Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3

Organizational Change of Nato, 1949-1999: From a North-Atlantic Alliance to a Euro-Atlantic Security Organization

Nato'nun Örgütsel Değişimi, 1949-1999 Kuzey-Atlantik ittifakından Avrupa-Atlantik Güvenlik Örgütüne

Pages
69–108
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides, the European allies, that is those states that are members of both NATO and the European Union, seems to have created an organization within the organization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:NATO experienced critical organizational changes in its first fifty years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The developments in the international security environment such as the Korean War, the Cuban missile crisis, and the collapse of the Soviet Union pushed NATO to make organizational changes in order to adapt to new security environments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, the European allies, that is those states that are members of both NATO and the European Union, seems to have created an organization within the organization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

NATO experienced critical organizational changes in its first fifty years. The developments in the international security environment such as the Korean War, the Cuban missile crisis, and the collapse of the Soviet Union pushed NATO to make organizational changes in order to adapt to new security environments. The US-European relations and the national security and defense policies of the European allies, however, had an effect on the nature of the purposes and means adopted by the organization. Given the organizational transformations, one can conclude that today's NATO is radically different from the original alliance. Rather than an alliance founded to deter any aggression in the North Atlantic area, NATO is now an organization that aims to preserve peace and to reinforce security and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area. Besides, the European allies, that is those states that are members of both NATO and the European Union, seems to have created an organization within the organization.

Özet

1949 ile 1999 arasındaki gelişmeler göstermektedir ki NATO ilk 50 yıllık tarihinde önemli örgütsel değişiklikler geçirmiştir. Kore Savaşı, Küba füze krizi ve Sovyetler Birligi'nin dağılması gibi uluslararası güvenlik ortamındaki gelişmeler, ortaya çıkan yeni güvenlik ortamlarına uyum sağlamak için NATO'yu değişiklik yapmaya itmiştir. NATO'nun yeni örgütsel amaç ve araç tanımlamasımn son şekline bakıldığında ise, sadece uluslararası güvenlikteki gelişmeler değil, ABD-Avrupalı müttefikler arasındaki ilişkiler ile Avrupalı devletlerin kendi politik stratejileri ve bu devletlerin birbirleri arasındaki dengelerin de örgütsel değişim üzerinde etkisi olduğu görülmektedir. 50 yıllık tarihi incelendiğinde, bugünkü NATO'nun ilk kuruluş yıllanındaki NATO'dan oldukça farklı bir örgüt olduğu ortaya çıkmaktadır. Artık NATO bir "Kuzey Atlantik" ittifakı degiı, "Avrupa-Atlantik" bölgesinde güvenlik ve istikrannı sağlamaya çalışan ve bir tarafta ABD'nin diğer tarafta da Avrupa Birligi üyelerinin liderliğini yaptığı iki başlı bir örgüttür.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, N. (2022). Organizational Change of Nato, 1949-1999: From a North-Atlantic Alliance to a Euro-Atlantic Security Organization. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 60 - Sayı: 3, 69–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/443276

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. ARMAOGLU, Fahir (1989), 20. Yüzyıl Siyasi Tarihi, 1914-1980 (Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları). ASH, Timothy G. (1993), In Europe's Name: Germany and the Divided Continent (New York: Random House). BANDOW, Doug (1999), "NATO's Balkan Disaster: Wilsonian Warmongering Gone mad," Mediterranean Quarterly, 10/3: 70-88.
  2. BAUMANN, Carol E. (1987), "Europe in NATO: Some Historical Perspectives," BAUMANN, Carol E. (ed.), Europe in NATO: Deterrence, Defense, and Arms Control (New York: Praeger): 1-31.
  3. BISSETT, James (2001), "NATO's Balkan Blunder," Mediterranean Quarterly, 12/1: 39-50.
  4. BORAWSKI, John (1995), "Partnership for Peace and Beyond," International Affairs, 71/2: 233-246.
  5. BOUTWELL, Jeffrey (1990), The German Nuclear Dilemma (Ithaca: CorneLL University Press). BRZEZINSKI, Zbigniew (1995), "A Plan for Europe," Foreign Affairs, 74/1: 26-42.
  6. CHAYES, Antonia Handler/WEITZ, Richard (1996), "The Military Perspective on Conflict Prevention: NATO," CHAYES, Abram/CHAYES, Antonia Handler (eds.), Preventing Conflict in the Post.Communist World: Mobilizing International and Regional Organizations (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution): 381-427.
  7. CORTERIER, Peter (1991), "Transforming the Atlantic ALLiance," The Washington Quarterly, 14/1: 27-37.
  8. COWEN, Gina (1983), "Reflections on Consensus in NATO: Past Experience and Present Problems," Arms Control, 4/2: 134-145.
  9. CROMWELL, William C. (1992), The United States and the European Pillar: The Strained Alliance (New York: St. Martin's Press). DAALDER, Ivo H. (1991), The Nature and the Practice of Flexible Response: NATO Strategy and Theater Nuclear Forces since 1967 (New York: Columbia University Press). DANILOV, Dimitri A. (1999), "Implications of the NATO Attack Against Yugoslavia for European Security and Russian-Western Relations," Mediterranean Quarterly, 10/3: 51-69.
  10. DEAN, Jonathan (1992), "Components of a Post-Cold war Security System for Europe," BRAUCH, Gunter/KENNEDY Robert (eds.), Alternative Conventional Defense Postures in the European Theater, Volume 2: The Impact of Political Change on Strategy, Technology, and Arms Control (New York: Crane Russak): 45-68.
  11. DINAN, Desmond (1994), Ever Closer Union?: An Introductian to the European Community (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers). DUKE, Simon (1993), The Burdensharing Debate: A Reassessment (New York: St.Martin's Press). EVANGELlSTA, Matthew (1995), "The Paradox of State Strength: Transnational Relations, Domestic Structures, and Security Policy in