Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2021 / Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 3

Efficacy of Prognostic Scoring Systems and Neutrophil-to- Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Among Critically Ill Elder Sepsis Patients

Yaşlı Sepsis Hastalarında Prognostik Puanlama Sistemlerinin ve Nötrofil-Lenfosit Oranının (NLO) Etkinliği

Pages
289–295
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Overall, the data of 36 patients were analyzed (mean age: 80.00±6.37 years, female: 58.3%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Several scoring models and biomarkers are available to predict survival among critically ill patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By the end of a 28-day follow-up period, survivors and non-survivors were compared for the study parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Overall, the data of 36 patients were analyzed (mean age: 80.00±6.37 years, female: 58.3%).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Several scoring models and biomarkers are available to predict survival among critically ill patients. However, their accuracy among older adults with sepsis has been questioned. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the currently used prognostic scoring scales and neutrophil-to- lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the prediction of survival among older adults with sepsis. Materials and Methods: The study prospectively included older adults who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis. On admission, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-II, Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, and NLR were calculated. By the end of a 28-day follow-up period, survivors and non-survivors were compared for the study parameters. Results: Overall, the data of 36 patients were analyzed (mean age: 80.00±6.37 years, female: 58.3%). The rate of mortality was 47.3% (n=17). The mean SOFA score and the median NLR on admission were significantly lower in survivors [SOFA: 10.37±2.91, and NLR: 9.64 (11.25)] vs non-survivors [SOFA: 12.82±3.21 and NLR: 14.95 (35.53)] (p

Özet

Amaç: Yoğun bakım hastalarında mortaliteyi tahmin eden birçok puanlama sistemi ve biyobelirteç mevcuttur. Ancak yaşlı sepsis hastalarında kullanılabilirlikleri konusunda netlik bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, yaşlı sepsis hastalarında sağkalımı öngörmede şu anda kullanılan prognostik skorlama ölçeklerini ve nötrofil lenfosit oranını (NLO) değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya yoğun bakım ünitesine sepsis tanısı ile yatırılan yaşlı hastalar prospektif olarak dahil edildi. Başvuru anında Akut Fizyoloji ve Kronik Sağlık Değerlendirmesi-II (APACHE), Sıralı (sepsisle ilişkili) Organ Yetmezliği Değerlendirmesi (SOFA) ve Glasgow koma skoru (GKS) puanı ve NLO hesaplandı. 28 günlük bir takip süresinin sonunda, hastalar “hayatta kalanlar” ve “hayatta kalmayanlar” olarak iki gruba ayrıldı ve çalışma parametreleri yönünden karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Otuz altı hastanın verileri analiz edildi (ortalama yaş: 80,00±6,37 yıl, kadın: %58,3). Ölüm oranı %47,3 (n=17) idi. Başvuru anındaki ortalama SOFA skoru ve medyan NLO, hayatta kalanlarda [SOFA: 10,37±2,91 ve NLR: 9,64 (11,25)], hayatta kalmayanlara [SOFA: 12,82±3,21 ve NLR: 14,95 (35,53)] (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞGÖZ, B. B., AYKAN, M. B., ACAR, R., TAŞÇI, İ. (2022). Efficacy of Prognostic Scoring Systems and Neutrophil-to- Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Among Critically Ill Elder Sepsis Patients. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 3, 289–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/443445

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:304-377
  2. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303-1310
  3. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395:200-211
  4. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:707-710
  5. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818-829
  6. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81-84
  7. Godinjak A, Iglica A, Rama A, et al. Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit. Acta Med Acad. 2016;45:97-103
  8. Nik A, Sheikh Andalibi MS, Ehsaei MR, et al. The Efficacy of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II for Predicting Hospital Mortality of ICU Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018;6:141-145
  9. Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA. 2017;317:290-300
  10. Naqvi IH, Mahmood K, Ziaullaha S, et al. Better prognostic marker in ICU - APACHE II, SOFA or SAP II! Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32:1146-1151
  11. Desai S, Lakhani JD. Utility of SOFA and APACHE II score in sepsis in rural set up MICU. J Assoc Physicians India. 2013;61:608-611
  12. Trancă S, Petrișor C, Hagău N, et al. Can APACHE II, SOFA, ISS, and RTS Severity Scores be used to Predict Septic Complications in Multiple Trauma Patients? J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2016;2:124-130
  13. Knox DB, Lanspa MJ, Pratt CM, et al. Glasgow Coma Scale score dominates the association between admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and 30-day mortality in a mixed intensive care unit population. J Crit C