Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Mandibuler overdenture retained with ball attachments: A clinical evaluation

Topuz tutuculu mandibuler overdenture: Klinik değerlendirme

Pages
107–113
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were no failure depending on cementation.The high success of the present study could be attributed to appropriate sellection of the case with suitable crown-root ratio, motivated age of the selected patient, and precise clinical and laboratory work affords.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An overdenture is a prosthesis that derives support from residual one or more abutment teeth in the dental arch following extraction procedures, by completely enclosing them beneath its impres¬sion surface.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mandibular Kennedy Class I mod 1 cases, (two canines opposing to complete maxillary den¬tures) patients were treated by overdentures with post retained ball attachments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were no failure depending on cementation.The high success of the present study could be attributed to appropriate sellection of the case with suitable crown-root ratio, motivated age of the selected patient, and precise clinical and laboratory work affords.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

An overdenture is a prosthesis that derives support from residual one or more abutment teeth in the dental arch following extraction procedures, by completely enclosing them beneath its impres¬sion surface. Mandibular Kennedy Class I mod 1 cases, (two canines opposing to complete maxillary den¬tures) patients were treated by overdentures with post retained ball attachments. Fifteen patients with the age group 45-65 were treated overdentures with post retained ball attachments and clinically were evaluated for 3 years. Clinical evaluations were performed both abutment teeth and overdentures by means of plaque index, gingival index, mobility, secondary caries and stability and retention.After three years wear, all dentures were in acceptable condition for both patients and clini¬cians. Additionally, all canines had acceptable peri¬odontal health because of appropriate denture design and optimal oral hygiene regime obtained from all patients. There were no failure depending on cementation.The high success of the present study could be attributed to appropriate sellection of the case with suitable crown-root ratio, motivated age of the selected patient, and precise clinical and laboratory work affords.

Özet

Overdenture, yapılan diş çekimlerinin ardından arkta geride kalan bir ya da daha fazla dişi tamamen kapsayarak onlardan destek alan protez türüdür. Mandibuler Kennedy Sınıf I modifikasyon 1 vakaları, başka bir deyişle mandibuler arkta sadece kanin dişlerinin yer aldığı ve karşıt arkın tamamen dişsiz olduğu vakalar, alt çenede topuz tutuculu kopinglerden yararlanılarak overdenture ile, üst çenede tam protezler ile rehabilite edildi. Kanin dişlerine uygulanan topuz tutuculu kopingler, post-kor şeklinde döküm yolu ile elde edildi, ilave retansiyon ve kök desteği sağlandı. Yaşları 45 ile 65 arasında değişen 15 hasta 3 yıl süre ile klinik olarak takip edildi. Klinik değerlendirmeler, destek dişler ve overdenture olarak tasarlanan protezlerde, plak indeks, gingival indeks, mobilite, sekonder çürük ve stabilite ve tutuculuk kriterleri esas alınarak gerçekleştirildi. Üç yıl kullanım sonrasında tüm protezlerin ve destek dişlerin hem hasta hem de hekim için kabul edilebilir durumda olduğu saptandı. Mevcut kanin dişlerin periodontal sağlıklarının da protezlerin uygun tasarımı ve hastaların yüksek seviyede oral hijyen performansı sergilemeleri sonucunda kabul edilebilir seviyede olduğu tespit edildi. Simantasyona bağlı başarısızlık gözlenmedi. Bu çalışmanın yüksek başarı oranı, kanin desteklerinde uygun kron/kök oranının sağlanması, hastaların yüksek seviyede oral hijyen performansına sahip olmaları,önerilen tavsiyelere uymaları, titiz klinik ve laboratuvar çalışmalarına bağlanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜÇTAŞLI, S., LEYLEK, S. S. (2022). Mandibuler overdenture retained with ball attachments: A clinical evaluation. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 107–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/442226

References (15)

  1. Basker RM. Harrison A. Ralph JP. Overdentures in general dental practice. 2nd ed William Clowes Lim, Beccles 1988; 1-77
  2. Heartwell Jr. CM, Rahn AO. Syllabus of complete dentures. Lea & Febiger Philadelphia 1980; 483-501
  3. Schwartz IS, Morrow RM. Overdentures principles and procedures. In: Engelmeier RL. Complete dentures. Dent Clin North Am 1996; 40: 169-94
  4. Lamb DJ. Problems and solutions in complete denture prosthodontics. Quintessence Publ Co. London 1993; 36-41
  5. Crum J, Rooney GE. Alveolar bone loss in overdentures: a five year study. I Prosthet Dent 1978; 40: 610-3
  6. Bolender CL, Smith DE, Toolson LB. Overdentures: their effectiveness and clinical considerations in treating the partially dentate mouth. In: Bates IF, Neill DJ, Preiskel HW. Restoration of the partially dentate mouth. Quintessence Publ Co, 1984; 127-46
  7. Atovi A, Jerolimov V, Ati. A Tooth loss and the condition of the prosthodontic appliances in a group of elderly home residents. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 199-204
  8. Morrow RM, Brewer AA. Examination, diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. In Brewer AA, Morrow RM. Overdentures, 2nd ed. St. Louis, CV Mosby. 1980; 121-8
  9. Toolson LB, Taylor TD. A 10-vear report of a longitudinal recall of overdenture patients. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 179-81
  10. Silness J. Löe H. Periodontal disease m pregnancy. II. Corelation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odont Scand 1963; 22: 121-35
  11. Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalance and severity. Acta Odont Scand 1963; 21: 533-51
  12. Rissin L, Houn JE, Manly RS, Kapur KK. Clinical comparison of masticatory performance and electromyographic activity of patients with complete dentures, overdentures and natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 508-13. 13. von Wowern N, Gotfredsen K. Implant-supported overdentures, a prevention of bone loss in edentulous mandibles?Clin Oral Imp Res 2001:12:19-23
  13. Jagger RG, Shaikh S, Jagger DC. Clinical effectiveness of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. Prim Dent Care 2001; 8:19-24
  14. Meijer HJA, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA, Geertman ME. Van Oort RP. Implant retained mandibular overdentures compared with complete dentures; a 5 years' follow up study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Imp Res 1999; 10: 238-42
  15. Glantz POJ, Nilner K. Jendresen MD, Sundberg H. Quality of fixed prosthodontics after twenty-two years. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:213-8.