SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Probable Contributions of Structuring Activities of the Government-University and Industry Partnership (GUIP) to the Development of Turkish Industry

Kamu-Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Yapılanma Çalışmalarının Türkiye Sanayisinin Gelişimine Olası Katkıları

Ömer ARSLAN
Pages
823–849
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While analysing the contributions, structures of regions with different industrialization levels were considered and how to benefit from the regions within optimal output context for the purpose of achieving targets of the country was handled

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research is about the Government-University-Industry Partnership (GUIP) Work Group, GUIP City Planning and Development Committee and Council of Higher Education Permanent Committee which were designed and established by the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology (MSIT) to achieve Government-University-Industry Partnership throughout the country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides, its probable contributions to producing intermediate goods of manufacturing industry, which according to 2012 import data cost 150 billion dollars that year, in the country were handled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While analysing the contributions, structures of regions with different industrialization levels were considered and how to benefit from the regions within optimal output context for the purpose of achieving targets of the country was handled
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research is about the Government-University-Industry Partnership (GUIP) Work Group, GUIP City Planning and Development Committee and Council of Higher Education Permanent Committee which were designed and established by the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology (MSIT) to achieve Government-University-Industry Partnership throughout the country. Probable effects of this public policy, which was identified for the first time within Turkish policy framework, on a sustainable independent industrialization based on R&D and innovation and able to produce added value, were discussed. Besides, its probable contributions to producing intermediate goods of manufacturing industry, which according to 2012 import data cost 150 billion dollars that year, in the country were handled. While analysing the contributions, structures of regions with different industrialization levels were considered and how to benefit from the regions within optimal output context for the purpose of achieving targets of the country was handled

Özet

Bu çalışma Bilim, Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı'nın (BSTB) Türkiye'de Kamu-Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği'nin (KÜSİ) etkin biçimde gerçekleşmesini sağlayabilmek için oluşturduğu KÜSİ Çalışma Grubu, KÜSİ İl Planlama ve Geliştirme Kurulu ve YÖK KÜSİ Daimi Komisyonu hakkında yapılmış bir araştırmadır. Bu çalışmada Türk kamu politikası bağlamında ilk kez kurumsal bir kimliğe kavuşan bu yapının ülkenin sürdürülebilir, teknolojik dışa bağımlılığı azaltan, inovasyon ve Ar-Ge'ye dayalı ve katma değer üreten bir sanayi gelişimine olası etkileri ve 2012 ithalat verilerine göre yıllık 150 milyar dolarlık tutarı bulan imalat sektöründeki ara malların ülke içinde üretilmesi çabalarına olası katkıları ele alınmıştır. Katkılar analiz edilirken farklı sanayileşme seviyesine sahip bölgelerin yapısı göz önüne alınarak ülkenin hedeflerini gerçekleştirebilmek için bölgelerden optimal çıktılar bağlamında nasıl yararlanılabileceği ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, Ö. (2022). Probable Contributions of Structuring Activities of the Government-University and Industry Partnership (GUIP) to the Development of Turkish Industry. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 823–849. https://ajindex.com/articles/440228

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arslan, Ö. (2017).
  2. Kamu, Üniversite ve Sanayi İşbirliğinin Doğu Anadolu Bölgesinin Sanayi Gelişimine Katkıları Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Uluslararası Hakemli Ekonomi Yönetimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11, 54-77. doi: 10.17373/UHEYAD.2017.1.0002 BSTB (2015). Verimlilik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (2015-2018). Ankara:
  3. T.C. Bilim, Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. BSTB (2015). Türkiye Sanayi Stratejisi Belgesi (2015-2018). Ankara:
  4. T.C. Bilim, Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. BSTB (2015). Türkiye Kamu-Üniversite-Sanayi Stratejisi Belgesi (2015-2018). Ankara:
  5. T.C. Bilim, Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. Companies House (2016). Register a private limited company online. (Erişim: 02.09.2016), https://www.gov.uk/register-a-company-online
  6. Donges, J. B. (1980). Industrial Policies in West Germany’s Not-So-Market-Oriented Economy. The World Economy, 3 (2), 185-204.
  7. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.
  8. Feller, I. (2009). Industry-University R&D Partnerships in the United States. 21 st Century Inovation Systems for Japan and USA, (Ed.) Nagaoka, S., Kondo, M., Flamm, K. & Wessner, C., (pp.169-185).
  9. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
  10. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance. London: Pinter Publishers.
  11. Kiper, M. (2010). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği ve Bu Kapsamda Üniversite-Sanayi Ortak Araştırma Merkezleri Programı (ÜSAMP). Ankara: Türkiye Teknoloji Geliştirme Vakfı. Kniivilä, M. (2007). Industrial development and economic growth: Implications for poverty reduction and income Inequality. Industrial Development for the 21st Century: Sustainable Development Perspectives (p 295-332),
  12. UN, New York. Kondo, M. (2009). University-Industry Partnerships in Japan. 21 st Century Inovation Systems for Japan and USA. (Ed.) Nagaoka, S., Kondo, M., Flamm, K. & Wessner, C., (pp. 186-205).
  13. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
  14. Lundvall, B. (Ed.), (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Frances Pinter. Motoyama, Y. (2014). Long-term collaboration between university and industry: A case study of nanotechnology development in Japan. Technology in Society, 36, 39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.09.001 Nagaoka, S., & Flamm, K. (2009). The Chrysanthemum Meets the Eagle: The Coevolution of Innovation Policies in Japan and the