This is a comprehensive evaluation of the 1:5000 Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development Plan andthe 1:1000 Conservation Implementation Plans, which have become a matter of litigation against the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality,filed by various non-governmental organizations, universities, the Union of Chambers of Turkish Architects and Engineers (TMMOB) andpublic institutions; in terms of the environment, transportation and trafic as regards the entirety of the planned location, and the integrityof the plan, based on conservation-reclamation planning essentials and public interest.Tus the Ulus Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development and Implementation Plan and Plan Notesas ratified by the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and Conservation Board, are examined in this context in terms of restoration site,protected site, conservation site, interaction and transition sites and historic and cultural properties.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This is a comprehensive evaluation of the 1:5000 Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development Plan andthe 1:1000 Conservation Implementation Plans, which have become a matter of litigation against the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality,filed by various non-governmental organizations, universities, the Union of Chambers of Turkish Architects and Engineers (TMMOB) andpublic institutions; in terms of the environment, transportation and trafic as regards the entirety of the planned location, and the integrityof the plan, based on conservation-reclamation planning essentials and public interest.Tus the Ulus Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development and Implementation Plan and Plan Notesas ratified by the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and Conservation Board, are examined in this context in terms of restoration site,protected site, conservation site, interaction and transition sites and historic and cultural properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This is a comprehensive evaluation of the 1:5000 Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development Plan andthe 1:1000 Conservation Implementation Plans, which have become a matter of litigation against the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality,filed by various non-governmental organizations, universities, the Union of Chambers of Turkish Architects and Engineers (TMMOB) andpublic institutions; in terms of the environment, transportation and trafic as regards the entirety of the planned location, and the integrityof the plan, based on conservation-reclamation planning essentials and public interest.Tus the Ulus Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development and Implementation Plan and Plan Notesas ratified by the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and Conservation Board, are examined in this context in terms of restoration site,protected site, conservation site, interaction and transition sites and historic and cultural properties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This is a comprehensive evaluation of the 1:5000 Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development Plan andthe 1:1000 Conservation Implementation Plans, which have become a matter of litigation against the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality,filed by various non-governmental organizations, universities, the Union of Chambers of Turkish Architects and Engineers (TMMOB) andpublic institutions; in terms of the environment, transportation and trafic as regards the entirety of the planned location, and the integrityof the plan, based on conservation-reclamation planning essentials and public interest.Tus the Ulus Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development and Implementation Plan and Plan Notesas ratified by the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and Conservation Board, are examined in this context in terms of restoration site,protected site, conservation site, interaction and transition sites and historic and cultural properties.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
This is a comprehensive evaluation of the 1:5000 Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development Plan andthe 1:1000 Conservation Implementation Plans, which have become a matter of litigation against the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality,filed by various non-governmental organizations, universities, the Union of Chambers of Turkish Architects and Engineers (TMMOB) andpublic institutions; in terms of the environment, transportation and trafic as regards the entirety of the planned location, and the integrityof the plan, based on conservation-reclamation planning essentials and public interest.Tus the Ulus Ankara Historic City Centre Restoration Site Conservation Master Development and Implementation Plan and Plan Notesas ratified by the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and Conservation Board, are examined in this context in terms of restoration site,protected site, conservation site, interaction and transition sites and historic and cultural properties.
Özet
Bu çalışmada, çeşitli sivil toplum kuruluşları, üniversiteler, Türk Mühendis ve Mimar Odaları Birliğine (TMMOB) bağlı meslek odalarıile kamu kurum ve kuruluşları tarafından Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Başkanlığına karşı açılan davalarda uyuşmazlık konusu edilenAnkara Tarihi Kent Merkezi Yenileme Alanı 1/5000 Ölçekli Koruma Amaçlı Nazım İmar Planı ve 1/1000 Ölçekli Koruma AmaçlıUygulama İmar Planları ile planlanan yörenin tümünün çevre, ulaşım ve trafik gibi ilişkileri; plan bütünlüğü bağlamında kapsamlı birbiçimde ele alınarak, koruma-ıslah planlaması esasları ve kamu yararı açısından değerlendirilmiştir.Bu bağlamda; Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi ve Koruma Kurulu kararıyla onaylanan Ulus Tarihi Kent Merkezi Koruma Amaçlı Nazımve Uygulama İmar Planı ve Plan Notları; yenileme alanı, sit alanı, koruma alanı, etkileşim ve geçiş alanı ve tarihi ve kültürel taşınmazvarlıklar gibi hususlar açısından irdelenmiştir.
