Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

The solubility of resin-based and conventional luting cements

Rezin esaslı geleneksel yapıştırma simanlarının çözünürlükleri

Pages
159–163
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Fixed prosthodontic restorations cemented with resin based luting cements may be capable of withstanding long-term clinical use compared with conventional luting agents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most common properties determining the durability of luting cements in the mouth is resistance against dissolution and disintegration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There is little information about the solubility of resin based luting cements although their use for routin cementation of restorations has increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Fixed prosthodontic restorations cemented with resin based luting cements may be capable of withstanding long-term clinical use compared with conventional luting agents.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the most common properties determining the durability of luting cements in the mouth is resistance against dissolution and disintegration. There is little information about the solubility of resin based luting cements although their use for routin cementation of restorations has increased. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the solubilities of resin composite and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements with three brands of conventional luting agents. A modification of the ADA spesification test was adopted to evaluate the solubilities of luting agents. The two types of media (distilled water and pH 4.0 lactic acid) in which specimens were stored for 30 days were prepared. Resin composite luting cement and resin- modified glass-ionomer cements were markedly less soluble than conventional luting cements in both types of media. The conventional glass ionomer and polycarboxylate cements showed the higher mean solubility values than phosphate cements (p0.05). Fixed prosthodontic restorations cemented with resin based luting cements may be capable of withstanding long-term clinical use compared with conventional luting agents.

Özet

Yapıştırma simanlarının ağız ortamındaki dayanıklılığını belirleyen en önemli özelliklerden biri çözünme ve bozunmaya karsı dirençleridir. Rezin esaslı simanların restorasyonların rutin simantasyonunda gittikçe yaygınlaşan kullanımlarına rağmen, çözünürlükleri konusunda sınırlı kaynak mevcuttur. Çalışmada rezin kompozit ve rezin-modifiye cam iyonomer yapıştırma simanlanmn çözünürlüklerinin üç farklı tip geleneksel simanla mukayeseli olarak değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Simanların çözünürlüklerinin incelenmesinde ADA spesifikasyon testinin bir modifikasyonu kullanılmış; örneklerin 30 gün süreyle saklandığı iki farklı tip ortam (distile su ve pH 4.0 laktik asit) hazırlanmıştır. Rezin kompozit yapıştırma simanı ile rezinmodifiye cam iyonomer simanlar geleneksel simanlara göre belirgin olarak daha düşük çözünürlük değerleri sergilemiş; cam iyonomer ve karboksilat simanda ise fosfat simana göre daha yüksek çözünürlük değerleri elde edilmiştir (p0.05). Sabit restorasyonlann rezin esaslı simanlarla yapıştırılması geleneksel simanlara göre daha uzun dönem klinik basan ile sonuçlanacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKALTAN, F. (2022). The solubility of resin-based and conventional luting cements. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 159–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/442268

References (17)

  1. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 280-301
  2. Yoshida K, Tanagawa M, Atsuta M. Invitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 285-91
  3. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, McMillen K, Clelland N. Solubility and sorption of resin-based luting cements. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 434-40
  4. Hersek NE, Canay Ş. In vivo solubility of three types of luting cement. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:211-6
  5. Bapna MS, Mueller HJ. Relative solubility of hybrid ionomers and compomers by acid impingement. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 786-90
  6. Bertacchini SM, Abate PF, Blank A, Baglieto MF Macchi RL. Solubility and fluoride release in ionomers and compomers. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 193-7
  7. Eichner K, Lautenschlager EP, Radnoth MV. Investigation concerning the solubility of dental cements. J Dent Res 1967; 47: 280-5
  8. Iwaku M, Takatsu T, Fusayama T. Comparison of three luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43:423-9
  9. Beech DR, Bandyopadhyay S. A new laboratory method for evaluating the relative Solubility and erosion of dental cements. J Oral Rehabil 1983;10: 57-64
  10. Mesu EP. Degradation of luting cements measured in vitor. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 665-71
  11. Fukazawa M, Matsuya S, Yamane M. Mechanism for erosion of glass-ionomer cements in acidic buffer solutions. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1770-5
  12. Fukazawa M, Matsuya S, Yamane M. The mechanism for erosion of glass-ionomer cements in organic acid buffer solutions. J Dent Res 1990;69: 1175-9
  13. Wilson AD. Specification test for the solubility and disintegration of dental cements: A critical evaluation of its meaning. J Dent Res 1976; 55:721-6
  14. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:11-5
  15. White SN, Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Caputo AA. Microleakage of new crown and fixed partial denture luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:156-61
  16. Mitchell CA. Douglas WH, Cheng YS. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 7-13
  17. Nicholson JW, McKenzie MA. The properties of polymerizable luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 767-74.