Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2008 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4

Mesane kanserinde radikal sistektomi sonrası prognostik faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi

Analysis of prognostic factors in bladder carcinoma treated with radical cystectomy

Pages
226–232
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the pathological stage, the 5-year survival rate was found to be 72.9%, %77.6%, 48.0%, 25.4% and 28.8% for pT0, pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 respectively. (Figure 1; log-rank test, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate variable prognostic factors which might aff ect disease-specific survival in patients who have undergone radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder carcinoma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 241 consecutive patients with invasive bladder carcinoma between 1990 and 2008, all had radical cystectomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the pathological stage, the 5-year survival rate was found to be 72.9%, %77.6%, 48.0%, 25.4% and 28.8% for pT0, pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 respectively. (Figure 1; log-rank test, p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate variable prognostic factors which might aff ect disease-specific survival in patients who have undergone radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 241 consecutive patients with invasive bladder carcinoma between 1990 and 2008, all had radical cystectomy. The clinical and pathological data and clinical outcome were evaluated. The Chi-square test was used to determine the significance of the relationship between the clinical and pathological findings. While disease-specific survival and the association between patient`s parameters and survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and long-rank test respectively. Results: Considering the type of urinary diversion, 97 patients had ileal conduit; 58 patients had orthotopic bladder using ileal segment; and orthotopic mainz pouch was applied to 43 patients. While ureterocutaneostomy and ureterosigmoidostomy were the choice in 22 and 21 patients respectively. The mean age of the patients at receipt of the surgical procedure was 59.8 years (range from 29 to 83 years) and the mean follow-up interval was 34 months (median follow up: 22, SD: 36.66; range from 1 to 175) for patients alive at last follow-up. According to the pathological stage, the 5-year survival rate was found to be 72.9%, %77.6%, 48.0%, 25.4% and 28.8% for pT0, pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 respectively. (Figure 1; log-rank test, p

Özet

Amaç: İnvaziv mesane tümörlerinin tedavisinde bugün için standart tedavi yöntemi radikal sistektomidir. Bu çalışmada, invaziv mesane kanseri nedeniyle radikal sistektomi yapılan 241 hastadaki cerrahi deneyimlerimiz ve uzun dönem takip sonuçlarımız sunulmaktadır. Materyal ve Metodlar: Kliniğimizde 1990 yılından itibaren invaziv mesane kanseri nedeniyle radikal sistektomi yapılan 241 hastanın (214 erkek, 27 bayan) kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Klinik ve patolojik verilerle birlikte, hastaların takip sonuçları da değerlendirilmiştir. Kategorik değişkenler arasındaki ilişkilerin araştırılmasında ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır. Sağkalım oranları Kaplan-Meier metodu ile, hastaların özellikleri ve sağkalım arasındaki ilişki de log-rank testi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Üriner diversiyon tipi olarak 97 hastaya ileal konduit, 58 hastaya ileum segmenti ile ortotopik üriner diversiyon, 43 hastaya mainz pouch II, 22 hastaya üreterokutanostomi ve 21 hastaya ise üreterosigmoidostomi uygulanmıştır. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 59.8 (29 ve 83 yıl arasında) yıldır. Patolojik evrelere göre 5 yıllık genel sağkalım oranları pT0, pT1, pT2, pT3 ve pT4 için sırasıyla %72.9, %77.6, %48.0, %25.4 ve %28.8 olarak tahmin edilmiştir (Şekil 1; log-rank test, p

🔖

Cite This Article

BEDÜK, Y., ERGÜN, G., BALTACI, S., TÜRKÖLMEZ, K., GÖĞÜŞ, C., REŞORLU, B. (2022). Mesane kanserinde radikal sistektomi sonrası prognostik faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4, 226–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/443843

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:10-30
  2. Clark PE, Stein JP, Groshen SG, et al. Radical cystectomy in the elderly. Cancer 2005;103(3):546-52
  3. Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Palapattu GS, et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: A contemporary series from the bladder cancer research consortium. J Urol 2006; 176: 2414-22
  4. Bassi P, Ferrante GD, Piazza N, et al. Prognostic factors of outcome after radical cystectomyfor bladder cancer: a retrospective study of a homogeneous patient cohort. J Urol 1999; 161: 1494-7
  5. Takashi M, Murase T, Mizuno S, et al. Multivariate evaluation of prognostic determinants in bladder cancer patients. Urol Int 1987; 42: 368–74
  6. Haleblian GE, Skinner EC, Dickinson MG, et al. Hydronephrosis as a prognostic indicator in bladder cancer patients. J Urol 1998; 160: 2011–4
  7. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al.: Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: longterm results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 666-75
  8. Prout G, Marshall VF. The prognosis with untreated bladder tumors. Cancer 1956; 9: 551-8
  9. Hautmann RE, Gschwend JE, de Petriconi RC, Kron M, Volkmer BG. Cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: results of a surgery only series in the neobladder era. J Urol. 2006;176(2): 486-92
  10. Ghoneim MA, el-Mekresh MM, el-Baz MA, el-Attar IA, Ashamallah A. Radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder: critical evaluation of the results in 1,026 cases. J Urol 1997; 158(2):393-9
  11. Madersbacher S, Hochreiter W, Burkhard F, et al. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer today a homogeneous series without neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 690-6
  12. Frazier HA, Robertson JE, Dodge RK, Paulson DF. The value of pathological factors in predicting cancerspecific survival among patients treated with radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Cancer 1993; 71: 3993-9
  13. Esrig D, Freeman JA, Elmajian DA, et al. Transitional cell carcinoma involving the prostate with a proposed staging classification for stromal invasion. J Urol. 1996;156(3):1071-6
  14. Soloway MS, Lopez AE, Patel J, et al. Results of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and the effect of chemotherapy. Cancer. 1994; 73: 1926-31
  15. Lerner SP, Skinner DG, Lieskowsky G, et al. The rationale of en bloc pelvic node dissection for bladder cancer p