🔖
Cite This Article
TUNÇER, M. (2022). Ankara historic city centre restoration site conservation plan, its characteristics, and rationales for its revocation. Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 10–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/440880
Cilt I. (1975). İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları. Ankara 10. İdare Mahkemesi, E: 2007/885, K: 2008/2258, (23.07.2008). Ankara 4. İdare Mahkemesi. Bilirkişi raporu, Dosya no: 2007/1411. Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Başkanlığı Hukuk Müşavirliği, Sayı: 2007/1411 E [Dava Dosyası]. Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Meclisi. Karar no: 33, (15.01.1990).
Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Meclisi, Karar no: 210, (14.01.2005). Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Meclisi. Karar no: 1619. (15.06.2007).
Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Meclisi, Karar no: 1964, (15.07.2005). Ankara Büyükşehir Belediye Meclisi. Karar no: 2127, (17.08.2007). Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2008a). Ankara Tarihi Kent Merkezi Yenileme Alanı Koruma Amaçlı Uygulama İmar Planı. Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi. (2008b). Ankara Tarihi Kent Merkezi Koruma Amaçlı Yenileme Alanı Koruma Amaçlı İmar Planı Raporu. Ankara Büyükşehir Belediyesi İmar ve Bayındırlık Komisyon Raporu, Sayı: 589. (17.08.2007). Ankara Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Bölge Kurulu. Karar no: 1111, (09.12.2005). Ankara Tarihi Kent Merkezi Yenileme Alanı [Uydu görüntüsü]. (2013). 5 Kasım 2013 tarihinde https://maps.google.com/ adresinden erişildi. Ankara Yenileme Alanı Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Bölge Kurulu. Karar no: 25, (17.05.2007).
Avrupa Mimari Miras Tüzüğü. (1975). (Çev.: M. Erdil). 10 Eylül 2013 tarihinde http://www.kumid.net/euproject/ admin/userfiles/dokumanlar/K-Avrupa-Mimari-Miras- Tuzu%C4%9Fu,-COE,-1975.pdf adresinden erişildi. Bakanlar Kurulu Kararı, Karar tarihi: 08.08.2005, Karar sayısı: 2005/9289. (07.09.2005). T.C. Resmî Gazete, Sayı: 25929. Ankara: Başbakanlık Mevzuatı Geliştirme ve Yayın Genel Müdürlüğü. Bilirkişi raporu (1952). Mimarlık Dergisi, (5-6), 29-40. DOCOMOMO Türkiye Ulusal Çalışma Grubu. (2005). [Basın Açıklaması]. Dünya Kültürel ve Doğal Mirasını Koruma Konvansiyonu. (1972). 10 Eylül 2013 tarihinde http://tefis.kulturturizm.gov.tr/ TR,14269/dunya-kulturel-ve-dogal-mirasin-korunmasi- sozlesmesi.html adresinden erişildi. Göksu, E. ve Özkut, D. (17 Mayıs 2007). Muhalefet Şerh Raporu. Ankara 4. İdare Mahkemesi Bilirkişi Raporu, Dosya No 2007/1411. Günay, B. (t.y.). 1/1000 Ölçekli Ulus Tarihi Kent Merkezi Koruma Islah İmar Planına ilişkin açıklamalar. 18 Eylül 2013 tari- hinde http://www.arkitera.com/v1/gundem/ulus/yazi3.htm adresinden erişildi. ICOMOS. (1987). Tarihi Kentlerin ve Kentsel Alanların Korunması Tüzüğü. 18 Eylül 2013 tarihinde http://www.icomos. org.tr/Dosyalar/ICOMOSTR_088465000