Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 4

Behavioral Dimension of Performance Feedback Phenomenon and it’s Process

Davranış Boyutuyla Performans Geribildirim Olgusu ve Süreci

Pages
141–178
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a conclusion, feedback is a main and common characteristic in all processess and jobs and should be widely used in organizations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We make a common mistake in assessing the feedback phenomenon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:If we look at the implementations, we can easily recognize that performance feedback is only linked to "perfomance interview" phase and some written documents sent to receipents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a conclusion, feedback is a main and common characteristic in all processess and jobs and should be widely used in organizations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We make a common mistake in assessing the feedback phenomenon. If we look at the implementations, we can easily recognize that performance feedback is only linked to "perfomance interview" phase and some written documents sent to receipents. But, further of this approach, feedback concept consist a wide perspective. Feedback network has it's own system we always face in every step of work and social environment and perhaps is a serious knowledge resource we frequently prefer. In the feedback process, individual is not passive, but also positioned active in order to acquire feedback knowledge and use it for self-regulation for maximizing technical and behavioral performance. So, organizations have to understand all psychological and sociological aspects of feedback seeking behavior in order to manage it. As a conclusion, feedback is a main and common characteristic in all processess and jobs and should be widely used in organizations.

Özet

Örgütlerde geribildirim olgusu değerlendirilirken, çoğunlukla belirli aralıklarla uygulanan performans değerlendirme sisteminin "açık görüşme" evresi veya kapalı zarflar içerisinde iletilen yazılı dokümanlar dikkate alınmaktadır. Salt bu aşamalara endeksli bir geribildirim akışı ve örgütsel yapılanma doğru açılımlar yaratmayacaktır. Performans geribildirim döngüsünün, günlük iş ve sosyal yaşamın tüm evrelerinde yüzyüze olunan ve belki de farkında olunmadan sıkça başvurulan önemli bir bilgi kaynağı olduğu unutulmamalıdır. Bu anlamda performans geribildirim olgusunun, net biçimde anlaşılması gereken ve psikolojik, sosyolojik yansımaları bulunan bir süreç dahilinde işlediği, bu süreç içerisinde kişinin pasif değil aktif şekilde konumlandığı ve geribildirim olgusunun "davranışsallaştırıldığı" görülmektedir. Yani çalışan, geribildirim bilgisi edinmek için harekete geçmekte, elde ettiği verileri kullanarak teknik ve davranışsal performansını arttırma çabası içerisine girmektedir. Bu bağlamda, örgütteki tüm işlerin ve süreçlerin en temel, ortak öğelerinden biri olmanın da ötesinde, geribildirimi, kullanımının yaygınlaştırılması gereken ciddi bir kavram olarak algılamak önem taşımaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYMAZ, K. (2022). Behavioral Dimension of Performance Feedback Phenomenon and it’s Process. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 4, 141–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/443157

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ASHFORD, Susan J. (1986), "Feedback-Seeking In Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective," Academy of Management Journal (Vol: 29, No: 3): 465-487.
  2. ASHFORD, Susan J./BLATT, Ruth/VANDEWALLE, Don (2003), "Reflections On The Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback Seeking Behavior in Organizations," Journal of Management (Vol: 29, No: 6): 773-799.
  3. ASHFORD, Susan/TSUI, Anne S. (1991), "Self Regulation for Managerial Effectiveness: The Role of Active Feedback Seeking," The Academy of Management Journal (Vol: 34, No: 2): 251-280.
  4. BACANLI, Hasan ( ) Gelişim ve Öğrenme (Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 4.baskı) BAILEY, James R., Chen, Chao C, Dou, Sheng-Gong, "Conceptions of Self and Performance Related Feedback in the U.S., Japan and China," Journal of International Business Studies, 1997, Vol: 28, No:3: 608-620;
  5. BAKER, Diane F./BUCKLEY, M. Ronald (1996), "A Historical Perspective of the Impact of Feedback On Behavior," Journal of Management History (Vol: 2, No: 4): 21-33.
  6. BEE, Roland/BEE, Frances (1997), Yapıcı Geribildirim (Ankara: Gökçe Ofset ve Matbaacılık, 1.Baskı) (Çev.: A. Bora; O. Cankoçak) BERNARD, Aletta M. (2002), Feedback Seeking In Customer Service Relationships (Louisiana: Louisiana State University Pub) BERNICHON, Tiffiny/COOK, Kathleen E./BROWN, Jonathon D. (2003), "Seeking Self-Evaluative Feedback: The Interactive Role of Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Views," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol: 84, No: 1): 194-204.
  7. BRIEF, Arthur P./HOLLENBECK, John R. (1985), "An Expiatory Study of Self-Regulating Activities and Their Effects on Job Performance," Journal of Occupational Behavior (Vol: 6, No: 3): 197-208.
  8. BRUTUS, Stephane/LONDON, Manuel/ MARTINEAU, Jennifer (1999), "The Impact of 360-Degree Feedback on Planning for Carreer Development," Journal of Management Development (Vol: 18, No: 8): 676-693.
  9. BUDAK, Selçuk (2000), Psikoloji Sözlüğü (Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları) CHAAAPOUX, Joseph E. (1991),, "Designing Feedback Mechanisims Into Systems To Enhance User Performance," Journal of Systems Management (Vol: 42, No: 8): 28-30.
  10. CHUNG, Beth G. (1997), "Collecting and Using Employee Feedback," Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly: 51-57.
  11. EARLY, P. / GİBSON, Christopher / CRISTINA, B. / CHEN, Chao C. (2001), "How Did I Do? Versus How Did We Do?: Cultural Contrasts of Performance Feedback and Self-Efficacy," Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol: 30, No: 5: 595-603.
  12. FEDOR, Donald B./RENSVOLD, Roger B./ADAMS,