Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Clinical evaluation of ceramic veneers cemented with two different types of two step adhesive systems and dual cure composite resin luting cements

İki farklı iki aşamalı adeziv sistem ve dual sertleşen kompozit rezin yapıştırma simanı ile yapıştırılan seramik veneerlerin klinik değerlendirilmesi

Pages
201–211
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No debonding with no caries indicated that, resin bonded acid etched ceramic veneer restorations are functioning satisfactorily with no negative periodontal response.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical performance and durability of ceramic veneers, cemented with dual cure composite resin (Rely X ARC, 3M-ESPE, Germany and Panavia F, Kuraray, Holland), utilising with two different types of dental ceramic adhesive sytems, either two step smear layer removing system (Single Bond, 3M-ESPE, Germany) or two step smear layer dissolving system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2, Kuraray, Holland).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Clinical performance of cemented restoration were evaluated 3 years after cementation every 6 months period, based on United States Public Health Service Criteria by means of retention, anatomic form, color stability, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration and secondary caries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No debonding with no caries indicated that, resin bonded acid etched ceramic veneer restorations are functioning satisfactorily with no negative periodontal response.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical performance and durability of ceramic veneers, cemented with dual cure composite resin (Rely X ARC, 3M-ESPE, Germany and Panavia F, Kuraray, Holland), utilising with two different types of dental ceramic adhesive sytems, either two step smear layer removing system (Single Bond, 3M-ESPE, Germany) or two step smear layer dissolving system (Clearfil Liner Bond 2, Kuraray, Holland). Clinical performance of cemented restoration were evaluated 3 years after cementation every 6 months period, based on United States Public Health Service Criteria by means of retention, anatomic form, color stability, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration and secondary caries. Additionally, plaque index and gingival index were evaluated. As a conclusion, both adhesive systems performed durable adhesive bond, at least in three year clinical service. No debonding with no caries indicated that, resin bonded acid etched ceramic veneer restorations are functioning satisfactorily with no negative periodontal response.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, biri smear tabakasını uzaklaştıran (Single Bond, 3M-ESPE-Germahy) diğeri smear tabakasını çözen (Clearfil Liner Bond 2, Kuraray, Holland), farklı iki adeziv sistem ve dual sertleşen kompozit rezîn yapıştırma simanı(Rely X ARC, 3M-ESPE, Germany ve Panavia F, Kuraray, Holland), kullanılarak yapıştırılan seramik veneerlerin, klinik performans ve devamlılığının değerlendirilmesidir. Klinik değerlendirme, Birleşik Devletler Halk Sağlığı Hizmet Kriterleri esas alınarak, restorasyonun yapıştırılmasından sonra, 6 aylık kontrollarla 3 yıl boyunca gerçekleştirildi. Bunlara ilaveten, plak indeks ve gingival indeks değerlendirmesi de gerçekleştirildi. Her iki adeziv sistemin, en az üç yıl klinik kullanım sonucunda, dayanıklı adeziv bağlanma sağladığı sonucuna varıldı. Rezin bağlı asit ile pürüzlendirilmiş seramik veneer restorasyonların, bağlantı kopması ve sekonder çürük gözlenmemesi ile beraber olumsuz periodontal cevap oluşturmadan tatmin edici fonksiyon sağladığı tesbit edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜÇTAŞLI, S., TÜRKASLAN, S. (2022). Clinical evaluation of ceramic veneers cemented with two different types of two step adhesive systems and dual cure composite resin luting cements. Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 201–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/439604

References (11)

  1. Phillips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials. 9th ed. W.B. Saunders Company, 1991; 525-7
  2. Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition. A biomimetic approach. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, 2002:239-91
  3. Touati B, Miara P. Nathanson D, Giordano R. Esthetic dentistry and ceramic restorations. Martin Dunitz Ltd, 1999; 161-213
  4. Jordan RE. Esthetic composite bonding, techniques and materials. 2nd ed. Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1993; 132-62
  5. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Br Dent J 1993; 175: 317-21
  6. Kihn PW, Barnes DM. The clinical longevity of porcelain veneers: A 48-month clinical evaluation. JADA 1998; 129: 747-52
  7. Meijering AC, Creugers NHJ, Roeters FJM. Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim report. J Dent 1998; 26: 563-8
  8. Dumfahrt H. Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II. Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 9-f8. 9. van Dijken JWV, Hasselrot L, Örmin A, Olofsson A-L. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 222-9. 10. van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhe-sives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20
  9. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 198-210
  10. Hoffding J. Mastique laminate veneers: Results after 4 and 10 years of service. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53: 283-6
  11. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 279-89.