Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The Affective Domains in L2 Writing Research in Terms of Causality and Correlation: A Scoping Review

İkinci Dil Yazım Araştırmalarında Nedensellik ve Korelasyon Bakımından Duygusal Alanlar: Bir Kapsam İncelemesi*

Pages
147–162
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that relevant research focused on writing anxiety and tended to ignore other affective variables The studies often used quantitative research designs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This scoping review aimed at reviewing the research into the affective issues in L2 writing in terms of causality and correlation and to find out any gaps for further studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Correlational studies concluded that there is a negative correlation between the impact of these affective variables, writing performance and process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that relevant research focused on writing anxiety and tended to ignore other affective variables The studies often used quantitative research designs.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This scoping review aimed at reviewing the research into the affective issues in L2 writing in terms of causality and correlation and to find out any gaps for further studies. Scoping reviews are recognized as useful studies for meta-analyses since they display value and inadequacy in a research theme. Results showed that relevant research focused on writing anxiety and tended to ignore other affective variables The studies often used quantitative research designs. Causal and correlational research supports that affective constraints negatively affect writing achievement. Correlational studies concluded that there is a negative correlation between the impact of these affective variables, writing performance and process. The need of piloting, different and larger participant groups was also highlighted.

Özet

Bu kapsam incelemesi, ikinci dil yazım sürecindeki psikolojik unsurları nedensellik ve korelasyonadayanan yayınlanmış araştırmalar bakımından incelemek ve yeni çalışmalar için eksik noktalarıbulmayı amaçlamıştır. Kapsam incelemeleri, meta-analiz çalışmaları için son derece yararlıkaynaklar olarak bilinir ve ilgili araştırma konusunun değeri ve eksik yönlerini gösterir. İlgiliaraştırmalar yazma kaygısına yoğunlaşmakla birlikte çalışmaların diğer psikolojik değişkenleri gözardı etme eğiliminde olduklarını göstermiştir. Bu çalışmalar çoğunlukla nicel araştırma metodukullanmıştır. Nedenselliğe ve korelasyona dayanan çalışmalar, psikolojik güçlüklerin ikinci dildeyazım başarısı ve performansı olumsuz yönde etkilediğini desteklemektedir. Korelasyon çalışmalarıda aynı doğrultuda bu psikolojik değişkenlerin etkisi ile yazma başarısı ve süreci konusunda negatifyönlü bir ilişkiden bahsetmektedir. Ayrıca sonuçlar, araştırmalarda pilot çalışma, farklı türdekatılımcı grubu ve daha çok katılımcı ihtiyacını vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAĞIZ, O., BÜYÜKKANTARCIOĞLU, N., YİĞİTER, K. (2022). The Affective Domains in L2 Writing Research in Terms of Causality and Correlation: A Scoping Review. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 147–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/439909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Aida, Y. (1994).
  2. Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope’s construct of foreign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. Modern Language Journal, 78, 155–168. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02026.x Alrabai, F. (2015). The influence of teachers' anxiety-reducing strategies on learners' foreign language anxiety. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 163-190. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2014.890203 Anderson, S., Allen, P., Peckham, S., & Goodwin, N. (2008). Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organization and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(1), 7. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
  3. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616 Boice, R. (1985). Cognitive components of blocking. Written Communication, 2(1), 91-104. DOI: 10.1177/0741088385002001006 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic Reviews: CRD's Advice for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2008.) Retrieved from https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.p df Cheng, Y. S., Horwitz, E. K., & Schallert, D. L. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417-446. DOI: 10.1111/0023-8333.00095 Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O'Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L.,. & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291-1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013 Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(3), 242-249. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40170632
  4. Derrick, D. J. (2016). Instrument reporting practices in second language research. TESOL Quarterly, 50, 132–153. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.217 Ehrich, K., Freeman, G. K., Richards, S. C., Robinson, I. C., & Shepperd, S. (2002). How to do a scoping exercise: continuity of care. Research, Policy, and Planning, 20(1), 25-29. Retrieved from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/33560
  5. Fujieda, Y. (2006). A brief historical sketch of second language writing studies: A retrospective. Kyoai Gakuen Maebashi Kokusai Daigaku Ronsyuu, 6, 59-72. Retrieved from https://gair.media.gunmau.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10