Journals / Ankara Law Review / 2012 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

HOW INFLUENTIAL ARE THE STANDARDS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE TURKISH CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM IN BANNING POLITICAL PARTIES?

Pages
17–27
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article will examine the changing approach of the TCC on the"letter of banning political parties which violate the principle of "indivisibleinfinity of the State with its territory and nation which is one of theeemtitutiona! and statutory grounds for dissolution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The European Convention on Human Rights (Convention) affects the"which constitutional system through two distinct paths.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Turkish Constitutional Court (TCC) also enjoins.! domestic law from--conflicting with the Convention and the ECHR rulings,:.-' "» ta Article 90 of the Constitution that gives international human rightscuts priority over statutory norms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article will examine the changing approach of the TCC on the"letter of banning political parties which violate the principle of "indivisibleinfinity of the State with its territory and nation which is one of theeemtitutiona! and statutory grounds for dissolution.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights (Convention) affects the"which constitutional system through two distinct paths. First, some of theconstitutional provisions are rooted in the Convention. Second, the Conventionand the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) guide the interpretation ofdomestic law in courts. The Turkish Constitutional Court (TCC) also enjoins.! domestic law from--conflicting with the Convention and the ECHR rulings,:.-' "» ta Article 90 of the Constitution that gives international human rightscuts priority over statutory norms. However, the CC generally uses the"es ofthe Convention for the interpretation of the characteristics of thejustify its narrow approach concerning rights and freedoms. Casesing the dissolution ofpolitical parties may be given as good examples toto the TCC 's relatively closed viewpoint. An oppposing current is seen in-' ,:' political process in which recent constitutional amendments follow the EUdardı and ongoing ECHR rulings that have been decided against Turkey-' made some changes in the TCC 's established perpective on politicalparties. This article will examine the changing approach of the TCC on the"letter of banning political parties which violate the principle of "indivisibleinfinity of the State with its territory and nation which is one of theeemtitutiona! and statutory grounds for dissolution.

🔖

Cite This Article

ESEN, S. (2022). HOW INFLUENTIAL ARE THE STANDARDS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE TURKISH CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM IN BANNING POLITICAL PARTIES?. Ankara Law Review, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 17–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/441652

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aslan, Zühtü, Conjlicting Paradigms: Political Rights in the Turkish 'onstitutional Court, 11 CRITICAL MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES 11 (2002). llarcz, Mercedes Iglesias, La prohibicio'n de los partidos politic en Francia, Alemania Espafia, REVISTA DEL CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES JURI'DICAS ım LA FACULTAD LIBRE DE DERECHO DE MONTERREY 154 (2009).
  2. Başlar, Kemal, TÜRK MAHKEME KARARLARINDA AVRUPA İNSAN HAKLARI SÖZLEŞMESI (Avrupa Konseyi Türkiye Temsilciliği Yayını, 2008). l--lcharri Casi, Fermin Javier, DISOLUCIÖN SUSPENSION JUDICIAL DE I'ARTIDOS POLITICOS (Dykinson, 2003): (iönenç, Levent, The 2001 Amendments to the 1982
  3. Constitution of Turkey, ANKARA LAW REVIEW 89 (2004). (iönenç, Levent, and Selin Esen, The Problem of Less Protective International x'lgreements in Domestic Legal Systems: Article 90 of the Turkish Constitution, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW REFORM 487 (2006).
  4. Kaboğlu, İbrahim Ö., ÖZGÜRLÜKLER HUKUKU (İmge Kitabevi, 2002).
  5. Kaboğlu, İbrahim Ö., DEĞIŞIKLIKLER IŞIĞINDA 1982 ANAYASASI HALK NEYI )YLAYACAK (Imge, 2010).
  6. Kogacioğlu, Dicle, Dissolution of Political Parties by the Constitutional Court in Turkey: Judicial Delimitation of Political Domain, 18 INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY 265 (2003). )den, Merih, ANAYASA HUKUKUNDA SIYASI PARTILERIN ANAYASAYA AYKIRI EYLEMLERI NEDENIYLE KAPATILMALARI (Yetkin Yayınlar, 2003).
  7. Özbudun, Ergun, Party Prohibition Cases: Diflerent Approaches by the Turkish 'onstitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights, 17 DEMOGRATIZATION 128 (2010).
  8. Virgala Foruria, Eduardo, La ST de 27 de marzo de 2003 de illegalizacién de "ulusuna: el estado de derecho penetra en Euskadi, 12-13 TEORİA REALIDAD ('t )NS'I'I'I'IK 'ıONAL 620 (2003).