SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Barosu Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 3 *dublicate*-18281

A CRITICAL APPROACH TO THE VERDICT OF SUPREME COURT ASSEMBLY OF CIVIL CHAMBERS THAT DATED 22.3.2017, BASIS NO 2017/4-1334 AND VERDİCT NO 2017/545

Yargıtay Hukuk Genel Kurulu'nun 22.3.2017 Tarih, 2017/4-1334 Esas ve 2017/545 Karar Sayılı Kararı Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Yaklaşım

Hatice Tolunay OZANEMRE YAYLA
Bilge ÖZTAN
Pages
197–225
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In a verdict of the Supreme Court Assembly of Civil Chambers (dated22.3.2017, 2017/4-1334 B. and 2017/545 V.), it was finalised that third personwho had sexual intercourse with a married person requires to pay compensationto the spouse who is damaged due to the violation of the duty of loyaltyon several grounds.In this paper where there is such a framework, the legal grounds in relatedverdicts of the Supreme Court will be examined to be able to clarify the legalobligations of the spouse violating the duty of loyalty and third person in caseof the violation of the duty of loyalty.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In case one of the spouses violates the "duty of loyalty" that is one of the dutiesto be caused by the union of marriage, if the other spouse has the right to suethe third person having affair with the spouse, and the liabilities of either thespouse violating the duty or the third person on account of the violation of theduty of loyalty have been far from uniformity in the verdicts of the SupremeCourt.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In case one of the spouses violates the "duty of loyalty" that is one of the dutiesto be caused by the union of marriage, if the other spouse has the right to suethe third person having affair with the spouse, and the liabilities of either thespouse violating the duty or the third person on account of the violation of theduty of loyalty have been far from uniformity in the verdicts of the SupremeCourt.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In a verdict of the Supreme Court Assembly of Civil Chambers (dated22.3.2017, 2017/4-1334 B. and 2017/545 V.), it was finalised that third personwho had sexual intercourse with a married person requires to pay compensationto the spouse who is damaged due to the violation of the duty of loyaltyon several grounds.In this paper where there is such a framework, the legal grounds in relatedverdicts of the Supreme Court will be examined to be able to clarify the legalobligations of the spouse violating the duty of loyalty and third person in caseof the violation of the duty of loyalty.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In case one of the spouses violates the "duty of loyalty" that is one of the dutiesto be caused by the union of marriage, if the other spouse has the right to suethe third person having affair with the spouse, and the liabilities of either thespouse violating the duty or the third person on account of the violation of theduty of loyalty have been far from uniformity in the verdicts of the SupremeCourt. In a verdict of the Supreme Court Assembly of Civil Chambers (dated22.3.2017, 2017/4-1334 B. and 2017/545 V.), it was finalised that third personwho had sexual intercourse with a married person requires to pay compensationto the spouse who is damaged due to the violation of the duty of loyaltyon several grounds.In this paper where there is such a framework, the legal grounds in relatedverdicts of the Supreme Court will be examined to be able to clarify the legalobligations of the spouse violating the duty of loyalty and third person in caseof the violation of the duty of loyalty.

