOI:10.1002/jsfa.7085
  9. Dixon RM, Hosking BJ (1992): Nutritional value of grain legumes forruminants. Nutr Res Rev, 5, 19-43
  10. Gatlin DM, Barrows FT, Brown P, et al. (2007): Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds: a review. Aquacult Res, 38, 551-579
  11. Hall M, Mertens DR (2012): A ring test of in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility: Analytical variability and sample ranking. J Dairy Sci, 95, 1992-2003
  12. Halleux H, Lassaux S, Renzoni R, Germain A (2008): Comparative life cycle assessment of two biofuels ethanol from sugar beet and rapeseed methyl ester. Int J Life Cycle Ass, 13, 184-190
  13. Hurtaud C, Peyraud JL (2007): Effects of feeding Camelina (seeds or meal) on milk fatty acid composition and butter spreadability. J Dairy Sci, 90, 5134-5145
  14. Klevenhusen F Deckardt K, Sizmaz Ö, Wimmer S, Muro-Reyes A, Khiaosa-Ard R, Chizzola R, Zebeli Q (2015): Effects of black seed oil and Ferula elaeochytris supplementation on ruminal fermentation as tested in vitro with the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec) Anim Prod Sci - http://dx.doi.or