SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

How Should Counseling Be Done in Health Screenings?

Sağlık Taramalarında Danışmanlık Nasıl Yapılmalıdır?

Yusuf ÜSTÜ
Basri Furkan DAĞCIOĞLU
Pages
199–204
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is important for physicians to inform patients about the benefit / damage ratio related to the suggested PHE by the principles of interviewer model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Periodic Health Evaluation (PHE) is the assessment at a frequency that is shaped according to the age, gender, and risk factors of healthy‐looking people.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An important component of this assessment is screening tests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is important for physicians to inform patients about the benefit / damage ratio related to the suggested PHE by the principles of interviewer model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Periodic Health Evaluation (PHE) is the assessment at a frequency that is shaped according to the age, gender, and risk factors of healthy‐looking people. An important component of this assessment is screening tests. The screening test to be performed should be acceptable to persons. It is important for physicians to inform patients about the benefit / damage ratio related to the suggested PHE by the principles of interviewer model.

Özet

Periyodik Sağlık Muayenesi (PSM), sağlıklı görünen kişilerin yaş, cinsiyet ve risk faktörlerine görebelirlenen sıklıkta değerlendirilmesidir. Bu değerlendirmenin önemli bir bileşeni de tarama testleridir.Uygulanacak tarama testi kişiler tarafından kabul edilebilir olmalıdır. Hekimlerin önerilen PSM ile ilgiliyarar/zarar oranı hususunda, görüşmeci model prensipleri doğrultusunda hastaları bilgilendirmesiönemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜSTÜ, Y., DAĞCIOĞLU, B. F. (2022). How Should Counseling Be Done in Health Screenings?. Ankara Medical Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 199–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/441939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mazıcıoğlu M, Uzuner A. Aile Doktorları için Kurs Notları, 1.Aşama. Ankara: TC.Sağlık Bakanlığı; 2004:99‐109
  2. Kligman EW, Hale FA. Family Medicine: Principles and Practice. Taylor RB, ed. Family Medicine, Principles and Practice. 5th ed. New York: Springer‐Verlag; 1997:29‐52
  3. United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF): Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2019; https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/uspstf‐a‐and‐b‐ recommendations/. Erişim Tarihi: 03.03.2019
  4. Birtwhistle R, Bell N, Thombs B, Grad R, Dickinson J. Periodic preventive health visits: a more appropriate approach to delivering preventive services. Canadian Family Physician. 2017;63(11):824‐6
  5. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. https://canadiantaskforce.ca/guidelines/published‐guidelines/. Erişim Tarihi: 03.03.2019
  6. Summary of Recommendations for Clinical Preventive Services. 2017; https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/clinical_recommendations/cps‐ recommendations.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 05.03.2019
  7. Viera A, Power D. Koruma ve Taramaya Genel Bakış. Sloane PD, ed. (Palandüz A.çev.) Aile Hekimliğinin Esasları. 6. ed. İstanbul: Medikal Sağlık ve Yayıncılık; 2015:29‐35
  8. Warner EA, Herold AH. Interpreting Laboratory Tests. Rakel RE, ed. Textbook of Family Practice. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2016:157‐80
  9. Galen RS, Gambino SR. Beyond normality: The Predictive Value and Efficacy of Medical Diagnosis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1975:171‐5
  10. Duane M, Mishori R. Sağlam Erişkin Bakımı. Sloane PD, ed. (Palandüz A.çev.) Aile Hekimliğinin Esasları. 6. ed. İstanbul: Medikal Sağlık ve Yayıncılık; 2015:61‐75
  11. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):727‐37, W237‐42
  12. Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al. Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;151(10):738‐47
  13. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, DL M. Cumulative probability of false‐positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):481‐92
  14. Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, Cummings SR. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors