Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 4

The mandibles of the Honamli and Hair goat (Capra hircus); a geometric morphometric study

Honamlı ve Kıl keçisi (Capra hircus) mandibula’sı; geometrik morfometrik bir çalışma

Pages
321–328
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, it was remarkable that male goats clustered clearly compared to female goats in terms of the breed factor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to analyze mandible of the Honamli and Hair goats according to the sex factor by geometric morphometric methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 36 adult goat mandibles including 9 males and 9 females for each breed, were used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it was remarkable that male goats clustered clearly compared to female goats in terms of the breed factor.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze mandible of the Honamli and Hair goats according to the sex factor by geometric morphometric methods. A total of 36 adult goat mandibles including 9 males and 9 females for each breed, were used in the study. After the mandibles were photographed from the left lateral side, 10 homolog landmarks were marked. Generalized Procrustes, Relative Warp, and Principal Component Analysis were performed for the data of landmark coordinates. In the study, the first principal component explained 28.752% and 37.325% of the total shape difference in the Honamli and Hair goat, respectively. In the analysis made among goat breeds according to the sex factor, the first principal component explained 40.809% of the total shape difference in females and 30.486% of the total shape difference in males. Consequently, the Hair goat showed a significant sex difference compared to the Honamli goat. Besides, it was remarkable that male goats clustered clearly compared to female goats in terms of the breed factor.

Özet

Çalışmada geometrik morfometrik metotlarla Honamlı ve Kıl Keçisi mandibula’sının cinsiyet faktörü ile birlikte analiz edilmesi amaçlandı. Çalışmada her ırk için 9’ar adet erkek ve dişi olmak üzere toplamda 36 adet ergin keçi mandibula’sı kullanıldı. Mandibula’lar sol lateral yönden fotoğraflandıktan sonra 10 adet homolog landmark işaretlendi. Landmark koordinat verileri General Procrustes, Relative Warp ve Temel Bileşenler analizine tabi tutuldu. Çalışmada Honamlı ve Kıl Keçisinde cinsiyetler arası yapılan karşılaştırmada birinci temel bileşen toplam şekil farklılığının sırasıyla %28,752 ve %37,325’ini açıkladı. Cinsiyet faktörüne göre keçi ırkları arasında yapılan analizde ise birinci temel bileşen dişilerde toplam şekil farklılığının %40,809’unu, erkeklerde %30,486’sını açıkladı. Sonuç olarak Kıl Keçilerinin Honamlı Keçilerine göre oldukça belirgin bir cinsiyet farklılığı göstermesi, ırk faktörü bakımından erkek keçilerin, dişi keçilere kıyasla net bir şekilde kümeleşmesi dikkat çekiciydi.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRASLAN, Y., ÖZGEL, Ö., GÜRBÜZ, İ., ZÜMRE, Ö. (2022). The mandibles of the Honamli and Hair goat (Capra hircus); a geometric morphometric study. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 4, 321–328. https://ajindex.com/articles/444436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (2013): A field comes of age: Geometric morphometrics in the 21st century. Hystrix, 24, 7-14
  2. Ansell WFH (1972): Order Artiodactyla. In The mammals of Africa. An identification manual Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington
  3. Batubara A, Noor RR, Farajallah A, et al (2011): Morphometric and phylogenic analysis of six population Indonesian local goat. J Ani Sci Tech, 34, 165-74
  4. Bigoni L, Velemínská J, Brůžek J (2010): Threedimensional geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. Homo, 61, 16-32
  5. Clark KM (1995): The later prehistoric and protohistoric dog: the emergence of canine diversity. Archaeozoologia, 7, 9-32
  6. Elmaz Ö, Saatçi M, Mamak N, et al (2012): The determination of some morphological characteristics of Honamli goat and kids, defined as a new indigenous goat breed of Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 18, 481-5
  7. Ensminger ME, Parker RO (1986): Sheep and goat Science, Fifth Edition. Danville, Illinois: The Interstate Printers and Publishers Inc
  8. Figueirido B, Serrano-Alarcón SJ, Palmqvist P (2012): Geometric morphometrics shows differences and similarities in skull shape between the red and giant pandas. J Zool, 286, 293-302
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization; FAO (2007): Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic resources and Interlaken Declaration on Animal Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy
  10. Frost SR, Marcus LF, Bookstein FL, et al (2003): Cranial allometry, phylogeography, and systematics of largebodied papionins (primates: Cercopithecinae) inferred from geometric morphometric analysis of landmark data. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol, 275, 1048-1072
  11. Guintard C, Lallemand M (2003): Osteometric study of metapodial bones in sheep (Ovis aries, L. 1758). Ann Anat, 185, 573-583
  12. Gündemir O, Özkan E, Dayan MO, et al (2020): Sexual analysis in turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) neurocranium using geometric morphometric methods. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 44, 681-687
  13. Gürbüz İ, Aytek Aİ, Demiraslan Y, et al (2020): Geometric morphometric analysis of cranium of wolf (Canis lupus) and German shepherd dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 26, 525-532
  14. Hammer Q, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001): PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol Electron, 4, 9
  15. Kimmerle EH, Ross A, Slice D (2008): Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the cra