SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injection in the Conservative Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Kortikosteroid Enjeksiyonunun Subakromiyal Sıkışma Sendromunun Konservatif Tedavisinde Etkinliği

Safa GÜRSOY
Pages
683–639
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in favor of Group 2 (combination of physical therapy and injection) in terms of VAS and ASES scores at months 3 and 6 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of physical therapy and the combination of physical therapy and subacromial corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 56 patients aged between 30‐65, who did not have a rotator cuff tear and were diagnosed with SIS, were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in favor of Group 2 (combination of physical therapy and injection) in terms of VAS and ASES scores at months 3 and 6 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of physical therapy and the combination of physical therapy and subacromial corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Materials and Methods: 56 patients aged between 30‐65, who did not have a rotator cuff tear and were diagnosed with SIS, were enrolled in this study. Group 1 (n=26) constituted by patients who were only receiving physical therapy and Group 2 (n=30) constituted by patients who were receiving the combination of physical therapy and subacromial corticosteroid injection were compared using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores at post‐treatments months 3, 6 and 12 in comparison to the pre‐treatment period. Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in favor of Group 2 (combination of physical therapy and injection) in terms of VAS and ASES scores at months 3 and 6 (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı omuz subakromial sıkışma sendromunun (SSS) tedavisinde tek başına fiziktedavi ile fizik tedavi ile kombine subakromial kortikosteroid enjeksiyonu uygulamasının etkinliğininkarşılaştırılmasıdır.Materyal ve Metot: 30‐65 yaş arası, rotator kılıf yırtığı olmayan 56 SSS tanısı alan hasta çalışmaya dahiledildi. Yalnızca fizik tedavi alan hastaların oluşturduğu Grup 1(n=26) ile fizik tedavi ile birliktesubakromial kortikosteroid enjeksiyonu yapılan hastaların oluşturduğu Grup 2(n=30), işlem öncesidöneme kıyasla 3., 6. ve 12. ayda ölçülen Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ve American Shoulder and ElbowSurgeons (ASES) skorlamaları kullanılarak karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: Her iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık 3. ve 6. ay VAS ve ASES skorlarında Grup 2(fizik tedaviile birlikte enjeksiyon uygulaması) lehine bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSOY, S. (2022). Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injection in the Conservative Treatment of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 683–639. https://ajindex.com/articles/442003

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Chard M, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB. Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum 1991;34:766–9
  2. Picavet HS, Schouten JS. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)‐study. Pain 2003;102:167–78. 3. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics and management. Ann Rheum Dis 1995;54:959–64
  3. Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54(1):41–50
  4. Hanchard NC1, Goodchild L, Thompson J, O'Brien T, Davison D, Richardson C. Evidence‐based clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, assessment and physiotherapy management of contracted (frozen) shoulder: quick reference summary. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(2):117‐20
  5. Neer CS. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;173:70–7
  6. Neer CS, Welsh RP. The shoulder in sports. Orthop Clin North Am 1977;8: 583–91
  7. Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC. Impingement syndrome in athletes. Am J Sports Med 1980;8:151–8
  8. Dorrestijn O, Stevens M, Winters JC, van der Meer K, Diercks RL. Conservative or surgical treatment for subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18(4):652–60
  9. Gebremariam L, Hay EM, Koes BW, Huisstede BM. Effectiveness of surgical and postsurgical interventions for the subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011;92(11):1900–13
  10. Kibler WB, McMullen J, Uhl T. Shoulder rehabilitation strategies, guidelines and practice. Orthop Clin N Am 2001;32:527–38
  11. Engebretsen K, Grotle M, Bautz‐Holter E, Sandvik J, Juel NG, Ekeberg OM, Brox JL. Radial extracorporeal shockwave treatment compared with supervised exercises in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: single blind randomised study. BMJ 2009;339:b3360
  12. Crawshaw DP, Helliwell PS, Hensor EM, Hay EM, Aldous SJ, Conaghan PG. Exercise therapy after corticosteroid injection for moderate to severe shoulder pain: large pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ 2010;340:c3037
  13. Holmgren T, Bjornsson Hellgren H, Oberg B, Adolfsson L, Johansson K. Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. BMJ 2012;344:e787
  14. Ottenheijm RP, Jansen MJ, Staal JB, van den Bruel A, Weijers RE, de Bie RA. Accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound in patients wit