SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

e-Learning Readiness of Medical Educators: A Sample from Gazi University

Tıp Fakültesi Öğretim Üyelerinin e-öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk Düzeyleri: Gazi Üniversitesi Örneği

Işıl İrem BUDAKOĞLU
Özlem COŞKUN
Vildan ÖZEKE
Serdar KULA
Pages
175–185
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Women in the EOKG subscale have significantly lower levels of self-confidence than men (t(99) = 2.251; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The e-learning readiness of an individual; can be thought as the ability to utilize the possibilities of information and communication technologies (ICT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This study is a descriptive research and data was collected from 106 volunteer faculty members by using convenience sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Women in the EOKG subscale have significantly lower levels of self-confidence than men (t(99) = 2.251; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The e-learning readiness of an individual; can be thought as the ability to utilize the possibilities of information and communication technologies (ICT). The purpose of this study is to determine the level of e-learning readiness of medical educators. Materials and Methods: This study is a descriptive research and data was collected from 106 volunteer faculty members by using convenience sampling method. The data collection tool includes demographic information, the technologies that faculty members have, and optional & open-ended questions that determine the use of these technologies. In addition, the e-learning readiness scale (ELRS) was used for the faculty members. The data were analyzed with 95% confidence interval by using SPSS 17.0 software. Results: The mean age of the participants was around 49 and the 58% were females. Faculty members’ self-efficacy of ICT usage was high (BİTKÖY: 5.91 ± 1.08). However, their self-confidence in e-learning (EOKG: 2.94 ± 1.32) and their attitudes towards e-learning (EOYT: 3.82 ± 1.39) was very low. In addition, their training need for e-learning (EOYEI: 4.34 ± 1.50) was also high. The instructors have sufficient technological equipment and they also have constant internet connection. Instructors use the internet mostly for scientific studies (85%) during the day. Women in the EOKG subscale have significantly lower levels of self-confidence than men (t(99) = 2.251; p

Özet

Amaç: Bireyin e-öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluğu; bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin (BİT) olanaklarından yararlanma becerisi olarak düşünülebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı tıp fakültesi öğretim üyelerinin e-öğrenme hazır bulunuşluk düzeylerinin belirlenmesidir. Materyal ve Metot: Bu çalışma, betimsel bir araştırma olup, elverişli örnekleme yöntemiyle gönüllü 106 kişiden veri toplanmıştır. Veri toplama formu demografik bilgiler, öğretim üyelerinin sahip oldukları teknolojiler ve bu teknolojileri kullanma durumlarını belirleyen seçenekli ve açık uçlu sorular içermektedir. Ayrıca öğretim üyeleri için e-öğrenme hazır bulunuşluk ölçeği (EÖHB) kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen tüm veriler %95 güven aralığında ve SPSS 17.0 yazılımı ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 49 civarında olup, %58’i kadındır. Öğretim üyelerinin BİT kullanımı öz yeterliği (BİTKÖY: 5,91±1,08) yüksektir. Ancak e-öğrenmede kendilerine güvenleri (EÖKG: 2,94±1,32) ve e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutumları (EÖYT: 3,82±1,39) oldukça düşüktür. Ayrıca e-öğrenmeye yönelik eğitim ihtiyaçları (EÖYEİ: 4,94±1,50) da yüksektir. Öğretim üyelerinin sahip oldukları teknolojik donanımlar yeterli olup, sürekli internet erişimleri de vardır. Öğretim üyeleri gün içerisinde interneti daha çok bilimsel çalışmalar için (%85) kullanmaktadır. EÖKG alt boyutunda kadınlar erkeklerden anlamlı olarak daha düşük güvene sahiptir (t(99)= 2,251; p

🔖

Cite This Article

BUDAKOĞLU, I. İ., COŞKUN, Ö., ÖZEKE, V., KULA, S. (2022). e-Learning Readiness of Medical Educators: A Sample from Gazi University. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 175–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/441998

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2016;18(1):e2
  2. Makhdoom N, Khoshhal KI, Algaidi S, Heissam K, Zolaly MA. ‘Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 2013;8(1):12-7
  3. Hannafin N, Phillips RM. Applying the Flipped Classroom to the Clinical Skills Laboratory. Nurse Educator. 2017;42(5):254
  4. Jones-Bonofiglio KD, Willett T, Ng S. An evaluation of flipped e-learning experiences. Medical Teacher 2017:1-9
  5. Eslaminejad T, Masood M, Ngah NA. Assessment of instructors' readiness for implementing e-learning in continuing medical education in Iran. Med Teach 2010;32(10):e407-12
  6. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd Edition ed. New York, USA: The Free Press; 1983
  7. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 1989;35(8):982-1003
  8. Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13(3):319-40
  9. Aydın CH, Taşcı D. Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflections from an Emerging Country. Educational Technology & Society 2005;8(4):244-57
  10. Timmings C, Khan S, Moore JE, Marquez C, Pyka K, Straus SE. Ready, Set, Change! Development and usability testing of an online readiness for change decision support tool for healthcare organizations. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2016;16:24
  11. Jawaid M, Aly SM. 'E-learning' modalities in the current era of Medical Education in Pakistan. Pakistan J Med Sci 2014;30(5):1156-8
  12. Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher 2008;30(5):455-73
  13. Lopes CT. Evaluating e-learning readiness in a health sciences higher education institution. IADIS International Conference of E-learning Proceedings. Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS Press; 2007:59-67
  14. Watkins R, Leigh D, Triner D. Assessing Readiness for E-Learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly 2004;17(4):66-79
  15. Kalelioğlu F, Baturay MH. E-Öğrenme için Hazır bulunuşluk Öz Değerlendirme ÖlçeğininTürkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Başkent University Journal of Education 2014;1(2):22-30
  16. Akaslan D, Law EL-C. Measuring Te