Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1

Prevalence and rapid identification of Salmonella Infantis in broiler production in Turkey

Türkiye'deki broyler üretiminde Salmonella Infantis'in yaygınlığı ve hızlı tanısı

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that it is a fast, reproducible and low-cost alternative to the gold standard method by detecting the S.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, the prevalence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Infantis (S.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Infantis) and other serovars were investigated in samples collected from commercial broiler chicken flocks in Turkey according to the ISO 6579:2002/Amd 1:2007, Annex D, standard method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that it is a fast, reproducible and low-cost alternative to the gold standard method by detecting the S.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2002 · 848 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the present study, the prevalence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Infantis (S. Infantis) and other serovars were investigated in samples collected from commercial broiler chicken flocks in Turkey according to the ISO 6579:2002/Amd 1:2007, Annex D, standard method. Furthermore, previously developed S. Infantis-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods with primers targeting fljB, fliC, IMP1-IMP2-IMP3 and sinI were conducted in different media (BPW, MRSV, MKTTN, XLD, and XLT4 agars) and during four incubation stages (6, 12, 18, and 24 h) of the ISO 6579 procedure to develop rapid and reliable diagnosis method. One-hundred thirty-three (15.6%) Salmonella strains were isolated from a total of 848 samples (240 cecal swabs, 200 cloacal swabs, 190 intestinal contents, 59 feed, 39 dust, and 120 litter). The serovar distribution of isolated strains was as follows: S. Infantis, 88.70%; S. Agona, 2.3%; S. Kentucky 1.50, S. Hadar 1.50, and S. Tennessee 1.50; S. Mbandaka 0.75 %, S. Montevideo 0.75 %, S. Enteritidis 0.75 %, S. Adelaide 0.75 %, S. Liverpool 0.75 %, and S. Derby 0.75 %. Primers targeting fljB, fliC, and IMP1-IMP2-IMP3 were not able to detect all S. Infantis isolates, therefore, a novel PCR technique was developed and validated in the study. It was concluded that it is a fast, reproducible and low-cost alternative to the gold standard method by detecting the S. Infantis isolates on the 3rd day at the earliest by PCR (sinI PCR). using primers specific to S. Infantis species.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de bulunan ticari tavuk sürülerinden toplanan toplam 848 örnek (240 sekal ve 200 kloakal svap, 190 bağırsak içeriği, 59 yem, 39 toz ve 120 altlık), ISO 6579: 2002 / Amd 1: 2007, Ek D standart yöntemine göre S. Infantis ve diğer serovarların prevalansı yönünden araştırıldı. Buna ek olarak, hızlı ve güvenilir bir teşhis amacıyla, S. Infantis'e özgü genleri (fljB, fliC, IMP1-IMP2-IMP3 ve sinI) hedefleyen PCR temelli metodlar (PCR ve multipleks PCR), ISO 6579 prosedürünün farklı inkübasyon aşamaları (6, 12, 18 ve 24 saat) ve ortamlarında (BPW, MSRV, MKTTN, XLD ve XLT4 agarları) kullanıldı. Toplam 848 örnekten 133(%15,6) Salmonella suşu izole edildi. İzole edilen suşların serovar dağılımı, S. Infantis % 88,70; S. Agona % 2,3; S. Kentucky % 1,50, S. Hadar % 1,50 ve S. Tennessee % 1,50; S. Mbandaka % 0,75, S. Montevideo % 0,75, S. Enteritidis % 0,75, S. Adelaide % 0,75, S. Liverpool % 0,75 ve S. Derby % 0,75'dir. Bu çalışmada, fljB, fliC ve IMP1-IMP2-IMP3 primerleri tüm S. Infantis izolatlarını tespit edemedi ve bu nedenle yeni bir PCR tekniği geliştirilip validasyonu yapıldı. S. Infantis türüne spesifik primerlerler yapılan (sinI PCR) PCR ile S. Infantis izolatlarını en erken 3. günde tespit ederek altın standart yönteme alternatif hızlı, tekrarlanabilir ve düşük maliyetli metot olduğu sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAPICIER, Ö. Ş., SAREYYÜPOĞLU, B. (2022). Prevalence and rapid identification of Salmonella Infantis in broiler production in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/444387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akiba M, Kusumoto M, Iwata T (2010): Rapid identification of Salmonella enterica serovars, Typhimurium, Choleraesuis, Infantis, Hadar, Enteritidis, Dublin and Gallinarum, by multiplex PCR. J Microbiol Methods, 85, 9-15
  2. Amini K, Zahraci TS, Gholamreza N, et al (2010): Molecular detection of invA and spv virulence genes in Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from human and animals in Iran. Afr J Microbiol Res, 4, 2202-2210
  3. Asai T, Ishihara K, Harada K, et al (2007): Long-term prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Infantis in the broiler chicken industry in Japan. Microbiol Immunolol, 51, 111-115
  4. Berchieri A, Barrow PA (1990): Further studies on the inhibition of colonization of the chicken alimentary tract with Salmonella typhimurium by pre-colonization with an avirulent mutant. Epidemiol Infect, 104, 427-441 5. Carraminana JJ, Rota C, Agustin I, et al (2004): High prevalence of multiple resistance to antibiotics in Salmonella serovars isolated from a poultry slaughterhouse in Spain. Vet Microbiol, 104, 133-139
  5. Correa IMO, Pereire LQ, Silva IGO, et al (2018): Comparison of three diagnostic methods for Salmonella enterica serovars detection in chicken rinse. Pesq Vet Bras, 38, 1300-1306
  6. Duc VM, Nakamoto Y, Fujiwara A, et al (2019): Prevalence of Salmonella in broiler chickens in Kagoshima, Japan in 2009 to 2012 and the relationship between serovars changing and antimicrobial resistance. BMC Vet Res, 15, 108
  7. El-Sharkawy H, Tahoun A, El-Galiel A, et al (2017): Epidemiological, molecular characterization and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from chicken farms in Egypt. Gut Pathog, 9, 8
  8. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2019): The European Union One Health 2018 zoonoses report. EFSA J, 17, e05926
  9. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2019): Salmonella control in poultry flocks and its public health impact. EFSA J, 17, 5596
  10. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2020): The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2017/2018. EFSA J, 18, e06007
  11. Gal-Mor O, Boyle EC, Grassl GA (2014): Same species, different diseases: how and why typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica serovars differ. Front Microbiol, 5, 1-10
  12. Gosling RJ, Breslin M, Fenner J, et al (2016): An in-vitro investigation into the efficacy of disinfectants used in the duck industry against