Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2018 / Cilt: 71 - Sayı: 3

Spondylolisthesis: Etiology, Diagnosis, Clinical Features and Treatmen

Spondilolistezis: Etiyoloji, Tanı, Klinik Özellikler ve Tedavi

Pages
118–126
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We aimed to review current literature regarding the etiology, diagnosis, clinical features and treatment of spondylolisthesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Spondylolisthesis is anterior or posterior shift according to the vertebrae to which a vertebrate is associated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Prevalence is 3-6% and male/ female ratio is 2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We aimed to review current literature regarding the etiology, diagnosis, clinical features and treatment of spondylolisthesis.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Spondylolisthesis is anterior or posterior shift according to the vertebrae to which a vertebrate is associated. It is confronted as a broad clinical spectrum ranging from simple mechanical back pain to progressive neurological deficits and radiological findings. Prevalence is 3-6% and male/ female ratio is 2. The diagnosis of spondylolisthesis is almost always made with direct radiographs. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), other radiological diagnostic methods such as bone scintigraphy are also used in diagnosis or follow-up. Conservative treatment includes activity restriction, rehabilitation of abdominal and paraspinal muscles and hyperlordotic rigid bracing. The main goal is to reduce pain, strengthen the core of the muscles and to provide complete lumber motion. Surgical treatment is usually performed in patients who do not respond to conservative treatment. We aimed to review current literature regarding the etiology, diagnosis, clinical features and treatment of spondylolisthesis.

Özet

Spondilolistezis, bir vertebranın ilişkili olduğu vertebraya göre öne veya arkaya kaymasıdır. Basit mekanik bel ağrısından, ilerleyici nörolojik defisit ve radyolojik bulgulara kadar değişen geniş bir klinik spektrum olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Prevalansı %3-6 arasında ve erkek/kadın oranı: 2’dir.Spondilolistezisin tanısı hemen her zaman direkt grafiler ile konulur. Bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT), manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ve ayrıca kemik sintigrafi gibi diğer radyolojik tanısal yöntemler tanı veya izlemde kullanılmaktadır. Konservatif tedavi aktivite kısıtlaması, abdominal ve paraspinal kaslarının rehabilitasyonu ve hiperlordotik rijid korselemeyi içerir. Tedavide ana hedef; ağrıyı azaltmak, lomber eklem hareket açıklığını tamamlamasının sağlamak ve kor kaslarını güçlendirmektir. Cerrahi tedavi genelllikle konservatif tedaviye cevap vermeyen hastalara uygulanır. Bu derlemede; spondilolistezis etiyolojisi, tanısı, klinik özellikleri ve tedavisine ilişkin güncel literatürün gözden geçirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

MOUSTAFA, E., TUR, B. S. (2022). Spondylolisthesis: Etiology, Diagnosis, Clinical Features and Treatmen. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 71 - Sayı: 3, 118–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/443642

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Metkar U, Shepard N.Conservative management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Semin Spine Surg. 2014;26:225-229.
  2. Haun DW, Kettner NW. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: a narrative review of etiology, diagnosis,and conservative management. J Chiropr Med. 2005;4:206-217. Lonstein JE. Spondylolisthesis in Children Cause, Natural History and Management. Spine. 1999;24:2640-2648. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine, Part I Function, dysfunction, adaptation and enhancement. J Spinal Disord. 1992;5:383-389; discussion 397. Özer AF. Lomber Dejeneratif Disk Hastalığı ve Dinamik Stabilizasyon.1.bs. Pelikan Kitapevi. 2011. Suzer T. Lumbar Segmental Instability and Deformity. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(Supplement:1):20-2820.
  3. Duvorak J, Panjabi MM, Novotny JE, et al. Clinical validation of functional flexion-extension roentgenograms of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1991;16:943- 950. Wollowick AL, Sarwahi V. Spondylolisthesis Diagnosis, Non-Surgical Management and Surgical Techniques.1th Ed. Springer. 2015.
  4. Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, et al. Rothman-Simeone:The Spine. Elsevier.6th Ed.2011.
  5. Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, et al. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:199- 205. Standaert CJ, HerringSA. Spondylolysis: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34:415-422.
  6. Garet M, Reiman MP, Mathers J, et al. Nonoperative Treatment in Lumbar Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review. Sports Health. 2013;5:225-232.
  7. Wynne-Davies R, Scott JH. İnheritance and spondylolisthesis:a radiographic family survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61-B:301-305.
  8. McNeely ML, Torrance G, Magee DJ. A systematic review of physiotherapy for spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Man Ther. 2003;8:80-91. Bridwell KH. The Textbook of Spinal Surgery. 3th Ed.Lippincott Williams& Wilkins.2011.
  9. Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. Diagnosis and conservative management of Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:327–335.
  10. Schuller S, Charles YP, Steib JP. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment and body mass index in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:713–719.
  11. Grannum S, Torrie PAG, Miller A, et al. Risk Factors For the Development of a Mobile Degenerative Spondylolisthesis at L4-L5. Spine Deform. 2015;3:98-104.
  12. Koreckij TD, Fischgrund JS. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:236–241.
  13. Cavalier R, HermanMJ.