Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 2

CIVES, SANNITI, CONSUETUDO

Pages
915–936
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A further aspect of research interest is the identification of ‘emporium’ alongside the settlement structures of the vicus; the so-called ‘emporium’ are to be identified in these asyla in which the negotiations took place between Romans and peregrini who were not allowed to contract through the ius civile institutes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The essay analyzes the presence of the so-called ‘paganico-vicana’ structure in pre-Roman Italy and up to the fourth century B.
📊
Key Findings & Data:C., coming to the consideration that this interpretation, for which the pagus should have included both isolated houses, and one or more vici inside and would have had its aggregation point in a sanctuary, which could be located in an isolated rural site or even within the vicus, must be considered outdated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A further aspect of research interest is the identification of ‘emporium’ alongside the settlement structures of the vicus; the so-called ‘emporium’ are to be identified in these asyla in which the negotiations took place between Romans and peregrini who were not allowed to contract through the ius civile institutes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The essay analyzes the presence of the so-called ‘paganico-vicana’ structure in pre-Roman Italy and up to the fourth century B. C., coming to the consideration that this interpretation, for which the pagus should have included both isolated houses, and one or more vici inside and would have had its aggregation point in a sanctuary, which could be located in an isolated rural site or even within the vicus, must be considered outdated. However, in my opinion, the presence of the pagus or in any case of stronger settlement structures is not entirely excluded; in fact, it could be found in the archaeological evidence related to the 'barrier fortresses' established within the framework of military defensive structures. A further aspect of research interest is the identification of ‘emporium’ alongside the settlement structures of the vicus; the so-called ‘emporium’ are to be identified in these asyla in which the negotiations took place between Romans and peregrini who were not allowed to contract through the ius civile institutes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZARRO, G. (2022). CIVES, SANNITI, CONSUETUDO. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 69 - Sayı: 2, 915–936. https://ajindex.com/articles/442813

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. A. BURDESE, Ancora sul contratto nel pensiero di Labeone (a proposito di uno scritto di R. Santoro), in SDHI. 51, 1983.
  2. A. CALORE, Forme giuridiche del ‘bellum iustum’, Milano 2003.
  3. A. GUARINO, Il contratto secondo Labeone, in Labeo 29, 1983.
  4. A. GUARINO, L’ordinamento giuridico romano5, Napoli 1990. A. HÄGERSTRÖM, Der römische Obligationsbegriff im Lichte der allgemeiner römischen Rechtsanschauung I, Uppsala-Leipzig 1927.
  5. A. ROSENBERG, Der staat der alten Italiker. Untersuchungen über die ursprüngliche verfassung der Latiner, Osker und Etrusker, Berlin 1913. A. SCHIAVONE, ‘Ius’.L’invenzione del diritto in Occidente, Torino 2017.
  6. A. SCHULTEN, Die Landgemeinden im römischen Reich, in Phiolologus 35 (1894). A. WALDE - J. B. HOFMANN, Lateiniscbes etymologisches Wörterbuch, I, dritte Auflage, Heidelberg 1938. B. ALBANESE, ‘Agere’, ‘gerere’, ‘contrahere’ in D. 50.16.19. Congetture su una definizione di Labeone, in SDHI. 38, 1972.
  7. C. A. CANNATA, Labeone, Aristone e il sinallagma, in Iura, 58, 2010.
  8. C. GIOFFREDI, Religione e diritto nella più antica esperienza romana (per la definizione del concetto di ius), in SDHI. 20, 1954.
  9. C. GIOFFREDI, Diritto e processo nelle antiche forme giuridiche romane, Roma 1955.
  10. C. LETTA, Nuove prospettive per lo studio di vici e pagi nell’Italia centrale appenninica, in E. CECCARONI - A. FAUSTOFERRI (eds.), Valerio Cianfarani e le culture medioadriatiche, Atti del Convegno, Chieti-Teramo, 27-29 giugno 2008, Quaderni di Archeologia d’Abruzzo 2, 2010 [2012].
  11. E. SCIANDRELLO, Studi sul contratto estimatorio e sulla permuta nel diritto romano, Trento 2011. E. SCIANDRELLO, ‘Actio de aestimato’ e tipicità dei mezzi processuali. Riflessioni su Ulp. 32 ‘ad ed.’ D. 19.3.1 pr., in L. GAROFALO (a cura di), ‘Actio in rem’ e ‘actio in personam’. In ricordo di Mario Talamanca, II, Padova, 2011.
  12. E. T. SALMON, Samnium and the Samnites, Cambridge 1967.
  13. E. TODISCO, I ‘vici’ rurali nel paesaggio dell’Italia romana, Bari 2011.
  14. E. TODISCO, La percezione delle realtà rurali nell’Italia romana: i vici e i pagi, in M. PANI (ed.), Epigrafia e territorio, Bari 2004.
  15. G. FRANCIOSI, Osservazioni sulle strutture sociali dei Sanniti, in Opuscoli. Scritti di Gennaro Franciosi, Napoli 2012.
  16. G. TAGLIAMONTE, I Sanniti. Caudini, Irpini, Pentri,Carricini, Frentani, Milano 1996.
  17. G. ZARRO, Aspetti dell’autonomia dei privati. Dalla fides ai nova negotia, Napoli 2015.
  18. G. ZECCHINI, Il federalismo nel mondo antico, Milano 2005.
  19. H. FUGIER, Recherches sur l’expression du sacré