Journals / Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

AB Sosyal İçerme Politikası Uygulamalarının Türkiye'deki Maliyet-Fayda Tahlili

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF EU SOCIAL INCLUSION POLICY IMPLEMENTATIONS IN TURKEY

Pages
125–145
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The policy approach suggested by Graziano that evaluates policies with four key dimensions: "objectives, principles, procedures and instruments is applied to the analysis of EU and Turkish social inclusion policy implementations".1

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Welfare regime is composed of social and economic policies that are adopted to protect and promote the economic and social well-being of its citizens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While neoliberal principles extend through globalization, welfare regimes have been suffering from these spreading principles focusing on individual empowerment and equality of opportunity rather than collective security and shared welfare.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The policy approach suggested by Graziano that evaluates policies with four key dimensions: "objectives, principles, procedures and instruments is applied to the analysis of EU and Turkish social inclusion policy implementations".1
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Welfare regime is composed of social and economic policies that are adopted to protect and promote the economic and social well-being of its citizens. While neoliberal principles extend through globalization, welfare regimes have been suffering from these spreading principles focusing on individual empowerment and equality of opportunity rather than collective security and shared welfare. This perception has widened the inequalities in the society between empowered and weakened individuals and the urgent need to call back the 'social justice' becomes sino qua non. This is the base of how the concept of social inclusion and social risk management policies has emerged. This article analyzes ways of the reflection of this basis from EU to Turkey and its possible benefits/costs and advantages/disadvantages for Turkish social policy development. The policy approach suggested by Graziano that evaluates policies with four key dimensions: "objectives, principles, procedures and instruments is applied to the analysis of EU and Turkish social inclusion policy implementations".1

Özet

Refah rejimleri vatandaşların sosyal ve ekonomik menfaatlerini korumak ve geliştirmek için yürütülen sosyal ve ekonomik politikalardan oluşur. Küreselleşmenin yarattığı ivme ile neoliberal politikalar yaygınlaştıkça refah rejimleri; sosyal durum güvenliği, toplu ve paylaşılan refah kavramları yerine bireysel güçlenme ve fırsat eşitliği kavramlarına odaklanan bu neoliberal prensiplerden olumsuz etkilenmektedir. Algıdaki bu değişiklik toplumda eşitsizliği derinleştirerek güçlendirilen ve zayıflaştırılan bireyler arasında uçurum yaratmış, 'sosyal adalet' kavramının geri çağırılma ihtiyacını zorunlu hale getirmiştir. Bu durum sosyal içerme kavramının ve sosyal risk yönetimi politikalarının temelinin nasıl oluştuğunu gözler önüne sermektedir. Bu makale, söz konusu temelin AB yoluyla Türkiye'ye yansıma yolları ve Türkiye'de sosyal politikanın gelişiminde olası fayda/maliyeti veya avantaj/dezavantajlarını tartışmaktadır. AB ve Türkiye'nin sosyal içerme politikalarının analizinde Graziano'nun siyasaları: "hedefler, prensipler, prosedürler ve araçlar olmak üzere 4 temel boyutta değerlendiren teorik bakış açısı"2 kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİLİZ, B. (2022). AB Sosyal İçerme Politikası Uygulamalarının Türkiye'deki Maliyet-Fayda Tahlili. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 125–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/440939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Bailey, D.J (2008). Explaining the Underdevelopment of 'Social Europe': A Critical Realization. Journal of European Social Policy, vol.18(3): 232-245 doi: 10.1177/0958928708091057 Bianet (21.04.2010). SHÇEK Çocuğu Değil Aileyi Koruyor. Available at: http://www.bianet.org/bianet/toplum/121471-shcek-cocugu-degil-aileyi- koruyor Blanchard, J.O. (2004). Explaining European Unemployment. The National Bureau of Economic Researh. Research Summary. Summer 2004. Available at:http://www.nber.org/reporter/summer04/blanchard.html
  2. Bora, A. (2007). 'Yoksulluk ve Kadınlar' Atılgan, G. & Çakar,B.Y. (Edt). Yoksulluk ve Dışlanma. Teş-İş Dergisi, Haziran 2007
  3. Buğra, A. & Keyder, Ç. (2005) Poverty and Social Policy in Contemporary Turkey. Report of Bogazici University, Social Policy Forum. Available at: http://www.spf.boun.edu.tr/docs/WP-Bugra-Keyder.pdf
  4. Buğra, A. (2007).
  5. Yoksulluk ve Sosyal Haklar. Atılgan, G. & Çakar,B.Y. (Edt). Yoksulluk ve Dışlanma. Teş-İş Dergisi, Haziran 2007 Bulletin of Statistics of Social Expenditures (2012). Directorate General of Social Assistance and Solidarity. Available at: http://www.sosyalyardimlar.gov.tr/upload/Node/11873/files/SYGM_2012.pdf
  6. CEC (2013). 2013 Regular Report on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession, Brussels. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2013/package/tr_rapport_ 2013.pdf CEC (2004). 2004 Regular Report on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession, Brussels. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2004/rr_tr_2004_ en.pdf Commission (2008). Commission Recommendation of 3 October 2008 on the active inclusion of people excluded from the labour market.L 307, 18/11/2008. Available at: http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:307:0011:01:EN:HT ML Council (1974). Council Resolution of 21 January 1974 concerning a social action programme OJ C 13, 12.2.1974.available at:http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31974Y0212(01):en:N OT Council (1989). Resolution of the Council and of the Ministries for Social Affairs Meeting within the Council on C 277/01, available at:http://eur- lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:1989:277:0001:0001:EN:P DF Council (2000). Presidency Conclusions of Lisbon Council. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100- r1.en0.htm Council (2001). Objectives in the Fight Against Poverty and Social Exclusion. C 82/02. Available at: http://eur- lex.europa.eu/Lex