Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 4

Entrepreneurship and its Determinants in Turkey: An Analysis in Marmara and Eastern Anatolia Region

Türkiye'de Girişimcilik ve Belirleyicileri: Marmara ve Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Pages
145–172
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accepting mat entrepreneurs use sources effectively, factors affecting the capacity use have been studied, among the entrepreneurs of Marmara, a developed region, and of Eastern Anatolia, a developing region, taking into account the difference of their views and values which they share on innovative ınvestments. it is observed that entrepreneurs of the Marmara Region utilize the economic sources more effectively than those of Eastern Anatolian Region and that they exhibit different trends as far as the use of resources is of concern. it is concluded that an important factor influencing the use of trend of sources is R&D actıvitıes and a larger market share in the Marmara Region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, factors affecting the nature of the entrepreneurship and difference in understanding of ınvesting between the entrepreneurs, as related to inequality of regional income level, have been investigated in the framework of SMEs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accepting mat entrepreneurs use sources effectively, factors affecting the capacity use have been studied, among the entrepreneurs of Marmara, a developed region, and of Eastern Anatolia, a developing region, taking into account the difference of their views and values which they share on innovative ınvestments. it is observed that entrepreneurs of the Marmara Region utilize the economic sources more effectively than those of Eastern Anatolian Region and that they exhibit different trends as far as the use of resources is of concern. it is concluded that an important factor influencing the use of trend of sources is R&D actıvitıes and a larger market share in the Marmara Region.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, in the Eastern Anatolian Rpgıon, an increase of capacity is secured by the labor-intensive production, consequently, relatively lower value-added production is achieved in the region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, factors affecting the nature of the entrepreneurship and difference in understanding of ınvesting between the entrepreneurs, as related to inequality of regional income level, have been investigated in the framework of SMEs. Accepting mat entrepreneurs use sources effectively, factors affecting the capacity use have been studied, among the entrepreneurs of Marmara, a developed region, and of Eastern Anatolia, a developing region, taking into account the difference of their views and values which they share on innovative ınvestments. it is observed that entrepreneurs of the Marmara Region utilize the economic sources more effectively than those of Eastern Anatolian Region and that they exhibit different trends as far as the use of resources is of concern. it is concluded that an important factor influencing the use of trend of sources is R&D actıvitıes and a larger market share in the Marmara Region. On the other hand, in the Eastern Anatolian Rpgıon, an increase of capacity is secured by the labor-intensive production, consequently, relatively lower value-added production is achieved in the region.

Özet

Çalışmada KOBİ kavramı çerçevesinde Türkiye'de mevcut girişimciliğin belirleyicileri ve buna bağlı olarak bölgesel dengesizlikte girişimci ayırımı ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre Marmara Bölgesi girişimcileri ile Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi girişimcilerinin kaynakları etkin kullanma açısından farklılıklar arz ettikleri gözlenmiş ve bu yönüyle kaynakları etkin kullanamayan bölgenin aynı zamanda ülke milli gelirinden de düşük pay aldığı gözlenmiştir. Diğer taraftan Marmara Bölgesi girişimlerinin kapasite kullanımında üst seviyede olmalarına yol açan faktörler arasında AR-GE yapmaları ve pazar payını çeşitlemiş olmaları önem arz etmektedir. -Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi girişimlerinin kapasite kullanım oranlarının yükselmesinde, istihdam edilen eleman sayısı ile pozitif ilişkinin varlığı, bölgede emek-yoğun üretim yönteminin kullanıldığına ve buna bağlı düşük katma değerli üretimin gerçekleştirildiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, H., ÖZKAN, Ş., GÜNDOĞDU, F., EMSEN, Ö. S. (2022). Entrepreneurship and its Determinants in Turkey: An Analysis in Marmara and Eastern Anatolia Region. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 4, 145–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/443323

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AKMUT, Özdemir (1990), Risk Sermayesi (Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, işletme Ekonomisi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Yayını). AMABILE, Teresa M. (1998), "How To Kili Creativity," Harvard Business Review (September-October): 77-87. BYGRAVE VVilliam D./ TIMMONS Jeffry A. (1992), Venture Capital at the Crossroads (Boston: Harvard Business School Press). COULTER, Mary (2001),
  2. Entrepreneurship in Action, Small Business 2000 (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall). DİE (2003),
  3. Konular, Nüfus-Demoğrafi, http://www.die.gov.tr/konularr7nufusSayimi. htm (23.01.2003).
  4. DUTZ, Mark A./ORDOVER Janusz A./V/ILLIG Robert D. (2000), "Competition Policy and Development, Entrepreneurship, Access Policy and Economic Development: Lesson f rom Industrial Organization," European Economic Review, Vol. 44: 739-747.
  5. EMSEN, Ö. Selçuk (2001), "Türkiye'de Bölgesel Dengesizlik Sorunu," Türkiye Sorunlarına Çözüm Konferansı-IV: Cumhuriyetin Yüzüncü Yılında Temel Hedefler ve Çözüm Önerileri, 21-25 Mayıs 2001 (Erzurum): 1-13. http://www.girisirn.net/iskurma.htm, (20.09. 2002).
  6. KÖKSAL, Bilge Aloba (1994), istatistik Analiz Metotları (İstanbul: Çağlayan Kitapevi). KRUGMAN, Paul (2001), Bunalım Ekonomisinin Geri Dönüşü (İstanbul: Literatür Yayınlaırı, 2. Basım) (Çev.: Neşenur Domaniç). LITTUNEN, Hannu (2000), "Entrepreneurship and the Characteristics of the Entrepreneurial Personality," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 6, No. 6: 295-299.
  7. MUELLER, Stephen, L./THOMAS Anisya S. (2000), "Culture and Entrepreneurial Potential: A Nine Country Study of Lous of Control and Innovativeness," Journal of Business Venturing 16: 52-62.
  8. ÖZDAMAR, Kazım (1999), Paket Programlar iie istatistiksel Veri Analizi 1, (Eskişehir: Kaan Kitapevi). SARIASLAN, Halil (1992), "Venture Capital (Risk Sermayesi) Finansman Modeli ve Türkiye'de Uygulama Olanakları," ASO Dergisi Özel Eki (Ocak-Şubat). TCMB (2003),
  9. Genel istatistikler, GSYlH, Bölgeler ve iller itibariyle, http://tcmbf40.tcmb.gov.tr/cgi-bin/famecgi?cgi=$cbtweb, (23.01.2003).
  10. WICKHAM, Philip A. (2001), Strategic Entrepreneurship; A Dedsion-Making Approach to New Venture Creation and Management (Financial Times Prentice Hail). ZAHRA Shaker A./NEUBAUM Donald O./HUSE Morten (2000), "Entrepreneurship in Medium-Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ovvnership and Governance Systems," Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 5: 947-960.
  11. ZIMMERER, Thomas VV./SCARBOROUGH Norman M. (1998), Essentials of Entrepreneuprship and Smal