SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Evli kadınların aile sistemlerini algılayışları

Married women’s perception of family systems

Serap NAZLI
Pages
417–437
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In general, it is determined that married women internalize traditional Turkish family structure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine how married women perceive their family systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research data was obtained from 21 married women by interview technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In general, it is determined that married women internalize traditional Turkish family structure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how married women perceive their family systems. Research data was obtained from 21 married women by interview technique. Qualitative content analysis of the obtained data has been conducted in 4 themes (duties, co-operation and supporting; intra-familial interaction; balance, rules and roles; family root and upper system). In general, it is determined that married women internalize traditional Turkish family structure.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı evli kadınların aile sistemlerini nasıl algıladıklarını incelemektir. Araştırma verileri 21 evli kadından görüşme yöntemi ile elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen nitel verilerin betimsel içerik analizi 4 temada (görevler, işbirliği ve destekleme; aile içi etkileşim; denge, kurallar ve roller; kök aile ve üst sistem) yapılmıştır. Genel olarak evli kadınların geleneksel Türk aile yapısının değerlerini benimsedikleri belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NAZLI, S. (2022). Evli kadınların aile sistemlerini algılayışları. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 417–437. https://ajindex.com/articles/442618

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Agate, J.R., Zabriskie, R.B., Agate, S.T. ve Poff, R. (2009). Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. Jornal of Leisure Research, 41,2,205-223.
  2. Başbağ, A. (1995). Metropolitan aile ilişkilerinde değişen cinsel roller. Aile Kurultayı. Ankara: Aile Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları.
  3. Brennan, J. L. ve Wambolt, F.S. (1990). From the outside ın examining how ındividuals define their experinced family, Communication Research. August, vol.17 Cumsille, P., Darling, N., Flaherty, B. ve Martinez, M.L. (2009). Heterogeneity and change in the patterning of adolescents’ perceptions of the legitimacy of parental authority: A latent transition model. Child Development, March/April, 2,418-432.
  4. Ewalt, P.L. (1997). The revitalization of improverished communities, Social Work. Sep vol.42, 5. Farber, N.K. (2006). Conducting qualitative research: A practical guide for school counselors. Professional School Counseling, www.findarticles.com Fenell, D. ve Weinhold, B. (1989). Counseling Families. Colorado: Love Pub. Com. Fincham, F.D. ve Beach, S.R. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationship, 9,239-251.
  5. Fitzpatrik, M.A. ve Wombolt, F.S. (1990). Where is all said done? Toward an integration of intrapersonal and interpersonal models of marital and family communication, Communication Research. August, vol.20. Frude, N. (1991). Understanding Family Problems. Chishester: John Wiley and Sons. Gladding, S.T. (1998).
  6. Family Therapy. History, Theory and Practice. Second Edition,
  7. Merrill Prentice Hall. Glaser, S. ve Glaser, R. (1995).
  8. Pathway to understanding, Nation’s Business. Nov, vol.83. Goldenberg, I. ve Goldenberg, H. (1996).
  9. Family Therapy. Fourth Edition, Brooks/cole Pub. Com. Gordon, K.C. ve Baucom, D.H. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: Preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. The American Jornal of Family Therapy, 31, 179-199.
  10. Gülerce, A. (2007). Dönüşümsel aile modeli ve Türkiye’de Ailelerin Psikolojik Örüntüleri. İstanbul:
  11. Boğaziçi Yayınları.
  12. Hill, C.E., Thompson, B.J., ve Williams, E.N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517-572.
  13. İmamoğlu, O. (1991a). Değişen Dünya’da aile içi roller. Değişen Dünyada Birey Aile Toplum Semineri. İstanbul.
  14. İmamoğlu, O. (1991b). Aile içinde kadın erkek rolleri. Türk Aile Ansiklopedisi 3. Ankara: Aile Araştırma Kurumu Yayınları.
  15. İmamoğlu, O. (1