Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 4

A Research on the Determinants of the Organizational Innovation of Turkish Firms

Türk Firmalarının Organizasyonel İnovasyon Yeteğini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
1–20
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings implicated that the knowledge, cooperation, networking, and the market are the most important factors to affect the organizational innovation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Innovation has an important role for the firms to sustain competitive advantage and survive in the market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But as being very limited studies in international innovation literature on organizational innovation and being no research in national literature, it very hard to improve national innovation strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings implicated that the knowledge, cooperation, networking, and the market are the most important factors to affect the organizational innovation
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Innovation has an important role for the firms to sustain competitive advantage and survive in the market. One of the important subjects in the innovation types is organizational innovation. But as being very limited studies in international innovation literature on organizational innovation and being no research in national literature, it very hard to improve national innovation strategies. In this study in order to fill this gap, it is tried to find out the Turkish firms’ organizational innovation determinant by using the 2008 Innovation Questionnaire data collected by National Statistics Board. The findings implicated that the knowledge, cooperation, networking, and the market are the most important factors to affect the organizational innovation

Özet

İnovasyon, firmaların rekabet avantajı sağlayabilmesi ve pazar içerisinde hayatta kalabilmesi açısından önemli bir yer tutmaktadır. İnovasyon çeşitleri arasında sayılan önemli bir konu da organizasyonel inovasyondur. Ancak uluslararası literatürde firmaların organizasyonel inovasyonlarının belirleyicilerini tespit etmek üzere yapılmış çok sınırlı araştırma olması ve ulusal literatürde ise böyle bir çalışma olmaması, ülkesel bazda inovasyon stratejisi geliştirilebilmesini kısıtlamaktadır. Bu eksikliği gidermek üzere tasarlanan bu araştırmada, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu’nun 2008 yılı Yenilik Anketi verileri kullanılarak, Türk firmalarının organizasyonel inovasyonlarını etkileyen faktörler tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları organizasyonel inovasyonun oluşumunda bilgi, iş birliği, ağ geliştirme potansiyeli ve pazar büyüklüğünün en önemli faktörler olduğunu göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BURMAOĞLU, S., ŞEŞEN, H. (2022). A Research on the Determinants of the Organizational Innovation of Turkish Firms. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 66 - Sayı: 4, 1–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/443028

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acs, Z. J., ve Audretsch, B. D. (1990), Innovation and Small Firms (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Anderson, N., ve King, N. (1993), “Innovation in organizations”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8: 1-34.
  2. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., ve Lay, G. (2008), “Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys”, Technovation, 28: 644- 657. Azzone, G., ve Noci, G. (1998), "Identifying effective PMSs for the deployment of “green” manufacturing strategies", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(4): 308-335.
  3. Barney, J. B. (1986), “Organizational Culture: Can It be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?” Academy of Management Review, 11, July: 656-665.
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
  5. Birchall, D.W., Chanaron, J.J., ve Soderquist, K. (1996), “Managing innovation in SMEs: A comparison of companies in the UK, France and Portugal”, International Journal of Technology Management 12(3): 291–305.
  6. Caroli, E., ve Van Reenen, J. (2001), “Skill biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishment”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1149-1192.
  7. Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (Boston, Harvard Business School Press). Daft, R. L. (1978), “A dual-core model of organizational innovation”, Academy of Management Journal, 21: 193-210.
  8. Damanpour F. (1992), “Organizational Size and Innovation”, Organization Studies, 13: 375-402.
  9. Damanpour, F. (1987), “The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors”, Journal of Management, 13: 675-688.
  10. Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, 34(3): 555-590.
  11. Damanpour, F., Szabat, K.A., ve Evan, W.M. (1989), “The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance”, Journal of Management Studies, 26(6): 587-601.
  12. Damanpour, F., ve Evan, W. M. (1984), “Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 392-409.
  13. Demirguc-Kunt, A., ve V. Maksimovic (1998), "Law, Finance and Firm Growth", The Journal of Finance 53(6): 2107-2137. Dougherty D., ve Bowman E.H. (1996), “The Effects of Organizational Downsizing