Journals / Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Small State Theory and Dynamics of Kyrgyz Foreign Policy in Ceenbekov Period

Küçük Devlet Kuramı ve Ceenbekov Dönemi Kırgız Dış Politikasının Dinamikleri

Pages
945–951
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In summary, in the light of these considerations, this study aims to make sense of the foreign policy of Jeenbekov period by drawing on the research of (Cooley, 2012), (Sarı, 2012) and (Toktomushev, 2015, 2016).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:By focusing on Kyrgyz’s foreign policy during the Jeenbekov period, this study argues that there has been no structural break from the past in terms of the direction of foreign policy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within this framework, it is propounded that Kyrgyz foreign policy can only be explained in terms of some underlying establishments independent of leadership change.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In summary, in the light of these considerations, this study aims to make sense of the foreign policy of Jeenbekov period by drawing on the research of (Cooley, 2012), (Sarı, 2012) and (Toktomushev, 2015, 2016).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

By focusing on Kyrgyz’s foreign policy during the Jeenbekov period, this study argues that there has been no structural break from the past in terms of the direction of foreign policy. Within this framework, it is propounded that Kyrgyz foreign policy can only be explained in terms of some underlying establishments independent of leadership change. In this research, the Jeenbekov period in Kyrgyz’s foreign policy was examined using a small state perspective. Within this framework, it is asserted that the Russia-centric foreign policy of Kyrgyzstan continued in the Jeenbekov period as a result of the gradual withdrawal of the United States. Moreover, it is claimed that Kyrgyzstan’s relationship with global and regional powers is by no means detached from her domestic politics. In summary, in the light of these considerations, this study aims to make sense of the foreign policy of Jeenbekov period by drawing on the research of (Cooley, 2012), (Sarı, 2012) and (Toktomushev, 2015, 2016).

Özet

Ceenbekov dönemi Kırgız dış politikasının ele alındığı bu çalışmada ilgili dönemde dış politikadabelirgin bir kırılmanın yaşanmadığı iddia edilmektedir. Bu çerçevede Kırgız dış politikasınıngerçekleşen lider değişiminden bağımsız olarak süreklilik arz eden müesses yapıların keşfedilmesivasıtasıyla doğru şekilde anlamlandırılacağı savlanmaktadır. Bu değerlendirmede küçük devletyaklaşımı yardımıyla Ceenbekov dönemi dış politikası analiz edilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Bukapsamda ABD’nin tedrici geri çekilişi sonucunda Ceenbekov döneminde de Rusya merkezlisiyasetin kesintisiz devam ettiği iddia edilmektedir. Ayrıca küçük devlet kavramı etrafında teorizeedilen bu çalışmada Kırgızistan’ın bölgesel ve küresel güçlerle olan ilişkilerinin iç politikadanbağımsız olmadığı iddia edilecektir. Özetle, tüm bu değerlendirmeler ışığında, (Cooley, 2012), (Sarı,2012) ve (Toktomushev, 2015, 2016)’in araştırmalarından faydalanılarak Ceenbekov dönemi dışpolitikası anlamlandırılmaya çalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZŞAHİN, M. C. (2022). Small State Theory and Dynamics of Kyrgyz Foreign Policy in Ceenbekov Period. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 945–951. https://ajindex.com/articles/439849

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aitymbetov, S. (2006). Emigrant remittances: Impact on economic development of Kyrgyzstan. (ICEG, European Centre,Working Paper 31, Budapest) Akmoldoev, K., & Budaichieva, A. (2012). The impact of remittances on Kyrgyzstan economy. Reforma (Реформа), 4, 53-59.
  2. Alkan, H. (2012). Türk Cumhuriyetlerinde Siyasal Kurumsallasma Süreci: Geçen Yirmi Yılın Bir Bilançosu. Bilig, 61, 1 -30. Babayan, N. (2015). The return of the empire? Russia's counteraction to transatlantic democracy promotion in its near abroad. Democratization, 22(3), 438-458.
  3. Bailes, A. J., Thayer, B. A., & Thorhallsson, B. (2016). Alliance theory and alliance ‘Shelter’: the complexities of small state alliance behaviour. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1(1), 9-26. BBC. (2018, 27 Şubat). Kyrgyzstan country profile. Erişim Adresi https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia- 16186907 Bishop, M. L. (2012). The political economy of small states: Enduring vulnerability? Review of International Political Economy, 19(5), 942-960.
  4. Brown, D. R. (2010). Institutional development in small states: Evidence from the Commonwealth Caribbean. Administrative Culture, 11(1), 44-65.
  5. Cha, T. (2016). The Return of Jacksonianism: the International Implications of the Trump Phenomenon. The Washington Quarterly, 39(4), 83- 97. Chong, A. (2010). Small state soft power strategies: virtual enlargement in the cases of the Vatican City State and Singapore. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), 383-405.
  6. Coldoşov, A. (2017). Kırgızistan'ın iç Politikası. İçinde Cengiz Buyar (Ed.). Kırgızistan: Tarih-ToplumEkonomi-Siyaset. (s.245-286), Bişkek: BYR Publishing. Cooley, A. (2012). Great games, local rules: The new power contest in central Asia, New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Cooley, A. (2019). Ordering Eurasia: The rise and decline of liberal internationalism in the post-communist space. Security Studies, 28(3), 588-613.
  8. Cooper, A. F., & Shaw, T. M. (2009). The Diplomacies of small states at the start of the twenty-first century: How vulnerable? How resilient? İçinde Cooper, A. F., & Shaw, T. M (Ed.), The diplomacies of small states (s.1 -18) New York: Palgrave. Cummings, S. (2001 ). Happier bedfellows? Russia and central Asia under Putin. Asian Affairs, 32(2), 142- 152. Çotaev, Z. (2017). Kırgızistan'ın Dış Politikası: Devam Eden ve Değişen Eğilimler. In Cengiz Buyar (Ed.), Kırgızistan: Tarih-Toplum-Ekonomi-Siyaset (s. 319- 376). Bişkek: BYR Publishing. Dzyubenko, O. (2014, 3 Haziran). U.S. vacates base in Central