SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the diametral tensile strength and compressive strength of four different core materials

Dört farklı kor materyalinin çapsal gerilim direnci ve sıkıştırma direncinin incelenmesi

C. Burak YILMAZ
Yusuf Ziya BAYINDIR
Funda BAYINDIR
Pages
65–71
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Composite resin core material was significantly higher than the other tested materials (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study evaluated two mechanical properties of four core materials having different chemical structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A light-activated composite resin (President, Dynamic Universal Hybrit Composite, Miinchen, Germany), resin modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) (Vitremer, 3M Dental Product, St Paul, MN, USA), amalgam (Cavex, Avalloy, Harlem, Holland), and glass ianomer restorative material (Logofil, D-Dental Alten, Alten Walde, Germany) were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Composite resin core material was significantly higher than the other tested materials (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study evaluated two mechanical properties of four core materials having different chemical structures. A light-activated composite resin (President, Dynamic Universal Hybrit Composite, Miinchen, Germany), resin modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) (Vitremer, 3M Dental Product, St Paul, MN, USA), amalgam (Cavex, Avalloy, Harlem, Holland), and glass ianomer restorative material (Logofil, D-Dental Alten, Alten Walde, Germany) were used. Sixty-four samples (eight per product for each property) were prepared for according to American Dental Association specification No. 27. Thirty-two samples were prepared in cylindrical molds (3 mm in height, 6 mm in diameter) for diametral tensile strength (DTS). Thirty-two samples were prepared in cylindrical molds (6 mm in height, 3 mm in diameter) for compressive strength (CS) measurements. The specimens were prepared according to manufacturer's instructions and stored for 7 days at 37°C in 100 % humidity. Hounsfield press and pull machine were used at a crosshead speed 5mm/ min. SPSS 10.0 statistical software program were used for analysis of variance. Composite resin core material was significantly higher than the other tested materials (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada, dört farklı kor materyalinin iki mekanik özelliği değerlendirildi. Işıkla sertleşen kompozit rezin (President, Light cure Dynamic Universal hibrit Compozit, München, Germany), rezin modifiye cam iyonomer (RMCİS) (Vitremer, 3M Dental Products, St. Paul MN, USA), amalgam (Cavex Avalloy, Harlem, Holland) ve cam iyonomer (CİS) materyalleri (Logofil, D-Dental Alten, Alten Walde, Germany) kullanıldı. Çapsal germe direnci ve sıkıştırma direnci testi için her bir materyalden sekiz adet olmak üzere toplam 64 örnek American Dental Association 27 nolu spesifikasyonuna göre hazırlandı. 6mm çapında, 3mm kalınlığında 32 örnek çapsal gerilim testi için, 6mm yüksekliğinde, 3mm çapında 32 silindirik örnek sıkıştırma direnci testi için hazırlandı. Örnekler üretici firma önerileri doğrultusunda hazırlandı ve % 100 nemli ortamda 37 °C de bir hafta bekletildi. Testler Hounsfieldçekme-sıkıştırma makinesinde 5 mm/dk. hızla yapıldı. İstatistiksel değerlendirme için SPSS 10.0 programı kullanılarak varyans analizi uygulandı. Kompozit rezin materyali diğer materyallerden önemli derecede yüksek değerlere sahip oldu. (p

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, C. B., BAYINDIR, Y. Z., BAYINDIR, F. (2022). Evaluation of the diametral tensile strength and compressive strength of four different core materials. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 65–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/442232

References (18)

  1. Chan FW, Harcount JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of post cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J 1993; 38:39-45
  2. Keyf F, Şahin E. Retentive properties of three post-core systems. Aust Dent J 1994; 39:20-4
  3. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70:11-6
  4. Guzy GE, Nicholls J. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42: 39-44
  5. Trabert KC, Caputo AR, Abou-Ross M. Tooth fracture a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endodon 1978; 4: 341-5
  6. Alaçam T, Nalbant L, Alaçam A. İleri restorasyon teknikleri. Polat yayınlan: Ankara, pp 100-3, 1998
  7. Levartousky S, Kuyinu E, Georgescu M, Goldstein GR. A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass-ionomer material. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:481-5
  8. Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effect of temporary cementation on permanent cement retantion to composite resin cores. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67; 856-9
  9. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 11th ed. Mosby, St. Louis, p 247, 2002
  10. Larson TD, Jensen JR. Microleakage of composite resin and amalgam core material under complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 40-4
  11. Ziebert AJ. Dhure VB. The fracture toughness of various core materials. J Prosthodent 1995; 4:33-7
  12. Dayangaç B. Kompozit Resin Restorasyonlar. Güne;; Kıtabevi: Ankara, pp 92-5, 2000. 13-Alpaz R. Kompomer (resin modifiye cam ionomerler) İzmir Dişhekimliği Odası Dergisi 1996; 3: 24-36
  13. Zaimoğlu A, Can G Ersoy F, Aksu L. Diş hekimliğinde maddeler bilgisi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi 1993; 334-41
  14. Combee EC, Shaglouf MS, Walts DC, Wilson NHT. Mechanical properties of direct core build up materials. Dental Materials 1999; 15: 158-65
  15. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clark HE. Long term F release from glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1984; 63:158-60
  16. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:584-90
  17. Hysmans MC, Vander Vast PG. Mechanical longevity estimation model for post and core restorations. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 252-7
  18. Yıldız M. Sonlu elemanlar ve mekanik stress analiz yöntemleri kullanılarak post-core restorasyonların kuvvet altındaki davran