SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2005 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1

Results of endourethral bulking treatment with macroplastique implantation device in patients with stress urinary incontinence

Stres üriner inkontinans olgularında makroplast implantasyon cihazı ile üretral "bulking" tedavisinin sonuçları

Can TUYGUN
Muzaffer EROĞLU
Abdurrahim İMAMOĞLU
Ahmet KİPER
Ufuk ÖZTÜRK
Pages
1–4
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For the first session, mean quality of life score was 32.5 in the preoperative period and became 13.75 postoperatively (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Patients with, in cases of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were evaluated according to the ease of use and the efficacy of macroplastique implantation device which makes it possible to use injectable material without the need for endoscopic procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Fifty-two female patients who were diagnosed with primary stress in-continence from January 1999 to June 2003 were injected with a mean volume of 6.8 cc of mac-roplastique, 14 locally, and 38 under general anesthesia through macroplastique implantation device.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For the first session, mean quality of life score was 32.5 in the preoperative period and became 13.75 postoperatively (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Patients with, in cases of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were evaluated according to the ease of use and the efficacy of macroplastique implantation device which makes it possible to use injectable material without the need for endoscopic procedures. Materials and methods: Fifty-two female patients who were diagnosed with primary stress in-continence from January 1999 to June 2003 were injected with a mean volume of 6.8 cc of mac-roplastique, 14 locally, and 38 under general anesthesia through macroplastique implantation device. Results: Following the first application, 20 patients were dry (no pad), 19 patients were socially continent (one pad or less), 13 patients were incontinent (more than one pad). For patients who remained incontinent, second application was made. Following the second session, 10 patients were dry, 4 patients were socially continent and 4 patients remained incontinent. For the first session, mean quality of life score was 32.5 in the preoperative period and became 13.75 postoperatively (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma stres inkontinans olgularında enjektabl materyallerin endoskopik girişim ge-rektirmeden uygulanabilmesi amacıyla geliştirilmiş olan makroplast implantasyon cihazının kul-lanım kolaylığını ve hastalar üzerindeki etkisini incelemek için planlandı. Gereç ve yöntem: Ocak 1999- Haziran 2003 tarihleri arasında stres inkontinans tanısı konulan ve çalışma grubuna alınan 52 hastaya ortalama 6.8 ml makroplast enjekte edildi, işlem 14 hastada lokal, 38 hastada genel anestezi altında makroplast implantasyon cihazı kullanılarak gerçekleşti-rildi.; Bulgular: ilk uygulama sonunda 52 hastanın 20'sinde tam kür, 19'unda anlamlı iyileşme (bir ped ve altı) tesbit edildi. Onüç hastada inkontinans (bir ped üzeri) devam etti. İnkontinansı devam - eden hastalara ikinci uygulama yapıldı. İkinci uygulama sonunda 10 hastada tam kür, 4 hastada anlamlı düzelme görülürken 4 hasta inkontinan kaldı, ilk uygulamadan sonra 32.5 olan ortalama yaşam kalitesi skoru 13.75 olarak bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TUYGUN, C., EROĞLU, M., İMAMOĞLU, A., KİPER, A., ÖZTÜRK, U. (2022). Results of endourethral bulking treatment with macroplastique implantation device in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 1, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/444019

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Wolen LH. Incontinence in youg healthy nulliparous women. J Urol 1969;101:545-549
  2. Concensus Panel. Urinary incontinence in adults. JAMA 1989; 261:2685-2690
  3. Stanton SL. Stress incontinence. Why and how operation work. Urol Clin North Am 1985;2:279-284
  4. Burch JL. Cooper’s ligament urethrovesical suspension for stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 100:764-774
  5. Alcalay M, Monga QA, Stanton SL. Burch colposuspension. A 10-20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102:740-745
  6. Duckett JRA. Theuseofperiurethralinjectablesinthetreatmentof genuine stress incontinenece. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105: 390-396
  7. Khullar V,Cordozo LD, Abbott D ve ark. Gax collagen in the treatment of urinary incontinence in elderly women. A 2 year follow up. Br j Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:96-99
  8. Raz S, Ericsa DR: SEAPI QMM incontinence classıficationsystem.Neurology and Urodynamics 1992;11:192
  9. Malizia AA Jr, Reiman HM, Myers RP, et al. Migration and granulomatous reaction after periurethral injection of polytef (Teflon).JAMA1984;24:3277-3281
  10. Leth PM. Spread of teflonparticlesfromperiurethrallyinjectedteflonpastetopulmonarytissue.UgeskrLaeger1994;156:981-982(abstract)
  11. Stothers L, Goldenberg SL. Delayed hypersensitivity and systemic arthralgia following transurethral collagen injection for stress urinary incontinance. J Urol 1998;159:1507-1509
  12. Pannek J, Brands FH, Senge T. Particle migration after transurethral injection of carbon coated beads for stress urinary incontinance. J Urol 2001;166:1350-1353
  13. Ritts RE. Re: Particle migration after transurethral injection of carbon coated beads for stress urinary incontinance. J Urol 2002; 167:1804-1805
  14. Aaranson IA, Tames RA, Greene WB, ve ark. Endoscopic treatment for reflux.EurUrol1993;23:394-399
  15. SheriffMK,FoleyS,McFarlaneJ,etal.Endosscopiccorrectionofintractable stress incontinence with silicone micro-implants. Eur Urol 1997; 32:284-288
  16. Usman F, Hanella S. A single transurethral Macroplastique injection as primary treatment for stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynecol 1998;18:56-60
  17. Koelbl K, Saz V, DorflerD,etal.Transurethralinjectionofsiliconemicroimplants for intrinsic urethral sphincter deficiency.ObstetGynecool 1998;92:332-336
  18. Monga AK, Robinson D, Stanton SL. Periurethral collagen injections for genuine stress urinary incontinence: a 2 year follow up. Br J Urol 1995;76:156-160
  19. Hanella SM, Hall V, Duckett JRA et al. A multicentre evaluation of