Özet

Eşlerden birinin evlilik birliğinin getirdiği yükümlülüklerden biri olan "sadakatyükümlülüğü"nü ihlâl etmesi hâlinde, diğer eşin, eşiyle birliktelik kurmuş olanüçüncü kişiye karşı tazminat dâvası açma hakkına sahip olup olmadığı ve buçerçevede, gerek yükümlülüğünü ihlâl eden eşin gerek üçüncü kişinin, sadakatyükümlülüğünün ihlâli nedeniyle zarar gören eşe karşı sorumlulukları özellikleYargıtay Kararları çerçevesinde yeknesak olmaktan uzaktır. Yargıtay, vermişolduğu bir Hukuk Genel Kurulu Kararı'nda (22.3.2017 t., 2017/4-1334 E. ve2017/545 K.), sadakat yükümlülüğünün ihlâlinde, evli kişiyle cinsel birliktelikyaşayan üçüncü kişinin, yükümlülüğün ihlâlinden zarar gören eşe tazminatödemesi gerektiğine çeşitli gerekçelerle karar vermiştir.Bu çerçevede çalışmada, ilgili Yargıtay Kararında yer alan hukuki dayanaklarınirdelenmesiyle, sadakat yükümlülüğünün ihlâlinde, yükümlülüğü ihlâl edeneş ile üçüncü kişinin hukuki açıdan sorumluluk durumları aydınlatılmayaçalışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAYLA, H. T. O., ÖZTAN, B. (2022). A CRITICAL APPROACH TO THE VERDICT OF SUPREME COURT ASSEMBLY OF CIVIL CHAMBERS THAT DATED 22.3.2017, BASIS NO 2017/4-1334 AND VERDİCT NO 2017/545. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 3 *dublicate*-18281, 197–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/440977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aebi-Müller, Regina E., Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht, Personen- und Familienrecht inkl. Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht Art. 1-456
  2. ZGB, Herausgeber: Peter Breitschmid, Alexandra Rumo-Jungo, 2. Auflage, Schulthess Verlag AG, Zürich-Basel-Genf 2012. Bräm, Verena: "Der Schutz der ehelichen Gemeinschaft: Besonderheiten, Tendenzen, Widersprüche", Fam.Pra. ch, Stämpfli Verlag, Heft 3, 2006, s. 519- 575. Bräm, Verena: Zürcher Kommentar, Bd. II/1c, Die Wirkungen der Ehe im allgemeinen, Art. 159-180 Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Das Familienrecht, 1. Abteilung: Das Eherecht (Art. 90-251 ZGB), 4. Auflage, Schulthess Verlag AG, Zürich 1998.
  3. Brehm, Roland: Berner Kommentar, Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, Das Obligationenrecht, Die Entstehung durch unerlaubte Handlungen, Art. 41-61
  4. OR, Herausgeber: Heinz Hausheer, Hans Peter Walter, 4. Auflage, Stämpfli Verlag AG, Bern 2013.
  5. Brückner, Christian: Das Personenrecht des ZGB, Stämpfli Verlag AG, ZürichBasel-Genf 2000.
  6. Bucher, Andreas: Natürliche Personen und Persönlichkeitsschutz, 3. Auflage, Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, Basel-Genf-München 1999.
  7. Dural, Mustafa/Öğüz, Tufan: Türk Özel Hukuku Cilt II, Kişiler Hukuku, İstanbul 2016.
  8. Dural, Mustafa/Öğüz,Tufan/Gümüş, M. Alper: Türk Özel Hukuku Cilt III, Aile Hukuku, 4.Bası, Filiz Kitabevi Yayınları, İstanbul 2011.
  9. Eren, Fikret: Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 17. Bası, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara 2017.
  10. Fankhauser, Roland/Guillod, Sarah: Kurzkommentar Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, Herausgeber: Andrea Büchler, Dominique Jakob, Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, Basel-Genf-München 2011.
  11. Hatemi, Hüseyin/Gökyayla, Emre: Borçlar Hukuku, Genel Bölüm, 3. Bası, Vedat Kitapçılık Yayınları, İstanbul 2015.
  12. Hausheer, Heinz/Aebi-Müller, Regina, E.: Das Personenrecht des Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuches, 3. Auflage, Stämpfli Verlag AG, Bern 2012.
  13. Hausheer, Heinz/Reusser, Ruth/Geiser, Thomas: Berner Kommentar, Die Wirkungen der Ehe im Allgemeinen, Art. 159-180
  14. ZGB, Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch, Das Familienrecht, Das Eherech, Herausgeber: Heinz Hausheer, Stämpfli Verlag AG, Bern 1999.
  15. Heberlein, Adrian/Bräm, Verena: Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht, Personen- und Familienrecht inkl. Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht Art. 1-456
  16. ZGB, Herausgeber: Peter Breitschmid, Alexandra Rumo-Jungo, 2. Auflage, Schulthess Verlag AG, Zürich-Basel-Genf 2012.
  17. Hegnauer, Cyril/Breitschmid, Peter: Grundriss des Eherechts, 4. Auflage, Stämpfli Verlag AG, Bern 2000.
  18. Helvacı, Serap: