Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 4

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from nonhealing wound in a canary bird (Serinus canaria domestica)

Pages
407–409
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study underline the necessity for further investigations on the epidemiological role of canary birds as potential reservoirs of MRSA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Little is known about the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a canary bird (Serinus canaria domestica).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The bird was treated by offering drinking water medicated with an injectable enrofloxacin formulation at 200 mg/L over 10 days period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study underline the necessity for further investigations on the epidemiological role of canary birds as potential reservoirs of MRSA.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Little is known about the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a canary bird (Serinus canaria domestica). Although MRSA in a canary bird was previously reported, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first full description of the isolation and antibiotic resistance pattern of MRSA in this pet bird. A swab was taken from the nonhealing wound on the lateral thigh of a four-year-old, caged, housed alone, male canary bird. After the identification of Staphylococcus aureus, the antibiotic susceptibility profile of the isolate was obtained by the disk diffusion test. According to the resistance to Oxacillin and Cefoxitin, the isolate was identified as MRSA. The mecA gene was confirmed by PCR. The bird was treated by offering drinking water medicated with an injectable enrofloxacin formulation at 200 mg/L over 10 days period. Two weeks after therapy, intensive contraction of the wound was observed with a size reduction. A week later, the complete epithelization of the wound defect was verified. In this study, we could not confirm the source of infection in a canary bird, but we believe that transmission was from wild birds when the cage was putting out in order to allow the bird to sunbathe or more likely via contact with the owner. The results of this study underline the necessity for further investigations on the epidemiological role of canary birds as potential reservoirs of MRSA.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAKSIMOVIĆ, Z., MAKSIMOVIĆ, A., LUTVIKADIĆ, I., RIFATBEGOVIĆ, M. (2022). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from nonhealing wound in a canary bird (Serinus canaria domestica). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 68 - Sayı: 4, 407–409. https://ajindex.com/articles/444411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Andreoletti O, Budka H, Buncic S, et al (2009): Assessment of the Public Health significance of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in animals and foods Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazards. EFSA J, 993, 1-73
  2. Boseret G, Losson B, Mainil JG, et al (2013): Zoonoses in pet birds: Review and perspectives. Vet Res, 44
  3. Briscoe JA, Morris DO, Rankin SC, et al (2008): Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-associated dermatitis in a Congo African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus erithacus). J Avian Med Surg, 22, 336–343
  4. CLSI (2012): Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S22. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
  5. Devriese LA, De Herdt P, Desmidt M, et al (1994): Pathogenic staphylococci and staphylococcal infections in canaries. Avian Pathol, 23,159–162
  6. Evans EE (2011): Zoonotic Diseases of Common Pet Birds: Psittacine, Passerine, and Columbiform Species. Vet Clin Exot Anim, 14, 457–476
  7. Kutkowska J, Turska-Szewczuk A, Kucharczyk M et al (2019): Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococci in fecal samples of birds from South-Eastern Poland. BMC Vet Res, 15, 1–8
  8. Leonard FC, Markey BK (2008): Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals: A review. Vet J, 175, 27– 36
  9. Loncaric I, Lepuschitz S, Ruppitsch W et al (2019): Increased genetic diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from companion animals. Vet Microbiol, 235,118–126
  10. Markey B, Leonard F, Archambault M et al (2013): Staphylococcus species. 105-115. In: Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Mosby Elsevier
  11. Morgan M (2008): Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and animals: Zoonosis or humanosis? J Antimicrob Chemother, 62, 1181–1187
  12. Paterson GK, Larsen AR, Robb A et al (2012): The newly described mecA homologue, mecALGA251, is present in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a diverse range of host species. J Antimicrob Chemother, 67, 2809–2813
  13. Pomba C, Rantala M, Greko C et al (2017): Public health risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals. J Antimicrob Chemother, 72, 957–968
  14. Rankin S, Roberts S, O’Shea K et al (2005): Panton valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin positive MRSA strains isolated from companion animals. Vet Microbiol, 108, 145– 148
  15. Rubin JE, Ball KR, Chirino-Trejo M (2011): Antimic