Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2022 / Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Impar Ganglion Block Effectivity in the Management of Chronic Perineal Pain

Kronik Perineal Ağrı Yönetiminde İmpar Ganglion Blok Etkinliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
107–112
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Significant differences were observed in visual analogue scale and oswestry disability index values before and after the procedure (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Chronic pain is a cause that negatively affects the quality of life and functional capacity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with chronic perineal pain (duration of pain >6 months), who underwent ganglion impar block under fluoroscopy, were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Significant differences were observed in visual analogue scale and oswestry disability index values before and after the procedure (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic pain is a cause that negatively affects the quality of life and functional capacity. As with most chronic pain syndromes, perineal (pelvic) chronic pain requires a multimodal approach. Ganglion impar blockage and neurolysis may be effective in cases that do not respond to conservative treatments. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the effect of ganglion impar block in patients with chronic perineal pain. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with chronic perineal pain (duration of pain >6 months), who underwent ganglion impar block under fluoroscopy, were evaluated retrospectively. Neurolysis was performed after diagnostic block in 5 patients with chronic perineal pain associated with pelvic cancer. Results: The average age of the patients was 48.6±14.6 (28-75) years, 63.3% (19) were female, 36.7% (11) were male. Significant differences were observed in visual analogue scale and oswestry disability index values before and after the procedure (p

Özet

Amaç: Kronik ağrı hayat kalitesi ve fonksiyonel kapasiteyi olumsuz etkileyen bir nedendir. Kronik ağrı sendromlarının pek çoğunda olduğu gibi perineal (pelvik) kronik ağrı da multimodal yaklaşım gerektirir. Konservatif tedavilere yanıt vermeyen olgularda ganglion impar blokajı, nörolizisi etkin olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada kronik perineal ağrılı olgularda ganglion impar blokajının etkinliğini retrospektif olarak değerlendirdik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kronik perineal ağrı yakınması (ağrı süresi >6 ay) olan ve floroskopi rehberliğinde ganglion impar blokajı yapılmış 30 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Pelvik kanser ilişkili kronik perineal ağrısı olan 5 hastada diagnostik blok sonrası nörolizis uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Ortalama hasta yaşı 48,6±14,6 (28-75), %63,3 (19) kadın, %36,7 (11) erkek idi. İşlem öncesi ve sonrası vizüel analog skala ve fonksiyonel bel ağrısı skalası skorlarının karşılaştırmalarında anlamlı azalma gözlenmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALİYEV, D., ÖZGENCİL, G. E., AŞIK, İ., AKKEMİK, Ü. (2022). Evaluation of Impar Ganglion Block Effectivity in the Management of Chronic Perineal Pain. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 1, 107–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/443378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Andromanakos NP, Kouraklis G, Alkiviadis K. Chronic perineal pain: current pathophysiological aspects, diagnostic approaches and treatment. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:2-7.
  2. Maigne JY, Doursounian L, Chatellier G. Causes and mechanisms of common coccydynia: role of body mass index and coccygeal trauma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3072-3079.
  3. Nagpal AS, Moody EL. Interventional Management for Pelvic Pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28:621-646.
  4. Raj PP, Erdine S. Interventional Pain Procedures in the Pelvic and Sacral Regions. In: P.P. Raj and S. Erdine, editors. Pain-Relieving Procedures. 1st ed. Chichester, John Wiley&Sons Limited. 2012. pp. 337-383. doi:https://doi. org/10.1002/9781118300480.ch17 Plancarte R, Amescua C, Patt RB, Allende S. A751 Presacral neurectomy of the ganglion of walther (Ganglion Impar). Anesthesiology. 1990;73:751. Laxmaiah M. in: Karina G, Michael L, Vikram BP. ed. Essentials of Interventional Techniques in Managing Chronic Pain. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing: AG; 2018. s. 582-587.
  5. Gunduz OH, Sencan S, Kenis-Coskun O. Pain Relief due to Transsacrococcygeal Ganglion Impar Block in Chronic Coccygodynia: A Pilot Study. Pain Med. 2015;16:1278-1281.
  6. Fogel GR, Cunningham PY. Esses SI. Coccygodynia: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:49-54.
  7. Pennekamp PH, Kraft CN, Stütz A, et al. Coccygectomy for coccygodynia: does pathogenesis matter? J Trauma. 2005;59:1414-1419.
  8. Mitra R, Cheung L, Perry P. Efficacy of fluoroscopically guided steroid injections in the management of coccydynia. Pain Physician. 2007;10:775- 778. Buttaci JC, Foye PM, Stitik TP. Coccydynia successfully treated with ganglion impar blocks: A case series. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:218. Sencan S, Edipoglu IS, Ulku Demir FG, et al. Are steroids required in the treatment of ganglion impar blockade in chronic coccydynia? a prospective double-blinded clinical trial. Korean J Pain. 2019;32:301-306. Yektaş A. Bupivakain-Lidokain Karışımının Neden Olduğu Sistemik Lokal Anestezik Toksisitesinde İntravenöz Lipid ile Tedavi. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi. 2017;33:172-177.
  9. Loev MA, Varklet VL, Wilsey BL, et al. Cryoablation: a novel approach to neurolysis of the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1391-1393.
  10. Oh CS, Chung IH, Ji HJ, et al. Clinical implications of topographic anatomy on the ganglion impar. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:249-250.
  11. Datir A, Connell D. CT-guided injection for ganglion impar blockade: a radiological approach to