Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2007 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3

Dead process standardisation related with hospice care style

Ölüm sürecini standardize edilmesi ile hospiz yaklaşım tarzının ilişkisi

Pages
110–115
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If neighbourhood of death believe the necessities of organ transplantation, autopsy and corpse cadaver for anatomic education, they will give a permission to give an organ, to make an autopsy and to keep corpse for educational status at anatomy department.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Summary: Hospice is well known organization with guidance, supportive and supply to necessities for neighbourhoods and patient who have a disease which cause to happen death in terminal times.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It could decrease the negative mood, such as anxiety and depression and improve the psychological state for patient and relatives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If neighbourhood of death believe the necessities of organ transplantation, autopsy and corpse cadaver for anatomic education, they will give a permission to give an organ, to make an autopsy and to keep corpse for educational status at anatomy department.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Summary: Hospice is well known organization with guidance, supportive and supply to necessities for neighbourhoods and patient who have a disease which cause to happen death in terminal times. Team working physicians make possible no problem living during hospice process with emphatic, unconditional positive approachable manner and opinion to sense. Objective: The aim of this study is searched the infl uence of hospice care on the life quality and psychological state of mortal inpatients. Advantage of hospice service is determined whether continuous after death with living mourning and treating negative situation at the neighbourhood. Discussion: Hospice care can raise the life quality, subjective support, and life satisfaction of aged mortal inpatients. It could decrease the negative mood, such as anxiety and depression and improve the psychological state for patient and relatives. It can be discussed rescued ache and other suff ers from terminal disease with death. Cause of death and manner of death are debated interference with hospice care. Conclusion: The process of death is needed to standardise procedure which is understood and simple done by everybody. If neighbourhood of death believe the necessities of organ transplantation, autopsy and corpse cadaver for anatomic education, they will give a permission to give an organ, to make an autopsy and to keep corpse for educational status at anatomy department.

Özet

Giriş: Hospiz ölüme götüren hastalığın son evresinde hasta ve yakınlarına rehberlik ve destek veren, gereksinimlerini gideren tarzda örgütlenme olarak bilinir. Takım olarak çalışan hekimlerin empati, koşulsuz olumlu yaklaşım tarzı ve duygulara açık olma ile hospiz sürecini sorunsuz olarak yaşaması mümkündür. Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı hospiz bakımının yaşam kalitesi ve ölümcül hastanın psikolojik durumu üzerine etkisini araştırmaktır. Hospiz hizmetinin yararlarının ölümden sonra yas durumunun devam edip etmemesi ve olumsuz durumların tedavisi olup olmadığını da belirlemeye yöneliktir. Tartışma: Hospiz bakımı ölümcül hastalığı olanların yaşam kalitesini artırabilir, nesnel olmayan destekleyebilir ve yaşam başarısını artırabilir. Bunaltı ve depresyon gibi olumsuz mizacı azaltabilir ve hasta ve yakınlarının psikolojik durumlarını geliştirebilir. Ölümcül hastalığın ağrı ve diğer sıkıntılarından ölümle kurtulma hali tartışılabilir. Ölüm sebebi ve hali hospiz bakımla ilişkisi tartışıldı. Sonuç: Ölüm süreci herkes tarafından kolay yapılabilen ve anlaşılan standardize yöntemlerle olması gerekir. Eğer ölü yakınları organ nakli, otopsi ve anatomi eğitimi için cesetin kadavra olması gerekliliğine inanırsa, onlar organ vermeye, otopsi yaptırmaya ve anatomi bölümünde eğitim için cesetin bekletilmesine gerekli izni verecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bilge, Y. (2022). Dead process standardisation related with hospice care style. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3, 110–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/443909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Okyavuz ÜH, Ölümcül hastalık tanısı almak: Bir yaşam krizi kötü haber verilmeli mi? Kriz Dergisi 2003; 11/3: 29–35
  2. Bilge Y, Adli Tıp, Üçbilek Matbaası, 2005; s. 54.56.57.60–63,94–130,141–155, Ankara
  3. Namal A, Ölümü yaşayabilmek için bir seçenek: Hospizler, III. Tıbbi Etik Sempozyumu, Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu Matbaası, 1998; s 137,144, Ankara
  4. Zalenski RJ, Raspa R, Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: A Framework for Achieving Human Potential in Hospice. J Palliat Med. 2006; 9:1120-7
  5. Li YQ, Zhang MX, Fu GX, et al, Effect of hospice care on the quality of life and psychological state of aged mortal inpatients. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2006; 31:538-42
  6. Kelly KS, Thompson MF, Waters RD, Improving the way we die: a coorientation study assessing agreement/disagreement in the organization-public relationship of hospices and physicians. J Health Commun. 2006; 11:607-27
  7. Sulmasy DP: Spiritual issues in the care of dying patients: “. it’s okay between me and god”.JAMA. 2006; 296:1385-92
  8. Thompson GN, Chochinov HM, Methodological challenges in measuring quality care at the end of life in the long-term care environment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006; 32:378-91
  9. Kiik R, Sirotkina R: Hospice - the ideology and perspectives in Estonia. Int Nurs Rev. 2006; 53:136-42
  10. Virnig BA, Kind S, McBean M, et al, Geographic variation in hospice use prior to death. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48:1117-25
  11. Bölükbaşı O, Gürpınar S, Ozoran Y: Neden Otopsi Yapmıyoruz? Sendrom 1997;9/2: 90-92
  12. Grabowski DC, Stevenson DG, Huskamp HA, et al, The influence of Medicare home health payment incentives: does payer source matter? Inquiry. 2006; 43:135-49
  13. Christakis NA, and Escarce JJ: Survival of Medicare Patients after Enrollment in Hospice Programs N Engl J Med 1996;335:607
  14. Knops KM, Srinivasan M, Meyers FJ: Patient desires: a model for assessment of patient preferences for care of severe or terminal illness. Palliat Support Care. 2005; 3:289-99
  15. Brumley D, Fisher J, Robinson H, et al, Improving access to clinical information in after hours community palliative care. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2006; 24:27-32
  16. Chen HI, Burnett MG, Huse JT, et al, Recurrent late cerebral necrosis with aggressive characteristics after radiosurgical treatment of an arteriovenous malformation. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:455-60
  17. Pleschberger S: Palliative care in nursing homes-central issues and further research. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2006; 39(5):376-81