The evaluation of the distribution as to age and sex for the treatment method given to the patients applying to the Prosthodontic Department in the years between 1988 and 2000
1988-2000 yılları arasında Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilimdalına başvuran hastalara uygulanan tedavilerin yaşa ve cinsiyete göre dağılımının incelenmesi
The most applied denture type became removable ones.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In our study, types of prosthetic treatments given to the patients applying to the Prosthodontic clinic between 1988-2000, and the distribution according to the year, age and sex, were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The age of the patients applying to our department ranged between 16 and 90, and the males were the higher group in respect to the number, and the treatment given.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most applied denture type became removable ones.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In our study, types of prosthetic treatments given to the patients applying to the Prosthodontic clinic between 1988-2000, and the distribution according to the year, age and sex, were examined. The age of the patients applying to our department ranged between 16 and 90, and the males were the higher group in respect to the number, and the treatment given. The most applied denture type became removable ones.
Özet
Çalışmamızda; 1988-2000 yılları arasında Protetik Diş Tedavisi kliniğine başvuran hastalara uygulanan protetik tedavi şekilleri, yıllara, cinsiyete ve yaşa göre dağılımı incelenmiştir. Kliniğimize başvuran hastaların yaşları; 16-90 arasında olup, yapılan tedavi ve başvuran hasta sayısı olarak en yüksek miktarı erkek hastalar oluşturmuştur. En çok uygulanan protez tipi ise hareketli protezler olmuştur.
🔖
Cite This Article
BAYINDIR, F., BAYDAŞ, S., YILMAZ, C. B., AKYIL, M. Ş. (2022). The evaluation of the distribution as to age and sex for the treatment method given to the patients applying to the Prosthodontic Department in the years between 1988 and 2000. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 29–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/452877