Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Laboratuvar Uygulamalarında Sorgulayıcı Araştırma ve 5E Modeli: Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarıİçin Geliştirilen Mesleki Gelişim Program

Inquiry-Based Learning and 5E Model in Laboratory Practices: A Professional Development Program For Prospective Classroom Teachers

Pages
161–197
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The quantitative research findings indicated that the prospective teachers were successful in developing inquiry-based laboratory activities and that the program that was developed for that purpose was highly effective.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of the professional development program, which was developed to teach prospective teachers inquiry- and 5E model-based laboratory activities, on prospective classroom teachers' ability to develop laboratory activities and on their beliefs about inquiry-based approach and laboratory activities based on this approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted in two hours per week for 25 weeks in total with 35 prospective teachers attending the courses Science and Technology Laboratory Practice I and II in the Sub-Department of Classroom Teaching, Department of Elementary Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University. ended questionnaire and semi-structured interviews.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The quantitative research findings indicated that the prospective teachers were successful in developing inquiry-based laboratory activities and that the program that was developed for that purpose was highly effective.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of the professional development program, which was developed to teach prospective teachers inquiry- and 5E model-based laboratory activities, on prospective classroom teachers' ability to develop laboratory activities and on their beliefs about inquiry-based approach and laboratory activities based on this approach. The professional development program that was developed for that purpose was implemented in the following three stages: "Theoretical foundations of inquiry-based approach", "Inquiry-based laboratory activities, inquiry-based approach, and laboratory activities", and "Implementation of the inquiry-based laboratory activities developed by prospective teachers". The research was conducted in two hours per week for 25 weeks in total with 35 prospective teachers attending the courses Science and Technology Laboratory Practice I and II in the Sub-Department of Classroom Teaching, Department of Elementary Education, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University. ended questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The quantitative research findings indicated that the prospective teachers were successful in developing inquiry-based laboratory activities and that the program that was developed for that purpose was highly effective. The qualitative research findings showed that the program increased the prospective teachers' confidence and interest in the courses. The prospective teachers stated that they felt more interested in the course so that their learning could be permanent at the end of the course. The professional development program played an important role in helping the prospective teachers understand the effect of inquiry-based approach on science learning and teaching, and realize the importance of experiments and the contributions of the practices to their professional development. Moreover, the prospective teachers believed that in that approach students participate actively so that they can develop their science process skills

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı sorgulayıcı araştırma yaklaşımına ve 5Emodelinedayalılaboratuvaretkinliklerininsınıföğretmeni adaylarınakavratılmasıamacıylageliştirilenmeslekigelişim programının; adayların laboratuvar etkinlikleri geliştirme becerilerine, sorgulayıcı araştırma yaklaşımına ve bu yaklaşıma uygun laboratuvar etkinliklerine ilişkin inançlarını belirlemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda geliştirilen mesleki gelişim programı; "Bilimsel sorgulama yaklaşımınınkuramsaltemelleri","Bilimselsorgulamayadayalılaboratuvar etkinlikleriyle, bilimsel sorgulama yaklaşımı ve laboratuvar etkinlikleri" ve "Öğretmen adayları tarafından geliştirilen bilimsel sorgulamaya dayalı laboratuvar etkinliklerinin uygulanması" olmak üzere üç aşamada yürütülmüştür. Çalışma, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi İlköğretim Bölümü Sınıf Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalında Fen ve Teknoloji Laboratuvar Uygulamaları I ve II derslerini alan 35 öğretmen adayı ile haftada 2 saat olmak üzere toplam 25 haftada tamamlanmıştır. Araştırmadahemnicelhemdenitelverikaynaklarıkullanılmıştır. Araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen "sorgulayıcıaraştırmaya dayalı laboratuvar etkinliklerini değerlendirme" anket formu araştırmanın nicel veri kaynağını oluşturmaktadır. Nitel veri kaynağıolarakdaaçıkuçlusoruformuveyarı-yapılandırılmışmülakatlarkullanılmıştır.Araştırmasonundaeldeedilennicelbulgular,adaylarınsorgulayıcıaraştırmayadayalılaboratuvaretkinliklerinigeliştirebilmedebaşarıolduklarınıvebubağlamda geliştirilen öğretim programının önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Araştırmanın nitel bulguları öğretmen adaylarının bu program sayesinde derse olan ilgilerinin arttığını ve özgüvenlerinin geliştiğini göstermektedir. Adaylar, bu program sonunda derse olan ilgilerininartarakkalıcı öğrenmelerinsağlanabileceğini belirtmişlerdir. Bu mesleki gelişim programı adayların, sorgulayıcıaraştırma yaklaşımının fen öğretimindeki ve öğrenimindeki etkisini kavrayarak, deneylerin önemini ve yaptıkları uygulamaların mesleki gelişimlerinesağladığıkatkılarıfarketmelerindedeönemliroloynamıştır. Ayrıca adaylar bu yaklaşımda öğrencilerin aktif olarak çalışmalarısayesindebilimselsüreçbecerileriningelişeceğine inanmaktadırlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBEN, N., FİTNAT, K. (2022). Laboratuvar Uygulamalarında Sorgulayıcı Araştırma ve 5E Modeli: Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarıİçin Geliştirilen Mesleki Gelişim Program. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 161–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/442578

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abell, S. K., Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a Enthusiast student teacher. Science Education,76 (6), 581-595. American Associati on for the Advancement of Science. (AAAS) (1990).
  2. Science for All Americans. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Atwood R. K., Atwood, V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the causes of seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 553- 563. Bhattacharyya, S. (2003). The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service Elementary student teachers' science teaching. Doctoral dissertation, The Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. Clifford, H. E. (1997). Romoting student inquiry: methods for developing the essential for inquıry-based investigating; ScienceTeacher, 64 (7), 18-21.
  4. Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiryprimer. ScienceScope 23 (6), 42-44.
  5. Dariel, J. H., Beijaard, D.,Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in cience education: the role of teacher practice knowledge. Journal of research in science teaching, 38 (2), 137-158
  6. Fay, M. E., Bretz, S. L. (2005). Levels of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2 (3), 3-11
  7. Fay, M. E., Grove, N. P., Towns, M. H., Bretz, S. L. (2007). A rubric to characterize inquiry in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2): 212-219.
  8. Hanson, D., Wolfskill, T. (2000). Process workshops-A new model for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 120-129.
  9. Hofstein, A., Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science: foundation for the21 st century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
  10. Kanlı, U., Temiz, B. K. (2006). The sufficiency of the numerical questions in the OSS examination in the year 2003 on the measurement of the students' scientific process skills. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 31(140), 62-67.
  11. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
  12. Ottander, C., Grelsson, G. (2006). Laboratory work: the teachers' perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 40 (3), 113-118.
  13. Psillos, D., Niedderer, H. (2002). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Secaucus, NJ: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  14. Qinga, Z., Jinga, G., Yanb, W. (2010). Promoting preservice teachers' critical thinking skills by inquiry-based chemical experiment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4597-4603. Schoon,