Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

The effect of surface modifications process in the elastomric impression materials on bubble entrapment in model material

Elastomerik ölçü maddelarinde yüzey modifikasyon yöntemlerinin model materyalinde kabarcık oluşumu üzerine etkisi

Pages
305–311
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results demonstrated that the surface modification methods applied to additional silicons are effective in order to obtain a good quality model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study, is to evaluate the bubble entrapment on model materials by performing var-ious surface modification methods on elastomeric impression materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While modification methods have increased on the wetting properties of the impression materials, they did not create an important difference on the bubble entrapment of the model materials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results demonstrated that the surface modification methods applied to additional silicons are effective in order to obtain a good quality model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study, is to evaluate the bubble entrapment on model materials by performing var-ious surface modification methods on elastomeric impression materials. For this purpose, additional type silicon based elastomeric impression materials have been used by taking in consideration to their superior properties. For surface modification procedures plasma and topical surface surfactant application methods have been used. For plasma treatment method, samples have been coated with acrylic acid. For surfactant modification a non-ionic type (Silwet) and a commercial (Delar), two different surfactants have been used. While modification methods have increased on the wetting properties of the impression materials, they did not create an important difference on the bubble entrapment of the model materials. These results demonstrated that the surface modification methods applied to additional silicons are effective in order to obtain a good quality model.

Özet

Çalışmamız amacı, elastomerik ölçü materyalleri üzerine uygulanan çeşitli yüzey modifikasyon yöntemlerinin model materyali üzerinde kabarcık oluşumuna etkisini değerlendirmektir. Çalışmamızda üstün özellikleri nedeniyle silikon esaslı ilave tipelastomerik ölçü materyalleri kullanılmıştır. Yüzey modifikasyonu için topikal sürfaktan ve plazma uygulaması yapılmıştır. Plazma metodunda yüzeyler, akrilik asit ile kaplanmıştır. Sürfaktan olarak non-iyonik tipte (Silwet) ve ticari bir ürün olan (Delar) kullanılmıştır. Modifikasyon metodları, model materyalinin kabarcık oluşumu üzerinde önemli etki yapmamıştır. Sonuçlarımız yüzey modifikasyonu ile kaliteli model elde edilebileceği görüşündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKUT, S., CAN, G. (2022). The effect of surface modifications process in the elastomric impression materials on bubble entrapment in model material. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 305–311. https://ajindex.com/articles/442300

References (19)

  1. Pratten D, Craig G. Wettability of a hydrophilic addition silicone impression material. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 197-202
  2. Chavaux E, Verdino J, Lin M. La mouillabilite des silikones hydrophiles. Cah Prothesel995; 91:37-41
  3. Özden N, İmirzalıoğlu P, Mutlu M. Wettability of some impression materials. Tübitak J Medical Sci 1995; 23: 43-7
  4. Biederman H. Plasma Polymerization Processes. Elseiver Science Publishers. B.V. 1992; Chapter 2
  5. Vassilakos N, Fernandes CP. Surface properties of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 21: 297-301
  6. Panichuttra B, Jones R, Goodacre C, Munoz C, Moore K. Hydrophilic poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability and effect on gypsum hardness. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4: 240-8
  7. Millar BJ, Dunne M, Nespit M. A comparison of three wetting agents used to facilitate, the pouring of dies. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 341- 4
  8. Cullen D, Mikesell J, Sandrik J. Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 261-5
  9. Waning AL. Yazışma 11.2.1999
  10. Norlihg BK, Reisbick MH. The effect of non- ionic surfactants on bubble entrapment in elas- tomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:342-7
  11. Tan E, Chai J, Wonziak W. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 541-7
  12. Fernandes C, Vassilakos N, Nilner K. Surface properties and castability of elastomeric impression materials after plasma cleaning. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 354-8
  13. Hesby R, Haganman C, Stanford C. Effects of radio frequency glow-discharge on impression material surface wettability. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 414-22
  14. Özden N, Ayhan H, Erkut S, Can G, Pişkin E. Coating of silicone-base impression materials in a glow-discharge system by acrilic acid plasma. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 174-8
  15. Saitoh M, Nishiyama M, Kaketani M, Kobari H, Ohashi M. A study on surface reproduction of dental stone models. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 1988; 30: 302-8
  16. Millstein PL. Determining the accuracy of gyp¬ sum casts made from type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil 1992; 19: 239-43
  17. Moser J, Stone D, Willoughby GM. Properties and characteristics of a resin die materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 34: 297-304
  18. Campbell S, Riley E, Sozio R. Evaluation of a new epoxy resin die materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54: 136-9
  19. Derrien G, Menn G. Evaluation of detail repro-