Journals / Anatomy / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Macroscopic footprint of the glenoid labrum

Journal
Anatomy
Pages
168–173
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is suggested that the most important step in the stabilization of joint laxity is appropriate placement of the sutures in the anterior and inferior aspects of the glenoid labrum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Glenoid labrum lesions are one of the main causes of traumatic shoulder dislocations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, this studyaimed to describe the macroscopic footprint of the glenoid labrum in order to depict the ideal anchor placement locationprecisely.Methods: Twenty-two shoulders from 11 cadavers were dissected to reveal glenoid labrum.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is suggested that the most important step in the stabilization of joint laxity is appropriate placement of the sutures in the anterior and inferior aspects of the glenoid labrum.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Glenoid labrum lesions are one of the main causes of traumatic shoulder dislocations. Arthroscopic or openrepair using suture anchors is commonly used to treat labral lesions. Proper placement of suture anchors in order to replacethe normal ligamentous restraint is essential to restore normal anatomy that determines the final location of the repairedlabrum. Yet, the most efficient and safest location of the glenoid bone has not been precisely described. Therefore, this studyaimed to describe the macroscopic footprint of the glenoid labrum in order to depict the ideal anchor placement locationprecisely.Methods: Twenty-two shoulders from 11 cadavers were dissected to reveal glenoid labrum. Clock positions were determinedon glenoid labrum circumferentially to evaluate the footprint of the glenoid labrum. The distance between the bony edge of theglenoid rim and the edge of the labrum was measured.Results: The mean distance from the glenoid labrum to the bony glenoid rim was measured as 5.1 mm (3 o’clock position), 6.2mm (6 o’clock position), 5.1 mm (9 o’clock position) and 4.1 mm (12 o’clock position) in the anterior, inferior, posterior andsuperior aspects, respectively. 29.3% of the specimens had a completely defective anterior labrum.Conclusion: Location of the labrum with respect to the bony glenoid rim should be considered for proper suture placementsin treatment of labral tears. It is suggested that the most important step in the stabilization of joint laxity is appropriate placement of the sutures in the anterior and inferior aspects of the glenoid labrum.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, M. E., KAYA, Ö., APAYDIN, N., GÜRSOY, S., BOZKURT, M., AKKAYA, M. (2022). Macroscopic footprint of the glenoid labrum. Anatomy, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 168–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/439454

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Cooper DE, Arnoczky SP, O’Brien SJ, Warren RF, DiCarlo E, Allen AA. Anatomy, histology, and vascularity of the glenoid labrum. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:46–52
  2. Barthel T, Konig U, Bohm D, Loehr JF, Gohlke F. Anatomy of the glenoid labrum. [Article in German] Orthopäde 2003;32:578–85
  3. Tischer T, Putz R. Anatomy of the superior labrum complex of the shoulder. [Article in German] Orthopäde 2003;32:572–7
  4. Alashkham A, Alraddadi A, Felts P, Soames R. Histology, vascularity and innervation of the glenoid labrum. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018;26:2309499018770900
  5. Sailer J, Imhof H. Shoulder instability. [Article in German] Radiologe 2004;44:578–90
  6. Antonio GE, Griffith JF, Yu AB, Yung PS, Chan KM, Ahuja AT. First-time shoulder dislocation. High prevalence of labral injury and age-related differences revealed by MR arthrography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:983–91
  7. Valis P, Nydrle M. Arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder using anchors. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2003;70:233–36
  8. Zarzycki W. Arthroscopic Bankart repair. [Article in Polish] Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2006;71:309–11
  9. Lehtinen JT, Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Ticker JB, Warner JJ. Anatomy of the superior glenoid rim. Repair of superior labral anterior to posterior tears. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:257–60
  10. Rowe CR, Zarins B, Ciullo JV. Recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder after surgical repair. Apparent causes of failure and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:159–68
  11. Zhu W, Lu W, Zhang L, Han Y, Ou Y, Peng L, Liu H, Wang D, Zeng Y. Arthroscopic findings in the recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014;24:699–705
  12. Wiedemann E, Jager A, Nebelung W. Pathomorphology of shoulder instability. [Article in German] Orthopäde 2009;38:16–20, 22–3
  13. Slabaugh MA, Friel NA, Wang VM, Cole BJ. Restoring the labral height for treatment of Bankart lesions: a comparison of suture anchor constructs. Arthroscopy 2010;26:587–91
  14. Koulalis D, Kendoff D, Citak M, O’Loughlin PF, Pearle AD. Freehand versus navigated glenoid anchor positioning in anterior labral repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:1554–7
  15. Carreira DS, Mazzocca AD, Oryhon J, Brown FM, Hayden JK, Romeo AA. A prospective outcome evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34:771–7
  16. Boileau P, Ahrens P. The TOTS (temporary outside traction suture): a new technique to al