SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1

Chemical, rheological, and organoleptic analysis of cow and buffalo milk mozzarella cheese

Abdul Rauf BHAT
Atta Hussain SHAH
Mansoor AYOOB
Muhammad Faisal AYOOB
Muhammad Mohsin ALI
Muhammad FAYAZ
Pages
51–60
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The present study concludes that buffalo milk is better to produce mozzarella cheese with higher calorific values, better yield, and with more economic values, while cow milk is better to produce mozzarella cheese with the more proteinous, enhanced stretchiness, and better organoleptic quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was aimed to determine the impact of milk source on mozzarella cheese's chemical, rheological, and organoleptic characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 10 lots of cow and buffalo milk mozzarella cheese each were prepared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The present study concludes that buffalo milk is better to produce mozzarella cheese with higher calorific values, better yield, and with more economic values, while cow milk is better to produce mozzarella cheese with the more proteinous, enhanced stretchiness, and better organoleptic quality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research was aimed to determine the impact of milk source on mozzarella cheese's chemical, rheological, and organoleptic characteristics. A total of 10 lots of cow and buffalo milk mozzarella cheese each were prepared. Prominent milk source influence on the chemical characteristics and calorific values of mozzarella cheese was determined. A decrease in moisture content and an increase in fat, protein, ash, and calorific values were noted in mozzarella cheese against their respective milk. Moisture content in cow milk mozzarella cheese (CMM) was considerably higher than buffalo milk mozzarella cheese (BMM). Average fat, ash content and calorific values appeared considerably high in BMM cheese compared to CMM cheese but protein content was recorded inverse and statistically non-significant (P>0.05). The average meltability was slightly higher in CMM cheese and the stretchiness of CMM cheese appeared significantly high from that of BMM cheese. BMM cheese was remarkably high in yield in contrast to that of CMM cheese. Appearance, flavor, and body/texture scores were slightly higher in CMM cheese as compared to BMM cheese. Regardless, the average benefit computed for BMM cheese was high in comparison to CMM cheese, the differences among them were statistically non-significant. The present study concludes that buffalo milk is better to produce mozzarella cheese with higher calorific values, better yield, and with more economic values, while cow milk is better to produce mozzarella cheese with the more proteinous, enhanced stretchiness, and better organoleptic quality.

🔖

Cite This Article

BHAT, A. R., SHAH, A. H., AYOOB, M., AYOOB, M. F., ALI, M. M., FAYAZ, M. (2022). Chemical, rheological, and organoleptic analysis of cow and buffalo milk mozzarella cheese. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 1, 51–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/444358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abegaõ LMG, Pagani AAC, Zílio SC, et al (2016): Measuring milk fat content by random laser emission. Sci Rep, 6, 35119
  2. Ah J, Tagalpallewar GP (2017): Functional properties of Mozzarella cheese for its end use application. J Food Sci Technol, 54, 3766–3778
  3. Al-Amiri HA, Al-Otaibi JA, Al-Foudari MY, et al (2009): The nutritive value of selected commonly consumed Kuwaiti dishes. Int J Food Sci Nutr, 60, 668–676
  4. Anonymous (1981): The Water Buffalo: New prospect for underutilized animal. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C
  5. AOAC (2000): Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg
  6. Bertola NC, Califano AN, Bevilacqua AE, et al (1996): Effect of Freezing Conditions on Functional Properties of Low Moisture Mozzarella Cheese. J Dairy Sci, 79, 185–190
  7. Bezie A, Regasa H (2019): The Role of Starter Culture and Enzymes/ Rennet for Fermented Dairy Products Manufacture-A Review. Nutr Food Sci, 9, 21–27
  8. Bhattarai RR, Acharya PP (2010): Preparation and Quality Evaluation of Mozzarella Cheese from Different Milk Sources. J Food Sci Technol Nepal, 6, 94–101
  9. BSI (1990): Methods for chemical analysis of liquid milk and cream. Determination of the nitrogen content of liquid milk. Part 5.2, Routine method. British Standards Institution, London
  10. Cais-Sokolińska D, Pikul J (2009): Cheese meltability as assessed by the Tube Test and Schreiber Test depending on fat contents and storage time, based on curd-ripened fried cheese. Czech J Food Sci, 27, 301–308
  11. Clark S, Costello M (2009): Dairy products evaluation competitions. In: The Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products Springer US. 43–71
  12. Dave RI, Sharma P, Muthukumarappan K (2003): Effects of Starter Culture and Coagulating Enzymes on Viscoelastic Behavior and Melt of Mozzarella Cheese. J Food Sci, 68, 1404–1410
  13. El-Gawad MAMA, Nawal SA (2011): Cheese Yield as Affected by some Parameters. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment, 10, 131–153
  14. El Owni OAO, Osman SE (2009): Evaluation of chemical composition and yield of mozzarella cheese using two different methods of processing. Pak J Nutr, 8, 684–687
  15. Ibrahim AA (2003): Effect of Processing and Storage Condition on the Chemical Composition and Microbial Quality of White Soft Cheese. University of Khartoum, Sudan
  16. Jeewanthi RKC, Lee NK, Mok BR, et al (2016): Comparative analysis of mozzarella cheeses fortified with whey protein hydrolysates, diverse in hydrolysis time and concentrat