Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 1

Moving Post-Keynesian Theory Forward: Current Debates and Alternative Proposals

POST-KEYNESYEN TEORİYİ İLERİ TAŞIMAK: GÜNCEL TARTIŞMALAR VE ALTERNATİF ÖNERİLER

Pages
35–55
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study, which asserts post-Keynesian theory is a crucial economic approach in the search for constructive alternatives by examining the causality relationship of 2008 crisis in a comprehensive framework, discusses necessity of extending context of the theory on the basis of contemporary debates and therefore explores possible alternatives for the theory to move forward in line with current issues.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study argues that post-Keynesian theory has come into prominence in economic approaches by claming that mainstream economics has become questionable with “Great Recession” and deals with the historical evolution of the post-Keynesian approach on the basis of fundamental proposals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study argues that post-Keynesian theory has come into prominence in economic approaches by claming that mainstream economics has become questionable with “Great Recession” and deals with the historical evolution of the post-Keynesian approach on the basis of fundamental proposals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study, which asserts post-Keynesian theory is a crucial economic approach in the search for constructive alternatives by examining the causality relationship of 2008 crisis in a comprehensive framework, discusses necessity of extending context of the theory on the basis of contemporary debates and therefore explores possible alternatives for the theory to move forward in line with current issues.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study argues that post-Keynesian theory has come into prominence in economic approaches by claming that mainstream economics has become questionable with “Great Recession” and deals with the historical evolution of the post-Keynesian approach on the basis of fundamental proposals. This study, which asserts post-Keynesian theory is a crucial economic approach in the search for constructive alternatives by examining the causality relationship of 2008 crisis in a comprehensive framework, discusses necessity of extending context of the theory on the basis of contemporary debates and therefore explores possible alternatives for the theory to move forward in line with current issues.

Özet

Bu çalışma “Büyük Durgunluk” ile birlikte anaakım iktisat anlayışının giderek daha fazla sorgulanırhale geldiği saptamasında bulunarak post-Keynesyen teorinin iktisadi düşüncede önem kazandığını iddiaetmekte ve bu doğrultuda ilk olarak post-Keynesyen yaklaşımın temel önermeleri bağlamında teorinin tarihselevrimini konu edinmektedir. Post-Keynesyen teorinin 2008 krizinin nedensellik ilişkilerini daha kapsamlı vebütünlüklü bir çerçevede ele alarak kriz sonrasında ortaya çıkan yapıcı alternatif arayışlarında önemli biruğrak olduğunu iddia eden bu çalışma, teorinin güncel tartışmalar düzleminde kapsamının genişletilmesigerekliliğini tartışmakta ve yakın zamanda ortaya çıkan gelişmeler bağlamında post-Keynesyen teorinin ileritaşınmasına ilişkin alternatif önerilerin neler olabileceğine dair argümanlar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

CÖMERT, M. (2022). Moving Post-Keynesian Theory Forward: Current Debates and Alternative Proposals. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 74 - Sayı: 1, 35–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/442900

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akçay, Ümit ve A. Rıza Güngen (2014),
  2. Finansallaşma, Borç Krizi ve Çöküş (Ankara: Notabene Yayınları). Appadurai, Arjun (2017), “Demokrasi Yorgunluğu”, Geiselberger, Heinrich (Der.), Büyük Gerileme: Zamanımızın Ruh Hali Üstüne Uluslararası Bir Tartışma (İstanbul: Metis Yayınları): 17- 30. Arestis, Philip ve Malcolm Sawyer (1993), Political Economy: An Editorial Manifesto, International Papers in Political Economy, 1 (1). Arrighi, Giovanni (2010),
  3. Long Twentieth Century Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times (London: Verso). Bauman, Zygmunt (2017), “Nesnesini ve İsmini Arayan Semptomlar”, Geiselberger, Heinrich (Der.), Büyük Gerileme:Zamanımızın Ruh Hali Üstüne Uluslararası Bir Tartışma (İstanbul: Metis Yayınları): 30-44.
  4. Beitel, Karl (2012), “Kriz, Bütçe Açığı ve Doların Gücü: Kamu Sektörünün İtibarsızlaştırılmasına Direnmek”, Panitch L., Albo G., Chibber V. (Der.), Bu Defaki Kriz (İstanbul: Yordam Kitap): 286-310.
  5. Berman, Marshall (2014), Marksizmle Maceram (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları) (Çev. Aylin Ülçer). Blecker, Robert A. (2016), “The US Economy Since The Crisis: Slow Recovery And Secular Stagnation”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Eylül, 203-214.
  6. Chester, Lynne ve Joy Paton (2013), “The economic–environment relation: can post-Keynesians, Régulationists and Polanyians offer insights?”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 10 (1), 106–121.
  7. Chomsky, Noam (2012), “Merkez Tutunamıyor: Radikal Düşünceyi Harlamak”, Panitch L., Albo G., Chibber V. (Der.), Bu Defaki Kriz (İstanbul: Yordam Kitap): 336-351. Cynamon Barry Z. ve Steven M. Fazzari (2016), “Inequality, the Great Recession and Slow Recovery”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 373–399.
  8. Cynamon Barry Z., Fazzari, Steven M. ve Mark Setterfield (2013), “Understanding the Great Recession”, After the Great Recession (New York: Cambridge University Press): 3-31.
  9. Dumenil, Gerard ve Dumenil Levy (2015), Büyük Yol Ayrımı: Neoliberalizme Son Noktayı Koymak (İstanbul, İletişim) (Çev. Ayşen Gür). Eichner, Alfred S. ve Kregel, Jan A. Kregel (1975), “An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics”, Journal of Economic Literature, 13 (4), 1293-1314.
  10. Fontana, Giuseppe ve Malcolm Sawyer (2016), “Towards Post-Keynesian Ecological Macroeconomics”, Ecological Economics, 121, 186-195.
  11. Fraser, Nancy (2017), “İlerici Neoliberalizme Karşı Gerici Popülizm: Bir Hobson Seçimi”, Geiselberger, H