SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 2

The morphological characteristics of the Muradiye Dönek pigeon, a native Turkish genetic resource

Türkiye’nin yerli gen kaynağı, Muradiye Dönek güvercinlerinin morfolojik özellikleri

Fatma Tülin ÖZBAŞER
Eser Kemal GÜRCAN
Evren ERDEM
Mehmet İhsanSOYSAL
Pages
107–112
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The differences between the mean values of body weight and wingspan (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to investigate the morphological characteristics of Muradiye Dönek pigeon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The animal material of this study consisted of 100 pigeons (50 females and 50 males) from seven pigeon enterprises.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The differences between the mean values of body weight and wingspan (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the morphological characteristics of Muradiye Dönek pigeon. It is a local animal genetic resource and cultural heritage and has an important place among the genotypes of domestic pigeons in Turkey. The animal material of this study consisted of 100 pigeons (50 females and 50 males) from seven pigeon enterprises. In the study,morphological characteristics were evaluated and morphometric measurements were determined. Body plumage colors of pigeons were determined as black (70%), red (16%) and blue (14%) galaca. In some birds, the yellow beaks and nails may bear black spots, which pigeon breeders refer to as ‘zikir’. The term ‘biyik’ (mustache) is used when black feathers appear among the white feathers on the head, and the term ‘kemer’ (belt) is used when black feathers appear in the tail. The differences between the mean values of body weight and wingspan (P

Özet

Bu çalışma, Muradiye Dönek güvercinlerinin morfolojik özelliklerinin araştırılması amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu güvercinler Türkiye’nin yerli hayvan gen kaynağı olup kültürel mirasıdır ve evcil güvercin genotipleri arasında önemli bir yere sahiptir. Araştırmanın hayvan materyalini yedi işletmede bulunan toplam 100 adet (50 dişi ve 50 erkek) güvercin oluşmuştur. Çalışmada güvercinlerin morfolojik özellikler incelenmiş ve morfometrik özellikler belirlenmiştir. Güvercinlerde tüy rengi siyah (%70), kırmızı (%16) ve mavi (%14) galaca olarak belirlenmiştir. Bazı kuşlarda sarı renkli gaga ve tırnaklarda güvercin yetiştiricilerinin 'zikir' olarak adlandırdığı siyah noktalar görülmektedir. Baş bölgesinde beyaz tüyler arasında siyah tüyler göründüğünde "bıyık", kuyrukta ise bu siyah tüyler "kemer" olarak adlandırılır. Kuşlarda uçuş özelliğini etkilediği düşünülen canlı ağırlık ve kanat açıklığı (P

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZBAŞER, F. T., GÜRCAN, E. K., ERDEM, E., İhsanSOYSAL, M. (2022). The morphological characteristics of the Muradiye Dönek pigeon, a native Turkish genetic resource. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 2, 107–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/444420

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Atasoy F, Erdem E, Hacan Gücüyener Ö (2013): Ankara ilinde yetiştirilen taklacı güvercinlerde (Columba livia domestica) morfolojik özelliklerin belirlenmesi. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 60,135-143
  2. Balcı F, Ardıçlı S, Alpay F, et al (2018): The determination of some morphological characteristics of Bursa Oynarı pigeon breed. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 65, 349-355
  3. Bartels T (2003): Variations in the morphology, distribution and arrangement of feathers in domesticated birds. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol, 298, 91-108
  4. Brighta JA, Marugán-Lobónc J, Cobbe S N, et al (2016): The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors. PNAS, 113, 5352-5357
  5. Erdem H, Konyalı C, Savaş T (2018): Edremit kelebek güvercinlerinin morfolojik karakterizasyonu. ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fak Derg, 6, 93-100
  6. Hollender WF, Miller WJ (1981): Hereditary variants of behavior and vision in the pigeon. Iowa St J Res, 55, 323-331
  7. Jacquin L, Recapet C, Bouche P, et al (2012): Melaninbased coloration reflects alternative strategies to cope with food limitation in pigeons. Behav Ecol, 23, 907-915
  8. Jilly B (2006): The possibilities of orientation and finding the way back. Anim Welf Ethol Hou Syst, 2, 10-33
  9. Johnston RF (1990): Variation in size and shape in pigeons, Columba livia. Wilson Bull, 102, 213-225
  10. Johnston RF (1992): Evolution in the Rock dove: Skeletal morphology. The Auk, 109, 530-542
  11. Johnston RE, Janiga M (1995): Feral Pigeons. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford
  12. Jones MP, Pierce KE, Ward D (2007): Avian vision: a review of form and function with special consideration to birds of prey. J Exotic Pet Med, 16, 69–87
  13. Kulemeyer C, Asbahr K, Gunz P, et al (2009): Functional morphology and integration of corvid skulls – a 3D geometric morphometric approach. Front Zool, 6, 1-14
  14. Levi WM (1972): Making Pigeon Pay. Levi Publications, Australia
  15. Liang X, Yu J, Wang H, et al (2018): Post-hatching growth of the pectoralis muscle in pigeon and ıts functional ımplications. Anat Rec (Hoboken), 301, 1564-1569
  16. Matin GR (2017): What Drives Bird Vision? Bill control and predator detection overshadow flight. Front Neurosci, 11, 1-16
  17. Mercieca S, Jilly B, Gáspárdy A (2017): Connection among body measurements and flying speed of racing pigeon. Int J Agri Sci Food Technol, 3, 9-18
  18. Murton RK, Thearle RJP, Thompson J (1972): Ecological studies of the Feral pigeon, Columba livia var
  19. Population, breeding biology and methods of control. J Appl Ec