SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Process of Students with Learning Disability: Implementation of Think Aloud Protocol

Ufuk ÖZKUBAT
E Rüya ÖZMEN
Pages
155–180
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion section, suggestions are made for addressing the needs of research focused on cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by students with learning disabilities and their peers

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to identify the think aloud protocols utilized in the assessment of cognitive and metacognitive strategies that are used in the process of mathematical problem solving by the students with learning disabilities (LD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Regarding the purpose of the study, the strategies required in mathematical problem solving are firstly clarified, and students’ mathematical problem solving difficulties are stated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion section, suggestions are made for addressing the needs of research focused on cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by students with learning disabilities and their peers
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the think aloud protocols utilized in the assessment of cognitive and metacognitive strategies that are used in the process of mathematical problem solving by the students with learning disabilities (LD). Regarding the purpose of the study, the strategies required in mathematical problem solving are firstly clarified, and students’ mathematical problem solving difficulties are stated. Secondly, the use of think aloud protocols for the assessment ofcognitive and metacognitive strategies in mathematical problem solving are identified, and the related research findings are discussed. Thirdly, the information about the educational implications of assessment results concerning the application of think aloud protocol is provided. In conclusion section, suggestions are made for addressing the needs of research focused on cognitive and metacognitive strategies used by students with learning disabilities and their peers

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKUBAT, U., ÖZMEN, E. R. (2022). Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Process of Students with Learning Disability: Implementation of Think Aloud Protocol. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 155–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/442728

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akdur, T. E. (1996). Yardımlaşarak bilgisayar ortamında kavram haritalarının hazırlanmasının, lise seviyesindeki öğrencilerin fizik başarısı, fizik dersine ve kavram haritalamaya yönelik tutumları ve biliş bilgisi becerileri üzerindeki etkisi [Effect of collaborative computer based concepy mapping on students physics achievement, attitude toward physics, attitude toward concept mapping and metacognitive skills at high school level] (Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Science, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi. (Thesis Number 56781) Baker, L., & Cerro, L. C. (2002). Assessing metacognition in children and adults. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 99-145).
  2. Lincoln, Nebraska: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Billingsley, F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and example. Behavioral Assessment, 2(3), 229-241.
  3. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Barclay, C. R. (1979). Training and self-checking routines for estimating test readiness: Generalization from list learning to prose recall. Child Development, 50(2), 501-512.
  4. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Hammill, D. D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with LD who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(2), 168-177.
  5. Bryant, D. P., Smith, D. D., & Bryant, B. R. (2008). Teaching students with special needs in inclusive classrooms. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Chan, L. K. S. (1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(4), 184-193.
  6. Çakıroğlu, A. (2007). Üstbiliş [Metacognition]. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(2), 6-21.
  7. Çiçekçioğlu, D. (2003). Bilişsel ve biliş ötesi okuma stratejilerinin direk ve tümleşik olarak bilinçlendirme seviyesinde öğretiminin okuma yeterliliğine ve strateji kullanımına etkileri [The effects of direct and integrated instruction of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies at awareness-raising level on reading proficiency and strategy use] (Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from http://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi. (Thesis Number 140299) Demir-Gülşen, M. (2000). Olasılık ve matematik başarısını bilişsel, bilişüstü ve duyuşsal değişkenlerle açıklayıcı bir model çalışması [A model to investigate probability