SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2019 / Cilt: 72 - Sayı: 2

Clinical Results and Surgical Details of Lamina Terminalis Fenestration in Patients with High Grade Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: One Year Experience of A Single Institute

Yüksek Dereceli Subaraknoid Kanamalı Hastalarda Lamina Terminalis Fenestrasyonunun Klinik Sonuçları ve Cerrahi Detayları: Tek Merkezin Bir Yıllık Tecrübesi

Onur ÖZGÜRAL
Melih BOZKURT
İhsan DOĞAN
Fatih YAKAR
Eyyub SM AL BEYATI
Bilal SHUKURUYEV
Ümit EROĞLU
Pages
218–221
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Lamina terminalis fenestration is an easy and effective procedure that can be applied to provide cerebral relaxation before surgical clipping and reduce the risk of developing hydrocephalus after clipping.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Lamina terminalis fenestration is a method used to reduce hydrocephalus risk secondary to subarachnoid haemorrhage in cerebral aneurysm surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We evaluated 10 patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent surgical clipping for cerebral aneurysm between 2014 and 2015 in our clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Lamina terminalis fenestration is an easy and effective procedure that can be applied to provide cerebral relaxation before surgical clipping and reduce the risk of developing hydrocephalus after clipping.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Lamina terminalis fenestration is a method used to reduce hydrocephalus risk secondary to subarachnoid haemorrhage in cerebral aneurysm surgery. The aim of our article is to report our clinical experience in these patients and examine the short-term results of this procedure. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 10 patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent surgical clipping for cerebral aneurysm between 2014 and 2015 in our clinic. Results: Hydrocephalus developed in three of the 10 patients. One of these three patients had hydrocephalus in the preoperative period. In addition, hydrocephalus regressed in he postoperative period in three patients with hydrocephalus preoperatively. Conclusion: Lamina terminalis fenestration is an easy and effective procedure that can be applied to provide cerebral relaxation before surgical clipping and reduce the risk of developing hydrocephalus after clipping.

Özet

Amaç: Lamina terminalis fenestrasyonu, serebral anevrizma cerrahisinde ameliyat sonrası hidrosefali gelişme olasılığını azaltmak için kullanılan biryöntemdir. Bu yazının amacı, yüksek dereceli subaraknoid kanamalı hastalarda lamina terminalis fenestrasyonunun hidrosefali üzerine kısa dönemsonuçlarını araştırmak ve bu konudaki klinik tecrübemizi aktarmaktır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde 2014-2015 yıllarında serebral anevrizmasına yönelik cerrahi klipaj uyguladığımız 10 yüksek dereceli subaraknoidkanamalı hastayı değerlendirdik.Bulgular: Çalışmamızda değerlendirmeye aldığımız 10 hastadan üçünde hidrosefali gelişti. Bu üç hastadan birinde ameliyat öncesi dönemde dehidrosefali bulunmaktaydı. Ayrıca, preoperatif dönemde hidrosefalisi olan üç hastanın ise postoperatif dönemde hidrosefali tablolarının kaybolduğugözlemlendi.Sonuç: Lamina terminalis fenestrasyonu, gerek cerrahi klipaj öncesi serebral relaksasyonu sağlamak gerekse klipaj sonrası hidrosefali gelişme riskiniazaltmak amacıyla uygulanabilen kolay ve etkili bir işlemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜRAL, O., BOZKURT, M., DOĞAN, İ., YAKAR, F., BEYATI, E. S. A., SHUKURUYEV, B., EROĞLU, Ü. (2022). Clinical Results and Surgical Details of Lamina Terminalis Fenestration in Patients with High Grade Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: One Year Experience of A Single Institute. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 72 - Sayı: 2, 218–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/443559

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Dorai Z, Hynan LS, Kopitnik TA, et al. Factors related to hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:763-771
  2. Sheehan JP, Polin RS, Sheenan JM, et al. Factors associated with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1999;45:112-118
  3. Komotar RJ, Olivi A, Rigamonti D, et al. Microsurgical fenestration of the lamina terminalis reduces the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1403- 1412
  4. Yasargil MG. Microsurgical anatomic features of the lamina terminalis. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:569-570
  5. Kawakami Y, Shimamura Y. Cisternal drainage after early operation of ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurosurgery. 1987;20:8-14
  6. Rhoton AL Jr. The lateral and third ventricles. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1-207
  7. De Divitiis O, Angileri FF, d’Avella D, et al. Microsurgical anatomic features of lamina terminalis. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:563-570
  8. Kreiter KT, Copeland D, Bernardini GL, et al. Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Stroke. 2002;33:200-208
  9. Claassen J, Bernardini GL, Kreiter K, et al. Effect of cisternal and ventricular blood on risk of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid haemorrhage: the Fischer scale revisited. Stroke. 2001;32:2012-2020
  10. Connolly ES Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for health- care professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711-1737
  11. Cesarini KG, Hardemark HG, Persson L. Improved survival after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: review of case management during a 12-year period. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:664-672
  12. Meybodi AT, Miri SM. Microscopic supraciliary approach for terminal laminotomy for treatment of hydrocephalus: a preliminary report of eight cases. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2012;22:599-603.