Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Quality of Life of Elders Living in Nursing Homes and in Their Homes and the Relationship with Socio‐Demographic Factors

Huzurevinde ve Evde Yaşayan Yaşlılarda Yaşam Kalitelerinin Karşılaştırılması ve Bu Durumun Sosyo‐Demografik Faktörlerle İlişkisi

Pages
552–561
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The older age, marital status, higher education level, increase in theincome, and not having children negatively affect the quality of life in individuals living in their homes.In elderly people living in senior centers, advanced age, female gender and having a chronic illnessnegatively affect the quality of life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Improving the quality of life for the rapidly growing elderly population plays a key role ingood health standards.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to compare the quality of life of elderly people living in theirhome and senior centers, and to determine socio‐demographic factors that could affect their quality oflife.Materials and Methods: In this study, we enrolled 400 people aged ≥65 years; 198 of them were elderlywho applied for any reason to Etfal Training and Research Hospital Family Medicine Policlinic, betweenFebruary‐October 2014; and 202 of them were living in Nursing Homes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The older age, marital status, higher education level, increase in theincome, and not having children negatively affect the quality of life in individuals living in their homes.In elderly people living in senior centers, advanced age, female gender and having a chronic illnessnegatively affect the quality of life.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: Improving the quality of life for the rapidly growing elderly population plays a key role ingood health standards. This study aims to compare the quality of life of elderly people living in theirhome and senior centers, and to determine socio‐demographic factors that could affect their quality oflife.Materials and Methods: In this study, we enrolled 400 people aged ≥65 years; 198 of them were elderlywho applied for any reason to Etfal Training and Research Hospital Family Medicine Policlinic, betweenFebruary‐October 2014; and 202 of them were living in Nursing Homes. The survey questioned sociodemographicfeatures and the Turkish version of quality of life developed by World Health Organizationwas applied.Results: We examined 400 people [188(47%) males and 212(53%) females]. Of these, 202 (50.50%;average age=73.266.68 years) were living in their homes and 198(49.50%; average age: 73.197.27 years)in senior centers. Furthermore, the physical, psychological, social and environmental field scores ofpeople living in their homes were significantly higher than those living in senior centers (P < 0.001).Conclusion: This study reveals that the quality of life is higher in elderly who live in their homes thanthose who live in nursing homes. The older age, marital status, higher education level, increase in theincome, and not having children negatively affect the quality of life in individuals living in their homes.In elderly people living in senior centers, advanced age, female gender and having a chronic illnessnegatively affect the quality of life.

Özet

Amaç: Hızla artan yaşlı nüfusta yaşam kalitesinin iyileştirilmesi, iyi sağlık standardı için anahtar rol oynamaktadır. Araştırmamızda huzurevinde ve kendi evinde yaşayan yaşlıların yaşam kalitelerini etkileyen faktörler tespit edilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmaya Mart‐Kasım 2014 tarihleri arasında Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Hastanesi Aile Hekimliği Polikliniğine başvuran 65 yaş ve üstü 198 birey ile huzurevinde yaşayan 202 birey olmak üzere toplam 400 kişi alındı. Araştırmamızda kişilerin sosyodemeografik bilgilerini sorgulayan bir anket formu ve Dünya Sağlık Örgütü tarafından geliştirilen yaşam kalitesi ölçeği kısa formunun Türkçe versiyonu uygulandı. Bulgular: Çalışmamıza 188’i (%47,00) erkek ve 212’si (%53,00) kadın olmak üzere toplam 400 hasta katıldı. Bunların 202'sini (%50,50) kendi evinde kalan bireyler 198'ini (%49,50) ise huzurevinde kalan bireylerdi. Hastaların yaş ortalaması kendi evinde kalanlarda 73,266,68 iken huzurevinde kalanlarda 73,197,27 idi. Kendi evinde yaşayanların bedensel, ruhsal, sosyal ilişkiler ve çevre alanı skoru huzurevinde kalanlardan anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, B. G., TOPRAK, D. (2022). Comparison of Quality of Life of Elders Living in Nursing Homes and in Their Homes and the Relationship with Socio‐Demographic Factors. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 552–561. https://ajindex.com/articles/441960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Turkish Geriatrics Society National Elderly Week Press Release [Internet]. http://www.turkgeriatri.org/pdf/basin_aciklamasi_mart_2010.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 09.08.2018). [Internet] Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/. Erişim Tarihi: 09.08.2018
  2. Arslan S, Kutsal YG. A Multigenter Epidemiological Study to Evaluate the Prevalance of Disability in the Elderly. Turkish J Geriatrics 1999;3:103‐14
  3. Altay B, Avcı A. The relation between the self care strength and life satisfaction of the elderly living in nursing home. Dicle Medical Journal 2009;4:275‐82
  4. Kanauchi M, Kubo A, Kanauchi K, Saito Y. Frailty, health‐related quality of life and mental well‐being in older adults with cardiometabolic risk factors. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Sep; 62(9): 1447‐51. (doi: 10.1111/j.1742‐1241.2008.01830.
  5. Sivertsen H, Bjorklof GH, Engedal K, Selbaek G, Helvik AS. Depression and quality of life in older persons: a review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015; 40(5‐6): 311‐39. (doi: 10.1159/000437299)
  6. Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Policy. Service institutions for old age. [Internet]. http://www.ozurluveyasli.gov.tr/tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.08.2018)
  7. Turkish Ministry of Family and Social Policy. Aged Care Services [Internet]. http://www.shcek.gov.tr/yasli‐bakim‐hizmetleri.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 19.08.2018). 8. [Internet]. https://www.aile.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 06.12.2018)
  8. Sucaklı MH, Bakan B, Çelik M. Evaluation of the quality of life and affecting factors in the elderly living in nursing homes. Turkish Journal of Family Practice 2013;17(3):96‐100
  9. Simeão SFAP et al. Comparative study of quality of life of elderly nursing home residents and those attneding a day Center. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2018; 23(11):3923‐3934. (doi: 10.1590/1413‐ 812320182311.21742016)
  10. Serbim AK, Figueiredo AEPL. Qualidade de vida de idosos em um grupo de convivência. Scientia Medica 2011; 21(4):166‐72
  11. Vitorino LM, Paskulin LMG, Vianna LAC. Quality of life of seniors living in the community and in long term care facilities: a comparative study. Rev Latino‐Am. Enfermagem 2013; 21(Spec):3‐11
  12. Araujo GS, Gatti MAN, De Conti MHS, De Vitta A, Marta SN, Simeão SFAP. Qualidade de vida de idosos residentes na Vila Vicentina de Bausu/SP. Salusvita 2014; 33(1):57‐75
  13. Vitorino LM, Paskulin LMG, Vianna LAC. Quality of life among older adults resident in longstay care facilities. Rev Latino‐Am. Enfermagem 2012; 20(6):1186‐ 95
  14. Aydın S, Karaoğlu L. The Quality of Life