Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of different mathematical functions for fitting growth curves of ascitic and healthy broiler chickens

Pages
289–295
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comparison of the growth curves showed that the ascitic chickens reach the inflection point of the curve earlier than their healthy counterparts (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ascites syndrome (AS) causes major economic losses in commercial meat-type chickens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 5584 body weight (BW) records belonging to 823 chickens (381 male and 442 female) from a paternal pure Arian broiler line were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comparison of the growth curves showed that the ascitic chickens reach the inflection point of the curve earlier than their healthy counterparts (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ascites syndrome (AS) causes major economic losses in commercial meat-type chickens. The objectives of the current study were to select the best non-linear growth curve functions (GCFs) of the ascitic and healthy chickens, and to investigate the association of ascites incidence with the growth pattern. A total of 5584 body weight (BW) records belonging to 823 chickens (381 male and 442 female) from a paternal pure Arian broiler line were used. The birds were categorized into; healthy male and female, ascitic male and female. Five GCFs including Logistic, Gompertz, Lopez, Richards, and Von baretanalffy were fitted to the BW records of all groups, separately. After the estimation of growth curve parameters for all the chicks individually, the effect of sex and health status on the growth curve parameters were assessed. The results revealed that the Richards function is the best for all the groups. Comparison of the growth curves showed that the ascitic chickens reach the inflection point of the curve earlier than their healthy counterparts (P

🔖

Cite This Article

NEMATZADEH, R., ALIJANI, S., HASANPUR, K., OLYAYEE, M., SHODJA, J. (2022). Comparison of different mathematical functions for fitting growth curves of ascitic and healthy broiler chickens. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 3, 289–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/444388

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Aggrey S (2002): Comparison of three nonlinear and spline regression models for describing chicken growth curves. Poult Sci, 81, 1782-1788
  2. Aggrey S (2009): Logistic nonlinear mixed effects model for estimating growth parameters. Poult Sci, 88, 276-280
  3. Arango J, Van Vleck LD (2002): Size of beef cows: early ideas, new developments. Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science, 237
  4. Baghbanzadeh A, Decuypere E (2008): Ascites syndrome in broilers: physiological and nutritional perspectives. Avian Pathol, 37, 117-126
  5. Balog J, Anthony N, Cooper M, et al (2000): Ascites syndrome and related pathologies in feed restricted broilers raised in a hypobaric chamber. Poult Sci, 79, 318-323
  6. Currie RJ (1999): Ascites in poultry: recent investigations. Avian Pathol, 28, 313-326
  7. Gupta A (2011): Ascites syndrome in poultry: a review. Worlds Poult Sci J, 67, 457-468
  8. Hasanpur K, Nassiry M, Salekdeh GH, et al (2015): Influence of ascites syndrome on growth pattern of chickens reared at normal or cold ambient temperature. Ann Anim Sci, 15, 373-385
  9. Hassanzadeh M, Buyse J, Toloei T, et al (2013): Ascites syndrome in broiler chickens: A review on the aspect of endogenous and exogenous factors interactions. J Poult Sci, 51, 229-241
  10. Julian RJ (1993): Ascites in poultry. Avian Pathol, 22, 419- 454
  11. Kaplan S, Gürcan EK (2018): Comparison of growth curves using non-linear regression function in Japanese quail. J Appl Anim Res, 46, 112-117
  12. Kaufmann KW (1981): Fitting and using growth curves. Oecologia, 49, 293-299
  13. Kuhi HD, Kebreab E, Lopez S, et al (2003): An evaluation of different growth functions for describing the profile of live weight with time (age) in meat and egg strains of chicken. Poult Sci, 82, 1536-1543
  14. Lee L, Atkinson D, Hirst AG, et al (2020): A new framework for growth curve fitting based on the von Bertalanffy Growth Function. Scientific Reports, 10, 1-12
  15. Nurmeiliasari N (2010): Ascites Incidence in Broilers. J Sain Peternak Indones, 5, 59-64
  16. Pavlidis H, Balog J, Stamps L, et al (2007): Divergent selection for ascites incidence in chickens. Poult Sci, 86, 2517-2529
  17. Porter T, Kebreab E, Kuhi HD, et al (2010): Flexible alternatives to the Gompertz equation for describing growth with age in turkey hens. Poult Sci, 89, 371-378
  18. Rabinovitch M (2008): Molecular pathogenesis of pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Clin Invest, 118, 2372- 2379
  19. Richards F (1959): A flexible growth function for