SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

İdeoloji ve politikanın mekânsal gösterimi: Keçiören örneği

Spatial Representations of Ideology and politics in Urban Scene: Keçiören Example

İrem ÖZ
Pages
131–158
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

What has been tried to be analyzed in this study is the emergence of a new architecturalstyle that imitates the past with a modern approach not only in terms of urban and architectural quality but also from social and politicalmotives that are embedded in the culture by using Pierre Bourdieu s sociological notions as elements of interpretation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Being the capital city of a newly established Turkish Republic that was descended from the Ottoman Empire, Ankara was attributed amassive symbolic meaning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, Keçiören District, being one of the largest and most populated districts of Ankarahas undergone a massive transformation afer 1994 with the change in the political structure.Te aim of this study is to make an analysis of the transformation that has been taking place in Keçiören district of Ankara since 1994,focusing on the architecture of AKP government that has been taking place not only in the architectural or urban field but also in thepolitical, social, economic and cultural fields.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:What has been tried to be analyzed in this study is the emergence of a new architecturalstyle that imitates the past with a modern approach not only in terms of urban and architectural quality but also from social and politicalmotives that are embedded in the culture by using Pierre Bourdieu s sociological notions as elements of interpretation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Being the capital city of a newly established Turkish Republic that was descended from the Ottoman Empire, Ankara was attributed amassive symbolic meaning. Ankara became the representative of a new Turkish State that aimed to attain a place in the global picture asbeing a modern and secular nation state. It carries a distinct characteristic as the refections of transformations taking place in the politicalsphere can be read from the urban space. In this context, Keçiören District, being one of the largest and most populated districts of Ankarahas undergone a massive transformation afer 1994 with the change in the political structure.Te aim of this study is to make an analysis of the transformation that has been taking place in Keçiören district of Ankara since 1994,focusing on the architecture of AKP government that has been taking place not only in the architectural or urban field but also in thepolitical, social, economic and cultural fields. What has been tried to be analyzed in this study is the emergence of a new architecturalstyle that imitates the past with a modern approach not only in terms of urban and architectural quality but also from social and politicalmotives that are embedded in the culture by using Pierre Bourdieu s sociological notions as elements of interpretation.

Özet

Osmanlı Dönemini takiben kurulmuş olan Türkiye Cumhuriyetinin başkenti olan Ankaraya bu bağlamda önemli sembolik anlamlaryüklenmiştir. Modern Türk Cumhuriyetinin temsili olan Ankara kenti, modern ve laik bir devlet olarak küresel tabloda yer edinmeyiamaçlamıştır. Diğer şehirlerden farklı olarak, siyasi alanın merkezinde olması sebebiyle, siyasi alanda olan dönüşümleri mekânüzerinden okumak mümkündür. Bu bağlamda, Ankaranın en büyük ve nüfusu en fazla olan ilçelerinden Keçiören 1994 yılı sonrasısiyasi sahada olan dönüşümler sonucunda tamamen değişmiştir.Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ankaranın Keçiören ilçesinde 1994 yılı sonrası başlayan ve hâlâ devam eden dönüşümü incelemektir. AK Partimimarisinin üzerinde durularak bu dönüşümün etrafında sosyal, politik, kültürel ve ekonomik sahalarda meydana gelen değişimlerincelenecektir. Bu çalışma ile amaçlanan, geçmişi sadece fiziksel olarak değil, bunlar ile iç içe geçmiş sosyal ve siyasi olarak dabenimsemiş yeni bir mimari oluşumun incelemesini Pierre Bourdieunun sosyolojik kavramları ile yapmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ, İ. (2022). İdeoloji ve politikanın mekânsal gösterimi: Keçiören örneği. Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 131–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/440869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Akın, E. (2007). Kentsel gelişme ve kentsel rantlar: Ankara örneği. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara University Social Sciences Institution, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Ankara. Alanya Kalesi. (n.d.). Antalya il Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from http://www. antalyakulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,67819/alanya-kalesi.htm Allen, D. E. and Anderson, P. F. (1994). Consumption and social stratification: Bourdieu’s distinction. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 70-74. Ankara University Social Sciences Institution, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Ankara.
  2. Arslan, R. (1989). Gecekondulaşmanın evrimi. Mimarlık, 27(238), 34-37.
  3. Aslanoğlu, İ. (2010). Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi mimarlığı. İstanbul:
  4. Bilge Kültür Sanat. Ataöv, A. and Osmay, S. (2007). Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşüme yöntemsel bir yaklaşım. METU JFA, 24(2), 57-82.
  5. Aydın, Ö., Bayraktar, N. and Tekkaya, E. (2003). Cumhuriyet ilçesinde aykırı bir ilçe: Keçiören. Mimarlık, 307, 56-59.
  6. Baştuğ, S. (1979). Urban growth and cultural change: two squatter settlements in Ankara.
  7. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  8. Batur, A. (2005). A concise history: Architecture in Turkey during the 20 th century. Ankara: Chamber of Architects of Turkey. Birol, İ. and Derman, Ç. (1991). Motifes in Turkish decorative arts. İstanbul: Kubbealtı Akademisi Kültür ve San’at Vakfı. Bloom, J. and Blair, S. S. (2009). Te grove encyclopedia of Islamic art and architure (Vol. 3). New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Blunden, A. (2004). Bourdieu on status, class and culture. Retrieved 20.03.2014, from http://home.pacific.net.au/~andy/works/
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge Harvard University Press.
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Te forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey (Ed.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 46-58). New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Teory, 7(1), 14-25.
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1990). Te logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1992). On symbolic power. In J. B. Tompson (Ed.), Language and symbolic power (pp. 163-170). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1996). Vilhelm Aubert memorial lecture: Physical space, social space and habitus. Paper presented at the Oslo, Department of Sociology, University of Oslo and Institu