Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 2

Antioxidant activities, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of honey collected from different botanical origins

Farklı botanik kaynaklardan elde edilen balların antioksidan aktiviteleri, toplam fenolikleri ve flavonoid içerikleri

Pages
133–136
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, it is possible to say that the antioxidant, phenolic, and flavonoid values arehigh, which is a good indicator of the quality and naturalness of honey

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to determine the presence of antioxidant capacity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents in six different types (multiflora, pine, chestnut, sunflower, acacia, citrus) and eventually 65 samples of honey from different parts of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pollen analysis of all honey samples in the laboratory was carried out to determine the purity (> 65-70%) of the plant source.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, it is possible to say that the antioxidant, phenolic, and flavonoid values arehigh, which is a good indicator of the quality and naturalness of honey
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:65 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine the presence of antioxidant capacity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents in six different types (multiflora, pine, chestnut, sunflower, acacia, citrus) and eventually 65 samples of honey from different parts of Turkey. Pollen analysis of all honey samples in the laboratory was carried out to determine the purity (> 65-70%) of the plant source. Total phenolic content determined in honey samples was found the highest value in pine honey 166.46 ± 5.80 (mgGAE / 100 g honey) while the lowest value was found in flower honey with (106.04 ± 9.55). The level of flavonoid contents of the groups was lowest on the flower and citrus honey (1.3 ± 0.2 and 1.6 ± 0.1) and the highest value were on chestnut and pine (2.7±0.4 and 2.8 ± 0.2) were detected. Comparing the radical scavenger activity in honey groups, the activity of chestnut honey was the highest (100.54 ± 22.72). The results of this study show that the phytochemical structure and biological activity of honey are completely different from each other depending on the plant source. On the other hand, it is possible to say that the antioxidant, phenolic, and flavonoid values arehigh, which is a good indicator of the quality and naturalness of honey

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin çeşitli bölgelerinde üretilmiş 6 farklı çeşit (yayla, çam, kestane, ayçiçeği, akasya, narenciye) toplam 65 bal numunesinde toplam fenolik asit, flavonoid düzeyi ve total antioksidan aktivitesi incelenmiştir. Laboratuvarda tüm bal numunelerinin polen analizi yapılarak bitki kaynağının saflık derecesi (>%65-70) tespit edilmiştir. Bal örneklerinde belirlenen total fenolik içeriği 166,46 ± 5,80 (mgGAE/100g bal) ile en yüksek değer çam balına ait iken, en az 106,04 ± 9,55 ile çiçek balında bulunmuştur. Gruplar arası flavonoid içeriği en düşük düzey çiçek ve narenciye balında sırasıyla (1,3 ± 0,2 ve 1,6 ± 0,1), en yüksek değer ise kestane ve çam balında (2,7±0,4 ve 2,8 ± 0.2) tespit edilmiştir. Bal gruplarında yapılan radikal süpürücü aktivitesinin karşılaştırılmasında ise kestane balın aktivitesinin en yüksek olduğu (100,54 ± 22,72) ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışmanın sonuçları, balın fitokimyasal yapısı ve biyolojik aktivitesinin bitki kaynağına bağlı olarak birbirinden tamamen farklı olduğunu göstermektedir. Diğer taraftan bu değerlerin yüksek olması balın kalitesinin ve doğallığının iyi bir göstergesi olacağını söylemek mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKER, D., NİSBET, C. (2022). Antioxidant activities, total phenolic and flavonoid contents of honey collected from different botanical origins. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 2, 133–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/444473

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Al-Mamary M, Al-Meeri A, Al-Habori M (2002): Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of different types of honey. Nutr Res, 22, 1041-47
  2. Alzahrani H, Boukraa L, Bellik Y, et al (2012): Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of three varieties of honey from different botanical and geographical origins. Global J Health Sci, 4, 191-196
  3. Atrott J, Henle T (2009): Methylglyoxal in Manuka honey – correlation with antibacterial properties. Czech J Food Sci, 27, 163-165
  4. Bertoncelj J, Dobersek U, Jamnik M, et al (2007): Evaluation of the phenolic content, antioxidant activity and colour of Slovenian honey. Food Chem, 105, 822–28
  5. Buba F, Gidado A, Shugaba A (2013): Analysis of biochemical composition of honey samples from North-East Nigeria. Biochem Anal Biochem, 2, 139-40
  6. Ching H, Hou YC, Hsiu SL, et al (2002): Influnce of honey on the gastrointestinal metabolism and disposition of glycyrhizm and glycyrhetic acid in rabbits. Biol Pharm Bull, 25, 87-91
  7. Das A, Mukherjee A, Dhar P (2013): Characterization of antioxidants and antioxidative properties of various unifloral honeys procured from West Bengal, India. IOSRJESTFT, 7, 56-638
  8. Demirezen D, Aksoy A (2010): Determination of heavy metals in bee honey using by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). GU J Sci, 18, 569-575
  9. Dimins F, Kuka P, Augspole I (2010): Characterisation of honey antioxidative properties. International Conference of Food Innova, 28-29- Oct. Latvia
  10. Dong R, Zheng Y, Xu B (2013): Phenolic profiles and antioxidant capacities of Chinese unifloral honeys from different botanical and geographical sources. Food Bioprocess Technol, 6, 762–770
  11. Ertürk Ö, Şahin H, Kolaylı S, et al (2014): Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of East Black Sea. Turk J Biochem, 39, 99–106
  12. Gheldof N, Wang XH, Engeseth NJ (2002): Identification and quantification of antioxidant components of honeys from various floral sources. J Agric Food Chem, 50, 5870- 5877
  13. Giorgi A, Madeo M, Baumgartner J, et al (2011): The Relationships between phenolic content, pollen diversity, physicochemical information and radical scavenging activity in honey. Molecules, 16, 336-342
  14. Güler A, Bakan A, Nisbet C, et al (2007): Determination of important biochemical proreties of honey to discriminate pure and adulterated honey with sucrose (Saccharumofficinarum L.) syrup. Food Chem, 105, 1119–1125
  15. Javanmardia J, Stushnoff C, Locke E, et al (2003): Antioxidant act