Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası / 2022 / Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Face-to-face Education and Video-mediated Distance Education on the Adaptation Process to the Videolaryngoscope

Yüz Yüze Eğitim ile Video Aracılı Uzaktan Eğitimin Videolaringoskopa Adaptasyon Sürecine Etkisi

Pages
253–258
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Video-mediated distance learning for videolaryngoscopy is a good alternative to face-to-face training.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Videolaryngoscopes are considered useful in difficult intubation and have been included in recent guidelines.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Fifth - 6th grade medical faculty students and residents with less than 1 year experience without videolaryngoscopy practice were divided into two groups as video-mediated distance education (Group 1) and face-to-face education (Group 2) groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Video-mediated distance learning for videolaryngoscopy is a good alternative to face-to-face training.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Videolaryngoscopes are considered useful in difficult intubation and have been included in recent guidelines. However, videolaryngoscopy training is inadequate and the learning curve is slow. Therefore, as an alternative to face-to-face education, it was aimed to evaluate the effect of video-mediated distance education on the adaptation process to the videolaryngoscope. Materials and Methods: Fifth - 6th grade medical faculty students and residents with less than 1 year experience without videolaryngoscopy practice were divided into two groups as video-mediated distance education (Group 1) and face-to-face education (Group 2) groups. Laryngoscope placement and larynx visualization times, Cormack Lehane (CML) score, tube placement and total intubation times, and intubation performances of the practitioners were evaluated on the mannequin with three applications repeated at intervals of one week. Results: Thirty-five practitioners were included, 18 (10 female, 8 male) in Group 1 and 17 (12 female, 5 male) in Group 2. While tube placement and total intubation time were significantly shortened in intragroup evaluations in both groups [32 (15.25-87) vs 16 (12.75-20.75), p=0.006; 3 (19.5-44.5) vs 14 (10-17.5), p=0.006]; there was no significant difference between the groups. While the CML score was 84% in Group 1 in the first application, this rate was 88% in Group 2. In the third application, the CML score was found to be 1 at a rate of 95% in Group 1 and 100% in Group 2 (p>0.05). Conclusion: Videolaryngoscopes can be used for airway, laryngoscopy, intubation training as well as difficult airway management. The problem caused by the low number of people who will provide videolaryngoscope usage training can be overcome with video trainings and more people can be easily accessed. Video-mediated distance learning for videolaryngoscopy is a good alternative to face-to-face training.

Özet

Amaç: Videolaringoskopların zor entübasyonda kullanışlı oldukları kabul edilmiş ve son kılavuzlarda yerini almıştır. Ancak videolaringoskopi eğitimi yetersiz ve öğrenme eğrisi de yavaştır. Bu nedenle yüz yüze eğitime alternatif olarak, video aracılı uzaktan eğitimin videolaringoskopa adaptasyon sürecine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Beşinci - 6. sınıf tıp fakültesi öğrencileri ile videolaringoskopi tecrübesi olmayan, 1 yıldan küçük araştırma görevlileri video aracılı uzaktan eğitim (Grup 1) ve yüz yüze eğitim (Grup 2) almak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. Birer hafta aralıklı tekrarlayan üç uygulama ile uygulayıcıların maket üzerinde, laringoskop yerleştirme ve larinks görüntüleme süreleri, Cormack Lehane (CML) skoru, tüp yerleştirme ve toplam entübasyon süreleri ile entübasyon performansları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grup 1’de 18 (10 kadın, 8 erkek), ve Grup 2’de 17 (12 kadın, 5 erkek) olmak üzere 35 uygulayıcı dahil edildi. Tüp yerleştirme ve toplam entübasyon süresi, her iki grupta, grup içi değerlendirmelerde anlamlı olarak kısalırken [32 (15,25-87) vs 16 (12,75-20,75), p=0,006; 32 (19,5-44,5) vs 14 (10-17,5), p=0,006]; gruplar arasında anlamlı fark saptanmadı. CML skoru birinci uygulamada Grup 1’de %84 oranında iken, bu oran Grup 2’de %88 idi. Üçüncü uygulamada ise Grup 1’de %95, Grup 2’de %100 oranında CML skoru 1 olarak saptandı (p>0,05). Sonuç: Videolaringoskoplar zor havayolu yönetiminin yanı sıra havayolu, laringoskopi, entübasyon eğitimleri için de kullanılabilir. Videolaringoskop kullanım eğitimi verecek kişi sayısının az olmasının yarattığı sorun video eğitimleri ile aşılıp, daha çok kişiye kolaylıkla erişilebilir. Videolaringoskopi için video aracılı uzaktan eğitim, yüz yüze eğitimlere iyi bir alternatiftir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Videolaringoskopi, Video Aracılı Eğitim, Uzaktan Eğitim

🔖

Cite This Article

Filizer, A. H., Bermede, O., Baytaş, V., Alanoğlu, Z. (2022). The Effect of Face-to-face Education and Video-mediated Distance Education on the Adaptation Process to the Videolaryngoscope. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, Cilt: 75 - Sayı: 2, 253–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/443355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Ward RJ, et al. Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:828-833
  2. Crosby ET, Cooper RM, Douglas MJ, et al. The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:757-776
  3. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251-270
  4. Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115: 827-848
  5. Cavus E, Bein B, Dörges V. [Airwaymanagement: video-assisted airway management]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011;46:588-596
  6. Andersen LH, Rovsing L, Olsen KS. GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:1090-1097
  7. Howard-Quijano KJ, Huang YM, Matevosian R, et al. Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:568-572
  8. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, et al. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:41-52
  9. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-191
  10. Ng I, Hill AL, Williams DL, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:439-443
  11. Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, et al. First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:382-385
  12. Van Zundert A, Maassen R, Lee R, et al. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:825-831
  13. Jain D, Dhankar M, Wig J, et al. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury-a manikin study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014;64:269-274
  14. Serocki G, Neumann T, Scharf E, et al. Indirect